by Mike Masnick
Fri, Feb 29th 2008 7:53pm
Jeremy Jaynes, considered one of the biggest spammers in the US was sentenced to nine years in prison for violating a Virginia anti-spam law. As part of his appeal, Jaynes claimed that the anti-spam law itself was unconstitutional, as it violated his right to free speech. It would appear that argument hasn't worked out, as a somewhat divided Virginia Supreme Court has ruled against him, upholding the conviction. It does raise some interesting first amendment questions -- but most spamming activity involves so many other things that could be considered illegal (such as computer trespass, identity fraud, false advertising, etc., etc., etc.) that you would think spammers could be convicted on charges that have little to do with free speech issues.
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- U.S. Court Of Appeals Upholds Ruling That New Hampshire's Silly Ballot Selfie Ban Violated The First Amendment
- How I Taught A Jury About Trolls, Memes And 4Chan -- And Helped Get A Troll Out Of Jail
- Nigerian Government Officials Abusing Cybercrime Law To Silence Critical Journalists
- Man Arrested For Parodying Police Department's Facebook Page Sues City, PD Over Rights Violations
- New California Law Attempts To Fight Hollywood Ageism By Censoring Third-Party Websites