by Mike Masnick

Regulating Political Speech Online?

from the bad-ideas dept

Michael S. Malone is trying to bring to light a federal judge's ruling from last year that didn't get very much attention. Apparently, U.S. District Judge, Colleen Kollar-Kotelly (whose name you might recognize from the Microsoft anti-trust suit) ruled that, despite it clearly not being mentioned in the law, the internet should be restricted by the McCain-Feingold Act, effectively regulating political campaigning online. The ruling, basically, was that it wouldn't make sense for the internet to be excluded, since that would defeat the purpose of the law. However, as Malone points out, it basically treats the internet as if it were a broadcast medium, rather than a communications one -- and creates a serious problem for free speech issues. The point he makes is that, since anyone can publish online, the system helps work out the problems itself: "Pick a viewpoint, no matter how nutty, and it will be there on the Web -- and counterbalanced by 20,000 contrary arguments. It is a forum that demands not more regulation, but less; not more oversight, but more sunlight. Not mandated disclosure, but competitive exposure of misbehavior." Every election season, we see increasingly innovative uses of the internet in campaigns to help bring up issues and involve more people in the process. Regulating the internet when it comes to campaigns could effectively kill that ongoing evolution of the tool.

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

  • identicon
    dorpus, 17 Feb 2005 @ 2:55pm

    What about extremism?

    Extremists will find company on the net. Over in Japan, there is now a whole subculture of "2ch-ers" who compete to make bigger boasts about the joys of mass murder, or other terroristic acts. Police have cracked down when the threats got too specific, but overall, there is now a greater pool of knowledge on how to commit mass terrorism, and greater camaraderie among people who enjoy such thoughts.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    gp, 17 Feb 2005 @ 3:15pm

    No Subject Given

    Many first amendment specialists already believe McCain-Feingold to infringe on pure political speech, why shouldn't that travesty also apply to political speech voiced on the Internet?

    Maybe the Net community will be more successful in highlighting the issue than the political community has been.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Use markdown for basic formatting. HTML is no longer supported.
  Save me a cookie
Follow Techdirt
Techdirt Gear
Shop Now: Techdirt Logo Gear
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Chat
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Recent Stories
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads


Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.