by Mike Masnick
Fri, Feb 29th 2008 7:53pm
Jeremy Jaynes, considered one of the biggest spammers in the US was sentenced to nine years in prison for violating a Virginia anti-spam law. As part of his appeal, Jaynes claimed that the anti-spam law itself was unconstitutional, as it violated his right to free speech. It would appear that argument hasn't worked out, as a somewhat divided Virginia Supreme Court has ruled against him, upholding the conviction. It does raise some interesting first amendment questions -- but most spamming activity involves so many other things that could be considered illegal (such as computer trespass, identity fraud, false advertising, etc., etc., etc.) that you would think spammers could be convicted on charges that have little to do with free speech issues.
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- Appeals Court Tells City It Can't Use Its Terribly-Written Zoning Laws To Censor Speech
- Moral Panics: Twitter Feels Compelled To Tell You It's Deleted Over 125,000 Terrorist Twitter Accounts
- 20 Years Ago Today: The Most Important Law On The Internet Was Signed, Almost By Accident
- Enigma Software Decides The Best Way To Deal With A Negative Review Is To Sue The Reviewer
- Russia Blocks Another Archive Site Because It Might Contain Old Pages About Drugs