ABC Finally Sees The (Ad-Supported) Light

from the get-on-the-bus dept

We’ve watched TV networks stumble around a bit online, trying to find their way — selling shows on iTunes or through Google, or using obtuse streaming methods. We’ve wondered for some time why they didn’t simply make the shows freely available online, but keep advertisements in — the same model that’s worked pretty well for broadcast TV, and one that people are clearly in favor of. Finally, one network is going to try it, as ABC says it will soon offer ad-supported shows for download from its site. Free downloading of shows is already going on, with or without the networks. But if they can offer users easy, legitimate downloads — without all sorts of stupid restrictions — there’s a good chance people will accept the ads. The broadcast channel is an outdated concept, and it looks like networks are very slowly starting to realize this. What took them so long?


Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “ABC Finally Sees The (Ad-Supported) Light”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
11 Comments
The Other Mike says:

Encourage it...

While I agree with the sentiment, maybe try more praise and less criticism when a company finally starts to see the light? Don’t mean to be difficult but I know it would peeve me if I were in their shoes. Even if it were a long road to seeing the light, they did arrive at the same place in the end while the others are still picking their noses.

The Other Mike says:

Re: Re: Encourage it...

Was simply a suggestion for improvement. Not that I dislike the site or anything. I rather like it but after having been a reader for some time now it seems to me that sometimes a little kudos could be in order for companies/industries that finally get the idea on big picture things.

After I read the article I just put myself in the shoes of the exec’s and was asking what would I think of the response to the decision to do this? It seems that keeping them in the doghouse after getting it together isn’t serving as much of a motivator for change. But maybe it’s just me since I know what it’s like to be – professionally – in an endless cycle of trying to placate people who have no desire to be so.

Just an observation really. It’s not important enough to me to have to justify, beyond explaining what I meant, so forget I said anything. 🙂

Dan Mayer (user link) says:

Re: yippie

seriously i would have done this years ago if i was one of the big media companies. I thought about trying to buy up old rights to old TV shows and trying this anyways. Think nick at night but watch whenever online just download with commecials. BRILLIANT. i bet they get a patent on the “original” idea of just making TV you can watch anytime with no commercials. If a company does this really well with a good interface and tech they will have a larger audience than ever before.

on an unrelated note, I like waffles.

Tin Ear (user link) says:

Streaming ad content gets sticky...

A while ago, I was a DJ at a small local radio station. The problem we were having with streaming our signal online (through our own site) was that there was no way to quantify our listener base. On the air, we had a listener base that they could count, based on how far our signal extended, and the population demographic of the area. Online, there was no way to count how many people were listing to our signal, or even where they were listening from.

The network to whom we subscribed figured that if we could not track how many people were listening online, they would charge us an exorbitant ‘blanket’ fee for their service. They figured that we (a small family owned radio station in the middle of Montana..) would have a world-wide listener base and wanted to charge us accordingly! This was way above any possibility for the station to afford, so streaming was pretty much out of the question. We could still stream our local coverage of the local school sporting events, but the network music and advertising would be out of the question.
It all comes down to the dollar, in the end.

Sarojin says:

Re: Streaming ad content gets sticky...

I’ve worked in streaming media, including software dev. The info you post about streaming is completely wrong. You can track and gather all sorts of usage data from stream connections. And it is no more expensive than just a normal stream.

From what you post I question the integrity of the folks you discussed this with. Sounds like they wanted to exploit your lack of technical knowledge.

Every single network provider monitors bandwidth usage, and can do so at a very granular level.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Ctrl-Alt-Speech

A weekly news podcast from
Mike Masnick & Ben Whitelaw

Subscribe now to Ctrl-Alt-Speech »
Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Loading...