by Mike Masnick
Fri, Aug 3rd 2007 3:40am
For years, every time yet another report would come out about e-voting vulnerabilities, we'd quickly see responses from elections officials defending the e-voting systems. It wasn't a surprise to hear the e-voting manufacturers defend their machines, but why would elections officials almost always take the side of the e-voting manufacturers over various computer security experts and the very voters whose votes they're supposed to be protecting? There are some obvious possibilities, such as embarrassment over buying faulty machines or (more likely) fear at the cost of replacing those machines. However, Tim Lee points to a potentially more troublesome reason: many elections officials move in and out of jobs for the e-voting companies before and after their state jobs. Conflict of interest? Apparently it's just politics as usual.
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- An Ongoing Lack Of Technical Prowess Is Resulting In Bad Laws, Bad Prosecutions, And Bad Judicial Decisions
- Trump Offers More Insight On His Cybersecurity Plans: 10-Year-Old Relatives Vs. 400-lb Bedroom Dwellers
- Nashville Council Member Admits AT&T & Comcast Wrote The Anti-Google Fiber Bill She Submitted
- Pressure Mounts to Punish Russia For Hacking Without Evidence And Before Investigations Are Concluded
- FBI Director: Our Electronic Voting System Is Such A Complete Mess, It Would Be Difficult To Hack