by Mike Masnick
Fri, Feb 29th 2008 7:53pm
Jeremy Jaynes, considered one of the biggest spammers in the US was sentenced to nine years in prison for violating a Virginia anti-spam law. As part of his appeal, Jaynes claimed that the anti-spam law itself was unconstitutional, as it violated his right to free speech. It would appear that argument hasn't worked out, as a somewhat divided Virginia Supreme Court has ruled against him, upholding the conviction. It does raise some interesting first amendment questions -- but most spamming activity involves so many other things that could be considered illegal (such as computer trespass, identity fraud, false advertising, etc., etc., etc.) that you would think spammers could be convicted on charges that have little to do with free speech issues.
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- Attorney General Threatens To Prosecute Reporters For Doing Their Job
- Indian Supreme Court Strikes Down Censorship Law -- But Leaves Web Blocking
- How The Copyright Industry Wants To Undermine Anonymity & Free Speech: 'True Origin' Bills
- Texas Lawmaker Wants To Make It Illegal To Film Cops From Less Than 25 Feet Away
- French Government Starts Blocking Websites With Views The Gov't Doesn't Like