Which Is Less Moral: File Sharing Or Politics As Usual?

from the questions-questions-questions dept

Last week we covered how Senators from both sides of the aisle were suddenly up in arms over the fact that there was porn on file sharing networks (despite the fact that even the Government Accounting Office had come out with a report saying that porn on file sharing networks wasn't much of a problem, especially compared to porn elsewhere on the internet). Broadband Reports has picked up on that story and pointed to a quote where Senator Boxer is quoted saying that file sharing networks affect "children's morality," which is quite a statement. Do photocopying machines affect a child's morality? How about the iPod? Or just a basic internet connection? As Broadband Reports also points out, Boxer received nearly three-quarters of a million dollars from the entertainment industry (and only $200,000 from tech firms). So, which is more likely to affect a child's morality? A product that has perfectly legitimate uses, or finding out that politicians will push legislation to support the highest bidder while claiming it's "to protect the children"?
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • identicon
    bshock, 5 Aug 2005 @ 11:09am

    Let's talk about morality...

    I had a certain respect for Ms. Boxer when she called bullshit during Condi Rice's confirmation hearing. However, this pathetic "moral" grandstanding in regard to pornography makes me ill. Why should we give a fuck about naked pictures online when Dubya and his Junta are murdering thousands in Asia, destroying the environment, and enriching the wealthy at the expense of the poor? Those are major moral issues.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Kent Yoder, 5 Aug 2005 @ 11:28am

    Kudos...

    On the great headline. :-)

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    eskayp, 5 Aug 2005 @ 7:12pm

    Congressional P2P hearings

    I caught the last few minutes on CSPAN today.
    I too had applauded Barbara Boxer's stance on a variety of social and budget issues.
    However, today it was dismaying to see her firmly aligned with a very autocratic and conservative Ted Stevens.
    Additionally it was obvious that both Boxer and Stevens had no idea what P2P was, or was not.
    They were only relying on the fear-based spin that RIAA and MPAA was spoonfeeding them.
    A final confirmation that bad legislation is in the offing were the coyote grins shared among the music and movie reps as they closed their briefcases.
    Just a thought:
    If we are concerned or angered enough to write TechDirt, why aren't we also writing the Committee members and our own congresspeople?
    A few hundred individually written letters from constituents can affect a representative's perspective on an issue.
    If you have the cojones or resolve to contact them, keep your comments civil, emphasize the positive aspects of P2P, and the negatives of overregulation.
    For my own part I will ask why Telephone, Email, regular mail, and printed material should not be forced to have similar 'filtering' requirements.
    It may be an uphill battle at this early stage, but our individual freedom is worth fighting for.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here



Subscribe to the Techdirt Daily newsletter




Comment Options:

  • Use markdown. Use plain text.
  • Make this the First Word or Last Word. No thanks. (get credits or sign in to see balance)    
  • Remember name/email/url (set a cookie)

Close

Add A Reply

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here



Subscribe to the Techdirt Daily newsletter




Comment Options:

  • Use markdown. Use plain text.
  • Make this the First Word or Last Word. No thanks. (get credits or sign in to see balance)    
  • Remember name/email/url (set a cookie)

Follow Techdirt
Advertisment

Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.