by Mike Masnick
Mon, Jul 7th 2008 1:48am
Nearly three years ago, we were surprised to hear the NY Times proudly announce that it was going to merge its online and offline newsrooms. What we couldn't believe was that in 2005 a newspaper actually still had thought it made sense to treat the two separately. However, apparently the Times was way ahead of some other newspapers. Buried in the ho-hum news about massive LA Times layoffs is the news that, as part of this reorganization, it's finally going to merge its web and print operations as well. When you're sitting around wondering where newspapers went wrong, the fact that they wanted to keep web and print operations separate is probably a good place to start.
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- Matthew Keys Gets 2 Years In Jail For 40 Minute Web Defacement He Didn't Even Commit
- Feds Ask For 5 Years In Jail For Matthew Keys Giving Up Tribune Account Password; Still Don't Care About Actual Hacker
- The Toronto Star Loves Commentary So Much, It Will No Longer Let You Comment
- WSJ Writer: All The Failings Of Print Journalism Are The Fault Of The Internet
- German Regulator Rejects German Newspapers' Cynical Attempt To Demand Cash From Google