RSS
Sun Welcomes You To 1999 With Its Google Non-Announcement
from the i'm-forever-blowing-bubbles dept
The rumor mill's been working overtime the last few days as hype built up surrounding an announcement from Google and Sun. Much of the speculation was that they'd announce some type of collaboration on Sun's OpenOffice productivity suite -- speculation strong enough to be cited as causing Microsoft's share price to drop. The announcement came out this morning, and it conjures up memories of the dot-com days in its pointlessness: Sun will give users the opportunity to download the Google toolbar when they download the Sun Java virtual machine. That's it, apart from more bubble-days rhetoric saying "the companies have agreed to explore opportunities to promote and enhance Sun technologies" like OpenOffice. Some people are scrambling to find the meat of the deal, but there really isn't any there -- Google doesn't even think it's big enough to warrant putting out their own press release. This seems like a ploy by Sun to try and gain some attention and good press by latching on to Google, when there's not a lot of underlying substance -- much like the recent Apple/Motorola collaboration. Like Apple, Google seems content to let Sun make a little noise for the time being, until it unleashes its nano to steal all the thunder. Like Steve Jobs saying Apple worked with Motorola as a "learning experience", Google's got something up its sleeve. But when that announcement comes, don't expect Sun to get much mention.
Reader Comments (rss)
(Flattened / Threaded)
It's still an interesting alliance
Sun has been talking about "the network is the computer" and "thin clients" for a very, very long time. Java is a decade-old established technology towards that goal, but still doesn't have the ubiquity of Macromedia Flash. A paternership with Google could change that.
I have to think that Google is feeling a bit vulnerable at times being built on DHTML and AJAX, given that Microsoft always has the power to do what they've done time and time again with their APIs, and "break" things in IE once and awhile to disadvantage Google.
Java, on the other hand, has cross-platform support second to none, runs in any browser, is fairly safe from Microsoft fiddling with IE (as it just sits in a chunk of screen real estate and draws itself, like Flash.)
Similarly, Sun has an investment in its own Linux distribution and OpenOffice. Both of those stand to benefit Google, especially if they were to become Google branded and web delivered. Google Office? Google desktop? Disk storage and CPU delivered similar to Citrix or remote X sessions, running over the Internet... it's quite a powerful possibility, and an excellent source of ad revenue (for Google) and hardware sales (to Google) from Sun.
I mean, look at Gmail's success and consider what a GDrive would mean?
People just want their computer to work and work safely. Google and Sun can make that happen. And Microsoft has every right to be concerned, because they have an Office and OS release they are still trying to get out the door -- lots can be delivered for free by Sun and Google in the interim.
Ballmer is surely bouncing around in an ape-rage, breaking furniture and such.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Correction
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
agree for the most part...
Ajax and DHTML have their limitations. To take more control of the desktop, Google needs something more powerful. Java might be the answer
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Not!
1) They have a huge "number" to make
2) The only way to make that number is to have the massive corporate install base of Office users move from 2000 to current (or similar upgrade scenario)
3) None of their customers want to do this so MSFT is looking for applications that "force" an upgrade
4) Corporate users don't see the value in upgrading as they use a fraction of the software in Office (think about it...you don't either)
5) Corporations are SICK and TIRED of the maintenance burden of PCs and MSFT software
5) Broadband is everywhere. As Dilbert says "You can't stop the Internet Idiot!"
6) Hosted office is the only outcome that will materialize in the future (economic and ease of use view) and MSFT is not making any material contribution in this area (or any other unless the XBOX360 is the focus)
7) The latest MSFT reorg did not help any of this
It may be time for 1999! You can quote me on that.
Cheers,
MSFT Realist
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
No Subject Given
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Not!
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Not!
Open office is nice, but it needs a lot of work before it can touch MS Office. If google were to come along and provide such software via the net or whatever... well... that's the while point of this.
The problem is -not- older versions of office (who knows if MSFT knows this). The problem -is- people coming along and breaking the monopoly. I think we are getting close.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Google PR
Interesting URL though. 8-)
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
lol
I say Google got some cash, now thinks its a jack of all trades and a master of none.
Meanwhile MS has a client base that cant be touched. People like firefox just cant seem to get it right. I mean anyone played with beta 1? Hope they fix it. I personally like firefox. However if i had to pick one itd be IE. Not because its microsoft but because its funded. Meaning they have people working on it. How many problems has firefox had?
I Havnt bought into the whole open source thing yet. Sure its so great and wonderful. People making software for free. Sounds a little socialist idea to me. Sorry bud but i'm not gonna work for free. I get paid for my services. Sure i'll donate some code here and there. As a hobby, don't come crying to me when something breaks... Pay me and i'll make a fix.
Final point of /rant
Funded vs Opensource (mainly freeware)
I don't believe there will ever be a true "open source freeware" project that will "overtake" a funded project. IE Firefox will never overcome IE. Just can't happen. Sure us techno freaks will use it, but it's the mainstream that matters. People like my dad, mom grandma who paid for it. Yea try telling my mom about firefox. She don't care. Her IE works. It's been marketed and sold. Firefox depends on some kiddos "spreading the word".
So to all of you who dream of open souce/freeware ruling the world "like" microsoft... Forget it. It's a daydream that will never come true.
Google knows this. There actions speak loud. They worry about it's own over priced stock falling like a brick anytime now.
Here's the thing, as soon as the mainstream investors in goog figure out that this whole thing is "a dot.com boom era leftover noise" that stock will be sitting at $5.00 bux. At which time i'll join in on the shorting fun.
In the end, google will be back to making spyware for desktops. Can't wait for v3. But this time it'll be the "google" desktop. "How much stock did you buy today?" will be the slogan.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: lol
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: lol
OMG, I'll never use it again. I'm so glad you brought this to my attention. Firefox sucks! Microsoft rules! Go Microsoft!
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Googles Press Release
http://www.google.com/press/pressrel/sun_toolbar.html
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: agree for the most part...
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Add Your Comment