Internet Hunting Becomes The Hunted

from the step-away-from-the-mouse dept

The idea of Internet "hunting" has many people -- hunters included -- up in arms (so to speak). Now lawmakers in several states are pushing legislation to outlaw the practice, by requiring shooters to be present at the scene of the hunt and in possession of the firearm at the time of the shooting. The CEO of the Humane Society of the United States wants the federal government to get involved, even raising the issue of homeland security. Though it's understandable that 'net hunting would be considered offensive (or at least particularly unsporting) by many, the whole thing sounds pretty absurd. How many people are seriously dropping 300 bucks to click a mouse and... um... drop a buck? Has it really become such an issue that state governments and the US Congress really need to get involved?

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

  • identicon
    Jon, 25 Mar 2005 @ 6:12pm

    Re: Hunting

    Glad you are covering this topic and got to link to my blog. Have a good day!

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    crystalattice (profile), 27 Mar 2005 @ 2:37pm

    Only in America

    I don't have an issue w/ hunting per se, but canned hunts are crap. It seems along the lines of bear-baiting, fox hunting, bull fighting, and other "sports" where the animals don't have a fair chance. IMHO, they would do better to ban canned hunting than Internet hunting.
    Internet hunting might actually be better because you have to wait for the animal to come into view rather than actively chasing it; if they charged by the minute or hour, it could be very profitable.
    One way they could regulate it is to only allow one bullet per person and giving you a cheap scope. They could regulate it so much that it would be very difficult to actually kill an animal remotely.
    The argument about "homeland security" is just plain crap. I hate how everything nowadays always comes back to terrorism. The US needs to get over itself and realize that, if American policy didn't "require" us to be the world's police and get involved in other countries issues, maybe we wouldn't be the "Great Satan". I honestly don't believe terrorists care about remote hunting; they've got bombs.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    John C, 28 Mar 2005 @ 5:38pm

    Internet Hunting

    Involve Congress on Internet hunting? Homeland Security? Ha! I wouldn't hunt critters this way unless they were Congress-critters.

    Leave Congress out of this and we will depopulate the hallowed halls in quick-time.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Use markdown for basic formatting. HTML is no longer supported.
  Save me a cookie
Follow Techdirt
Techdirt Gear
Shop Now: Copying Is Not Theft
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Chat
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Recent Stories
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads


Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.