by Mike Masnick
Fri, Aug 3rd 2007 3:40am
For years, every time yet another report would come out about e-voting vulnerabilities, we'd quickly see responses from elections officials defending the e-voting systems. It wasn't a surprise to hear the e-voting manufacturers defend their machines, but why would elections officials almost always take the side of the e-voting manufacturers over various computer security experts and the very voters whose votes they're supposed to be protecting? There are some obvious possibilities, such as embarrassment over buying faulty machines or (more likely) fear at the cost of replacing those machines. However, Tim Lee points to a potentially more troublesome reason: many elections officials move in and out of jobs for the e-voting companies before and after their state jobs. Conflict of interest? Apparently it's just politics as usual.
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- Texas Judge Indicted For Making Secret 10-Year Deal With Red Light Camera Company
- Senate Just Barely Rejects Plan To Expand FBI Surveillance Powers
- Australian Electoral Commission Refuses To Allow Researchers To Check E-Voting Software
- Both Trump And Clinton Suggest Expanding Mass Surveillance, Bogus Watch Lists After Attack In Orlando
- City Of Mesa Abusing Trademark Law To Punish City Council Candidate They Don't Like