FCC Says OK To Telco Mergers, With A Few Conditions

from the this-is-consensus? dept

As expected, the FCC has given the official okay on the two big telco mergers: SBC buying AT&T and Verizon buying MCI. It had been rumored that the delay from last week was due to a feverish attempt this weekend to work out concessions that would bring the two Democratic commissioners to vote for approval as well -- and that's exactly what happened. The full details aren't clear from some of the articles being published, but it sounds like SBC and Verizon will be required to offer naked DSL while also freezing prices on their wholesale access to other providers. Other terms include some vague language about network neutrality and promises that MCI wouldn't break any peering arrangements. The real trick was getting the mergers approved (though, that was hardly in doubt). What will be worth watching -- given both SBC and Verizon's history -- is whether or not they really stick to the rest of the agreements or start doubletalking their way around the provisions while simultaneously lobbying to have these issues dropped because they "prevent fair competition" or something along those lines. It's how they've acted in the past, so it's hard to expect anything different this time around.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • identicon
    Joe Example, 31 Oct 2005 @ 7:33pm

    Great article that spells out a lot of detail on t

    http://www.convergedigest.com/Bandwidth/newnetworksarticle.asp?ID=16437

    FCC Sets Conditions for SBC/AT&T and Verizon/MCI Mergers
    The FCC voted to approve the acquisition of AT&T by SBC Communications and of MCI by Verizon Communications, concluding that consumers will benefit and that these mergers will create stable, reliable U.S.-owned companies that will provide improved service to government customers and benefit national defense and homeland security. Significantly, the FCC imposed a set of conditions aimed at alleviating anticompetitive concerns. These include the following:

    * The applicants committed not to seek an increase in state-approved rates for unbundled network elements (UNEs) for two years (except for rates that are subject to current appeals in specific states).
    * The applicants committed to a one-time recalculation to exclude fiber-based collocation arrangements established by AT&T in SBC’s region and MCI in Verizon’s region in identifying wire centers in which SBC or Verizon claims there is no impairment pursuant to the UNE triggers in the Triennial Review Remand Order so that dedicated transport and/or high-capacity loops need not be unbundled.
    * The applicants committed to implement a “Service Quality Measurement Plan,” which will provide the Commission with quarterly performance results for interstate special access services. This commitment will terminate the earlier of 30 months and 45 days after the beginning of the first full quarter following the closing of the mergers, or the effective date of a Commission order adopting general special access performance measurement requirements.
    * The applicants committed, for 30 months, not to increase the rates paid by existing in-region customers of AT&T in SBC’s region or MCI in Verizon’s region for wholesale DS1 and DS3 local private line services. SBC/AT&T and Verizon/MCI committed, for a period of 30 months, not to provide special access services to themselves, their interexchange affiliates, or each other or their affiliates, that are not generally available to other similarly situated customers.
    * The applicants committed that for a period of 30 months, before they provide new or modified contract tariffed service to their own section 272(a) affiliate(s), they will certify to the Commission that they provide service pursuant to those contract tariffs to unaffiliated customers other than each other or their wireline affiliates.
    * The applicants committed for a period of 30 months not to increase rates set forth in SBC’s and Verizon’s interstate tariffs for special access services, including contract tariffs, that they provide in their in-region territory that are on file with the Commission on the Merger Closing Dates.
    * The applicants committed, for a period of three years, to maintain settlement-free peering arrangements with at least as many providers of Internet backbone services as they did in combination on the Merger Closing Dates.
    * The applicants committed for a period of two years to post their peering policies on publicly accessible websites. During this two-year period, the applicants will post any revisions to their peering policies on a timely basis as they occur.
    * SBC/AT&T acknowledged: (1) that the merger does not change carrier of last resort obligations imposed by the State of Alaska on interexchange services provided by Alascom; (2) that the merger will not alter statutory and regulatory geographic rate averaging and rate integration rules that apply on the merger closing date to Alascom; and (3) after the merger closing date, they will operate Alascom as a distinct, though not structurally separate, corporate entity.
    * The applicants committed to provide, within 12 months of the Merger Closing Dates, DSL service to in-region customers without requiring them to also purchase circuit-switched voice telephone service. The companies will make the offering for two years from the time it is made available in a particular state.
    * The applicants committed for a period of two years to conduct business in a way that comports with the Commission’s Internet policy statement issued in September.

    Some industry commentary: FCC Chairman Kevin Martin: "It is my expectation that these mergers will only increase the incentive and ability of the merged entities to invest in broadband infrastructure and spread the deployment of advanced services to all Americans."

    FCC Commissioner Michael Copps: "These mergers can also be seen as an epitaph for the competition that many of us thought we would enjoy as a result of the Telecommunications Act of 1996. That legislation, I am convinced, envisioned a vastly different communications landscape than the one we find ourselves living in today.

    SBC chairman and CEO Edward E. Whitacre Jr. "The commission vote demonstrates a recognition that the merger of SBC and AT&T will enhance competition, help bring new technologies to market faster, and provide real benefits to consumers and businesses."

    AT&T chairman and CEO David W. Dorman: "Today's decision brings us one step closer to a new era in communications, information services and entertainment. Combined, SBC and AT&T will deliver superior network services and a portfolio of solutions that will help both businesses and consumers."

    Verizon VP of Public Affairs Tom Tauke: "After two federal reviews and strong approvals by shareholders and the international community, it is clear that this combination is undeniably in the public interest."

    Qwest: "Today, the FCC stood with millions of telecommunications users against two mega-firms trying to turn back the clock. By imposing meaningful conditions on the plans of SBC and Verizon to acquire their largest competitors, the FCC has reaffirmed its commitment to open and competitive telecommunications markets.

    XO Senior Vice President, Government Relations, Heather Gold: "By helping safeguard competition in the wholesale market, today's decision by the FCC is an important victory for the competitive local telecom industry - and for millions of business customers... We thank the Commissioners and staff for their efforts to forge meaningful conditions designed to ensure ongoing customer choice and price competition for millions of small to medium business customers, and we hope that the FCC will vigorously enforce its actions so that these conditions are not hollow promises."

    EarthLink's Chris Putala, executive vice president for public policy: "We applaud today's Federal Communications Commission decision that requires SBC and Verizon to offer Stand-Alone DSL as a condition for their separate merger approvals. As a result of this decision, more than 80 million consumers will now be able to take advantage of emerging Internet voice and data applications without also having to buy legacy wire-line local telephone service from their phone company. Today's FCC decision in favor of mandatory 'net neutrality' provisions helps guarantee the rights of all consumers to access the Internet content and applications they choose."

    Global Crossing CEO John Legere: "The FCC's decisions reflect the concerns expressed by many telecommunication companies, including Global Crossing, that these mergers might alter the competitive balance in the special access and Internet backbone market. The fact that the FCC was willing to freeze special access prices for 30 months and require continued Internet peering for three years (among other important safeguards) gives Global Crossing confidence in our ability to compete on a level playing field in years ahead."
    http://www.fcc.gov
    31-Oct-05

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here



Subscribe to the Techdirt Daily newsletter




Comment Options:

  • Use markdown. Use plain text.
  • Remember name/email/url (set a cookie)

Close

Add A Reply

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here



Subscribe to the Techdirt Daily newsletter




Comment Options:

  • Use markdown. Use plain text.
  • Remember name/email/url (set a cookie)

Follow Techdirt
Insider Shop - Show Your Support!

Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Chat
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Recent Stories
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.