Microsoft Buys Another Desperate Company: Danger Goes To Redmond

from the danger,-danger,-bill-gates dept

It would appear that Microsoft's M&A team isn't solely focused on Yahoo these days. Back in December, we noted that Danger, makers of the Sidekick mobile phone device, was planning to IPO, despite not having a track record worth an IPO. As we noted at the time, it seemed like the company was going to IPO because that was its only option. The truth is probably that the company was desperately looking for a buyout, and now Microsoft has come through. It will be worth watching to see what Microsoft does with Danger, as Danger does not use Microsoft's operating system, and its model is not based on licensing software, but in taking a toll from service fees. It would take quite a bit of effort to pull out Danger's OS, which was very carefully designed for the device itself, and replace it with Windows Mobile (and it also might lead Sidekick fans to flee to other devices). All in all, it's an odd sort of acquisition for Microsoft. One would hope that the company actually has more specific plans on what to do with Danger, because the obvious fit isn't apparent. From Danger's perspective, though, an acquisition by anyone at this point has to be viewed as a better option than trying to IPO, which almost definitely would have been a disaster.


Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  1.  
    identicon
    4-80-sicks, Feb 11th, 2008 @ 10:52am

    Whee! It's like the 90s all over again! Except then, Microsoft was the "desperate" party, trying to buy anything that looked like potential competition. Danger doesn't look like it fits that model? Well, just like with the xBox (XBox? Xbox? XBOX? I forget) and Zune, there is now room for computer-like devices everywhere. Room for Microsoft everywhere, yay! And if somebody else is in my living room, in my pocket, MS sees that as a lost opportunity I guess?

    I don't know what's confusing about this, they say right in the article this is a "perfect complement to [their] existing software and services"... Clear as day! haha

    To be serious for a minute: Probably what it is is they want Danger's contracts, and they don't want another company's platform to get too popular. MS SOP. Who needs a plan, if you own the competition (however tenuous that connection may be), they cease to be a problem.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  2.  
    icon
    GeneralEmergency (profile), Feb 11th, 2008 @ 10:56am

    Does Microsoft not have a VP of Obvious Joke Contr

    I mean really.

    Microsoft + Danger = Exploding Cellphone in your pants.

    Helllooooo, Is this thing on? Tap Tap Tap.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  3.  
    identicon
    kamikyo, Feb 11th, 2008 @ 11:27am

    Microsoft needs a successful mobile gaming platfor

    I see this as a possible foray by MS into the casual mobile gaming market. The Sidekick seems more similar to the PSP and DS than to the latest Next Big Thing in the mobile phone world, the iPhone. MS is sorely lacking a mobile 'xbox' gaming platform, and the Sidekick interface/patents & general internet-readiness have the added benefit of leveraging what has been the once clear success of the xbox platform - xbox live.

    The question is: Is Danger cable of being the catalyst for this drive?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  4.  
    icon
    Onikitsune (profile), Feb 11th, 2008 @ 11:35am

    This really does make sense.

    This seems like a good choice for Microsoft. As noted earlier in the month, MS is trying to build up a hardware market, and this will help to solve that problem. Second, as noted in the article above, Danger has a service based revenue stream. It's clear that MS want to expand into that market as well. acquiring Danger will give Microsoft a focused insight on how that can work, then apply that to their advantage. Over all a good move on their part.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  5.  
    identicon
    Aaron Friel, Feb 11th, 2008 @ 11:48am

    Re: 4-80-sicks

    Conspiracy theories without understanding the industries involved are humorous, at best.

    They don't want Danger to be too popular? Hah! There are plenty of competitors in the mobile space that are vastly more popular than Danger. This is like McDonalds buying up a 3-store franchise in order to prevent Burger King from taking over the fast food world.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  6.  
    identicon
    Joel Coehoorn, Feb 11th, 2008 @ 12:01pm

    Keeping up with Google

    It's simple: Microsoft has to keep up with Google and Apple. They made moves into the cell phone area with iPhone and Android. Now Microsoft needs to make it's phone play. The investment required to get windows mobile running on the sidekick will be significant, but it's a fraction of what it cost to purchase the company so perhaps MS feels it's justified.

    What is surprising is that a lot of the value in this purchase is the Sidekick brand, but MS already has a mobile brand in the Zune if all it wants to do is match Apple. Don't be surprised to see a new phone released as the Zune Sidekick, or some mashup like that.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  7.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Feb 11th, 2008 @ 12:22pm

    Re: Keeping up with Google

    Android/gPhone looks awesome. It's a phone that you can play quake on... What have we become?

    Looks like Google is going to give away $10M bounty for the best applications also. Guess it's time to dust off the ABAP programming book...

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_avwGFsv60U

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  8.  
    identicon
    4-80-sicks, Feb 11th, 2008 @ 12:30pm

    Re: Re: 4-80-sicks

    Conspiracy theories without understanding the industries involved are humorous, at best.

    I think you did not understand what I meant. It's about taking over the entire market at this point (maybe never again), it's about just having a hand in. Dominance is the preferred position, of course, but even giants have to start with baby steps when entering new spaces. No conspiracy theory here.

    Why they chose Danger in particular, well OK, I can't say for sure, because--surprise, surprise--I don't work for Microsoft. Maybe you can come up with a better idea as to the reason? Or do you just like to shit-talk? I would only develop what I already wrote: the Sidekick is a very high-profile, popular model phone, which happens to not run Windows Mobile. How many other smart phones make that claim, besides the iPhone? Not very many, right? You see Microsoft appreciating that being out there? I don't. That's not a conspiracy, that's history repeating itself, not to mention the way business often works.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  9.  
    identicon
    4-80-sicks, Feb 11th, 2008 @ 12:37pm

    Re: Re: 4-80-sicks

    "...it's *not* about taking over the entire market at this point." Oops.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  10.  
    identicon
    Wesha, Feb 11th, 2008 @ 12:39pm

    > It would take quite a bit of effort to pull out Danger's OS, and replace it with Windows Mobile
    > (and it also might lead Sidekick fans to flee to other devices).

    No way! Gods, please please please pull out that piece of crap and give me some kind of REAL OS that will at least let me install MY apps!!!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  11.  
    identicon
    BillGod, Feb 11th, 2008 @ 12:49pm

    HMMMM gives me an idea

    Microsoft if your reading this.

    I am planning on IPO'ing myself. You can buy me for 44 billion dollars at any time.

    Thanks
    BillGod

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  12.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Feb 11th, 2008 @ 1:32pm

    Re: Does Microsoft not have a VP of Obvious Joke C

    GeneralEmergency + No sunlight for 80 hours = pathetic

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  13.  
    icon
    GeneralEmergency (profile), Feb 11th, 2008 @ 1:35pm

    Re: Re: Does Microsoft not have a VP of Obvious Jo

    "No sunlight for 80 hours"

    Well...duuhhh. This IS Seattle. They don't turn the sun back on until May!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  14.  
    identicon
    joe smith, Feb 11th, 2008 @ 2:39pm

    big suprise, ms still trying to take over the world

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  15.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Cretin, Feb 11th, 2008 @ 2:43pm

    Shoulda bought Palm instead ,er, first.

    Palm products already run WinCE, or whatever it's called now. And Palm just might be desperate enough to fall for a buyout. Unless, of course, the Foleo really takes off. Yeah. Right.

    Instead, MS will try to cram WinCE into the Hiptop and re-brand it as a Zunephone. Current Hiptop owners will switch to iPhone because they won't want to be mistaken for un-hip Zunephone-using rednecks.

    Zunephone sales will hover near zero because consumers will not want to figure out how to use WinCE and styli and all that. Zunephone will join its DOA sibling, the Zune, and MS will need to buy another sickly techno-weakling company to make it seem like they're doing something, ANYTHING, in addition to milking Windows and Office (money makers) and shilling Xbox (money loser.) Hmmm. How about Yahoo?

    Hey Ballmer: why has Microsoft stock dropped more than 40% since you took over from Bill? Better get Big Ass Table (aka Surface) out the door soon. Real cash cow for sure.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  16.  
    identicon
    cyunt, Mar 3rd, 2008 @ 11:35am

    Re: Microsoft needs a successful mobile gaming pla

    agreed.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  17.  
    identicon
    alex barnes, Oct 30th, 2008 @ 7:37pm

    go for it

    Really, I think MS just just go for it. They have so much fu*ken money anywayz and the hiptop sidekicks are awesome. If only they had flash so people can watch youtube and everything. That's the only main problem with the sidekicks but if they had a MS OS on the hiptop I probley just get an iphone

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Follow Techdirt
A word from our sponsors...
Essential Reading
Techdirt Reading List
Techdirt Insider Chat
A word from our sponsors...
Recent Stories
A word from our sponsors...

Close

Email This