Supreme Court Upholds Anti-Porn Filters

from the find-somewhere-else-to-surf dept

Last year, we were happy to report that a tribunal of federal judges in Philadelphia seemed to understand the problems with forced filtering and said that libraries shouldn't be forced to filter content because they blocked too many perfectly reasonable sites - often the type of sites that would be very useful for people to have access to. The Department of Justice, however, considered their crusade and appealed the case to the Supreme Court. Today the Supreme Court overturned the tribunal and said there's nothing wrong with federally mandated censorship even when it's blocking perfectly reasonable sites. The worst thing about this is that there have been some very good "middle-ground" suggestions - such as setting up filtered machines for young kids, and leaving uncensored machines for adults. However, because the government doesn't want you looking up information in public about breast cancer, you'll be forced to do so in your own home (because, apparently, you should be ashamed of the word "breast"). If you don't happen to have a computer or internet access in your home, then you're stuck. Update: Here are some excerpts from the ruling and the dissent. The majority ruling basically says that no one is burdened by this since you can just ask the librarian to turn off the filter (something many people will be too embarrassed to do - even if they are searching for legitimate info). The dissent points out that there are much less restrictive methods to accomplish this goal. More importantly, since no filter is ever going to block all porn, this will give parents a "false sense of security", and does little to attack the real problem. Another update: Library officials are responding by saying that this ruling is going to be very costly, without doing anything to address the real issue. They say that the filters will be expensive to install and maintain, and don't do much to prevent access to pornography.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread



Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here



Subscribe to the Techdirt Daily newsletter




Comment Options:

  • Use markdown. Use plain text.
  • Remember name/email/url (set a cookie)

Close

Add A Reply

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here



Subscribe to the Techdirt Daily newsletter




Comment Options:

  • Use markdown. Use plain text.
  • Remember name/email/url (set a cookie)

Follow Techdirt
Special Affiliate Offer

Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Chat
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Recent Stories
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.