Deep Linking Again

from the please.--make-it-stop dept

We already pointed out that the deep linking question has returned lately - but I was just hoping it was a European thing, and that folks in the US had realized that there's absolutely nothing wrong with deep linking. Instead, here's a story about a newspaper in Dallas that has told another site to stop deep linking to their articles. This is still ridiculous. If they don't want people linking to them they should get off the web. This guy is sending them more traffic. Even if they don't like what he's saying, it's stupid to tell people they're infringing on copyright by linking to them. Also, what I really don't understand about any of these cases is why they don't just use a technology solution. It's easy enough to block all links from a certain location if they're so stupid to want to turn away traffic.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • identicon
    2Lazy2Register, 1 May 2002 @ 5:42am

    Huh?

    If it's copyright they're so worried about, why don't they just put copyright info on each page?? I suspect it's more related to a perceived loss of banner ad income, which is probably measured by hits to the top page. Have you ever noticed how many ads there are in a paper newspaper? It's something like 80 - 90%!

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Peter F Bradshaw, 1 May 2002 @ 7:50am

    No Subject Given

    I must admit that I'm confused. Whether a deep link works or not is under the control of the object site (in thi scase the Dallas Morning News). If a http request for a deep linked page arrives they can simply rewrite it to their home page - or what ever. Where's the problem?

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Bob, 1 May 2002 @ 8:44am

    agreeement

    The company i work for had the same problem with people enhancing their own web sites by deep-linking. We dealt with it exactly the same way Mike described -- we wrote a script that shuts out the offending domain names and saved our legal department a bundle.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 1 May 2002 @ 10:17am

      Re: agreeement

      Ok, so this probably is because I have no idea what your company does, but how exactly is deep linking a problem in the first place? Do you not like the fact that other websites are sending you traffic that you otherwise would never get?

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        sb, 1 May 2002 @ 10:22am

        Re: agreeement

        perhaps they want ALL USERS of their site to go thru a certain path. They want control of this. The banner ads are an example of this.

        also, perhaps they dont have programming staff on hand who can make the changes to their site. perhaps they have cheap lawyers , and they feel this is a more inexpensive route

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        • identicon
          john, 1 May 2002 @ 10:39am

          Re: agreeement

          Maybe a good use of the DNS would be to somehow bin things up in such a way that there is an actual World Wide Web in the original spirit under one set of TLDs, and then the World Wide Media Empire under some other set.

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

          • identicon
            jbg, 1 May 2002 @ 3:20pm

            Re: agreeement

            Dallas Morning News online is a joke anyway. I don't even visit the site as 50% of any clicks on the homepage require you to register for their content. That coupled with pop-under ads!

            They are scared that they can't play with the big news web sites and they are right.

            I guess an RSS feed is out of the question? ;)

            reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        bob, 7 May 2002 @ 7:13am

        Re: agreeement

        Not all web sites exist to draw traffic; In our case, a web site was linking to a moving sample arhive we have set up for potential clients. We don't have advertisements on our site, so getting more traffic isn't the point -- getting the right kind of traffic is.

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here



Subscribe to the Techdirt Daily newsletter




Comment Options:

  • Use markdown. Use plain text.
  • Remember name/email/url (set a cookie)

Close

Add A Reply

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here



Subscribe to the Techdirt Daily newsletter




Comment Options:

  • Use markdown. Use plain text.
  • Remember name/email/url (set a cookie)

Follow Techdirt
Insider Shop - Show Your Support!

Essential Reading
Techdirt Insider Chat
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.