Legal Issues

by Mike Masnick


Filed Under:
patents, shopping list, wish list

Companies:
microsoft



Microsoft Patents Making A List For Santa

from the but-not-checking-it-twice dept

theodp writes "Yes Virginia, there is a Santa Claus. But making a list for him may now constitute patent infringement. USPTO officials were busy over the holidays wrapping up the paperwork to grant Microsoft its wish for a patent on the Wish List, which was issued to the software giant on New Year's Day." Admittedly, the actual patent goes into a bit more detail than theodp's summary. It involves making a wishlist that goes beyond just a single store, which can include categories rather than just products and which also pulls in additional shopping info. Even with that additional info, it's difficult to see why this is deserving of a patent, as it really just seems to be combining a bunch of things that were easily done before online -- and we had thought that the Patent Office had issued new guidelines, as per the Supreme Court's ruling, to avoid such combinations.

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • identicon
    Jason Still, 3 Jan 2008 @ 10:44am

    well, that sucks...

    I have, quite literally, had something like this on the drawing board (on the wall across from my desk) as a feature of a larger web-based product for months. I haven't had the time to work on that project due to other priorities, and I'm guessing now I might was well give up on it. It never occurred to me that something so obvious could/would/should be patented.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Santa, 3 Jan 2008 @ 10:45am

    WTF

    WTF. I'm suing.
    I've been using this for the last 2000 years.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Fred Grainger, 3 Jan 2008 @ 10:47am

    Micro$oft is out of control

    I hope with the flop of Vista, the underhanded blocking of old document formats in Office 2003, and the other crapware that Microsoft is putting out, that the company self destructs. I'm so sick of their greed I am about to become a Apple customer.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 3 Jan 2008 @ 10:59am

      Re: Micro$oft is out of control

      haha.

      u think Apple isn't greedy?

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Bobby Cannon, 3 Jan 2008 @ 12:02pm

      Re: Micro$oft is out of control

      What makes you think Vista is a flop?

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        Anonymous Coward, 3 Jan 2008 @ 12:07pm

        Re: Re: Micro$oft is out of control

        Nobody wanting to use it in an enterprise setting...

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        Joe Smith, 3 Jan 2008 @ 12:22pm

        Re: Re: Micro$oft is out of control

        What makes you think Vista is a flop?

        The security measures taken to patch the defective security model in the earlier versions of Windows are an exercise in frustration for the user. That and the minimum two gigs of ram you need to run it.

        But if you want something that will really reduce users to screaming frustration you need to try the new versions of Microsoft Office where key functions are hidden behind what appears simply to be a logo.

        That said, after the EOLAS farce, I do not blame Microsoft for patenting every possible little detail. Even if the patent is rejected, the application creates a formal record of prior art at the time of filing.

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Patent Trolls, 3 Jan 2008 @ 11:03am

    Self-protection

    I think many of these patents filed by the likes of Apple, IBM, M$ is in response to patent trolls suing for infringement on even the most obvious incremental changes. I feel they file these mainly to protect themselves from predatory lawsuits.

    That being said, this patent seems to do the same things as any content aggregation site. Sites like pricegrabber allow you to shop by product or category from multiple sources; and it includes product info., manufacturer data, user reviews, store information, etc. Seems like prior art to me.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Derrick Hinkle, 3 Jan 2008 @ 11:03am

    Apple may be greedy, but at least they give their customers what they want, and give them some respect.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 3 Jan 2008 @ 11:25am

    I wonder what this means for sites like mylistwatcher.com

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Joe, 3 Jan 2008 @ 11:40am

    Protection

    I agree that it is only a measure that microsoft is taking to prevent another lawsuit. If they don't patent it some other no name company will and then will sue them for using it.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Josh Jacob, 3 Jan 2008 @ 2:51pm

    there's also, wishbin.com

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Tom, 3 Jan 2008 @ 7:07pm

    And don't forget

    Wow, Wishlist.com has been around for a while, doesn't that count as prior art. Maybe they should have copyrighted the name.

    Tom

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Rekrul, 3 Jan 2008 @ 8:16pm

    I want to patent the idea of breathing, then everyone will have to pay me if they want to continue living.

    What? It's no more stupid than any other of the roughly 2 million idiotic patents companies have filed for recently.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Ban Software Patents, 31 Jan 2008 @ 4:30pm

    This is terrible

    So now all we have to do to be technology tycoons is go to law school and file as many software patents as we can? We don't need to write good software anymore? Hurray for software patents. Let's keep ripping off people that actually have to WORK for a living. That's who gets hurt in the end. That's why I'm $2450 poorer and own a bunch of JUNK that doesn't work right or at all.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    marrya, 6 Mar 2008 @ 10:08am

    lip stisc

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Jeff, 30 Jun 2008 @ 11:51am

    How is WishList.com not prior art?

    How is WishList.com not prior art?

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 4 Nov 2010 @ 7:11am

    This is a test.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 4 Nov 2010 @ 7:13am

    This is another test.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Use markdown for basic formatting. HTML is no longer supported.
  Save me a cookie
Follow Techdirt
Techdirt Gear
Shop Now: Techdirt Logo Gear
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Chat
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Recent Stories
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads

Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.