by Mike Masnick
Fri, Mar 21st 2008 7:42pm
Just as e-voting firm Sequoia is resisting having its machines reviewed independently, the Brookings Institute has put a bunch of e-voting machines to the test, and found error rates around 3% on some of the machines. These weren't errors due to software problems, but usability problems, where the design of the system resulted in people voting for a candidate they did not want. 3% is a huge number, and could easily change the results of an election. While the study found that people generally like e-voting technology, that still doesn't mean it's particularly effective. One other interesting part of the finding: when there was a voter-verified paper trail, it didn't cut down on errors. This suggests that many voters were either confused or didn't even bother to verify their vote. This should all be very worrisome. Even ignoring the technology problems that these machines have been shown to have, the fact that the design tends to create so many mistake votes should lead people to seriously question the use of e-voting machines.
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- Somehow Everyone Comes Out Looking Terrible In The Effort For Election Recounts
- Alex Halderman Clarifies: Not Sure If Election Was Hacked, But, Uh, Shouldn't Someone Be Checking To Make Sure?
- After All That, E-Voting Experts Suggest Voting Machines May Have Been Hacked For Trump
- Yet Another E-voting Machine Vulnerability Found
- The Old 'Partisan' Lines Don't Fit Nicely With Modern Civil Liberties And Tech Policy Issues