GameStop CEO Appears To Be Auctioning Off Video Game History
from the scattered-to-the-wind dept
By now you likely have caught wind of GameStop, the video game and collectables retailer, announcing a bid to buy eBay. Perhaps you heard of this, as I did, because of GameStop’s CEO, Ryan Cohen, showing up to CNBC’s Squawk Box program where he pulled off one of the strangest interviews about business I’ve ever seen.
In a six-minute interview with CNBC‘s Andrew Ross Sorkin, Cohen gave a series of mostly incoherent responses to the most basic questions, unable to provide any decipherable reasons why a flailing video game retail chain that’s relied on meme stocks and Pokémon cards for its recent survival would even think of trying to buy a massively larger, international e-commerce company. When asked by CNBC, “So you’ve built up a stake in this company already, you’ve had conversations with the company? You’ve tried? What’s happening here?” there’s a deeply awkward pause before Cohen, in his mid-life-crisis black leather jacket, says “…No.” Then after another glacial pause, “We’re just starting,” followed by a very peculiar smirk.
It got stranger and more passive aggressive from there. Cohen indicated that through a stock issuance the company would directly put up $20 billion for the purchase, along with another $20 billion from investors. The problem is that the eBay purchase would require roughly $56 billion. It doesn’t take a professor in advanced mathematics to see the issue here.
Cohen seemed to approach the entire interview with an affected air of disgust and disdain, as if it’s just so beneath him to even have to answer questions based on his announcements. The mini-Musk rolls his eyes and glibly dismisses reasonable questions, which was going badly enough until Sorkin asked the most obvious question of all: “How does the math math?” How does around $20 billion from GameStop and $20 billion from an investor get close to $56 billion? “Half cash, half stock” Cohen replies, after more eye rolling and disdain. And then he appears to get stuck in a loop, like a rubbish sleepy robot.
Watch the entire interview if you like, but it’s pretty hard to get through it, honestly.
Going along with that very bizarre interview was the sudden appearance of all kinds of video game memorabilia, with some of it appearing to come directly from the “vault” that had been kept by GameStop’s Game Informer magazine, before Cohen shuttered it.
The stunt follows criticisms that the executive doesn’t have enough cash to actually make that acquisition. But it appears that at least some of the items being auctioned could be remnants looted from the legendary Game Informer Vault, where the long-running publication housed decades of video game history before GameStop shut down the publication in 2024.
Sources close to the situation who spoke under the condition of anonymity told Kotaku that while some of the products in Cohen’s eBay listings, such as the baseball cards, weren’t from the Game Informer Vault, other items, including some rare retro games, likely were. Some details like the sticky tab on the front of the sealed copy of Dracula for the NES and the sealed casings on copies of Yoshi’s Cookie and F1 Pole Position match photos and descriptions from the Vault verified by Kotaku.
Now, the Kotaku article suggests that Cohen is selling these items as an effort to raise money for the eBay bid. That’s a very silly thing to suggest. We’re talking about a $16 billion shortfall, unless Cohen plans to seriously dilute the stock value of current shareholders. Historical gaming items like we’re talking about, while certainly of import and value, aren’t going to net you $16 billion.
But it’s worth noting how cavalier Cohen is being here with very real gaming history and culture. It’s not surprise that the Video Game History Foundation and others are pointing out how an eBay auction like this is going to scatter all of this cultural history to the wind, and what a shame that is.
Video Game History Foundation founder Frank Cifaldi posted on Bluesky accusing Cohen of selling off items from the Vault. Though Game Informer has since returned as a print publication after the outlet was acquired and revived by Gunzilla Games in 2025, the Vault and all the contents found inside remained GameStop property.
“I’m very happy Game Informer is out from under GameStop, but choices like these remind people of the brutal closure of the magazine in 2024,” MinnMax founder and ex-Game Informer video producer Ben Hanson said in a statement to Kotaku. “Game Informer‘s history belongs in a museum, not some schmuck’s eBay listings. Show some love to the current Game Informer crew, subscribe to the physical magazine, and please try to ignore Ryan Cohen’s pleas for attention.”
Will GameStop actually buy eBay? I very much doubt it. I don’t think the company can pull off this kind of leverage while maintaining a credit rating post-acquisition that would satisfy the banking investment requirements as outlined in Cohen’s own financing letter. Moody’s doesn’t seem to think so, either.
Somewhat hilariously, Cohen’s own eBay account was also suspended shortly after he began auctioning these items off. But if he really wants to sell off the Game Informer vault, he’ll find a way. And that is a damned shame from a gaming preservation standpoint.
Filed Under: ryan cohen, wtf
Companies: ebay, gamestop


Comments on “GameStop CEO Appears To Be Auctioning Off Video Game History”
I say good. Better someone else, anyone else, has those items. Let the fool (and the fools who give him money expecting more in return) and his money soon be parted.
Re:
If anyone should have those items, it’s literally the Video Game History Foundation. And they should be donated, not sold, to the foundation.
Re: Re:
And if you had the money to buy them, you could decide that. But you don’t so you can’t.
There “should” is a very useless word, here.
Re: Re: Re:
You’re right, I fucked up. I’m sorry. It won’t happen again.
Re: Re:
Or have Gunzilla take em.
Re: Re:
But the physical items belong to GameStop right now.
Re: Re: Re:
Yes, and for now they’re all together as a collection. You’re advocating for the collection to be split up and auctioned off piecemeal to private collectors, and you believe this would be better, for reasons you haven’t explained.
Re: Re: Re:2
So it’s better languishing in a storage locker, so long as the “collection” is in one piece?
Re:
I…what?
It kinda seems like you didn’t think your choice of aphorisms through here.
See, the problem is, is you view him and shareholders as human. They have more in common with serial killers or demons from other planes.
They see nothing of value in anything besides its monetary value.
Re:
Everyone with a retirement plan is a “shareholder,” FYI.
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
All that stuff was just sitting in a warehouse. There’s nothing wrong with selling it off, Gamestop is not obligated to do anything else.
If someone wants to put together a coalition and buy this stuff for a museum, that’s fine, but otherwise it’s just taking up space.
This article is very stupid, beyond pointing out that Kotaku is stupid for thinking this could seriously add funds to buy ebay.
Re: This article is very stupid
As stupid as you not knowing that 20 and 20 don’t make 56?
Re:
You’re very stupid for missing the point entirely.
Re:
…. And you are a pos who is part of the problem
Re:
You’ve heard the phrase ‘too busy questioning whether they can to question whether they should’? Thats you right here. Too busy questioning whether he can to question whether he should.
That was painful, like watching Trump talk stairs
The only thing missing from his responses is blaming Biden for any potential issues with the deal. Some MAGA crony would eat it up and invest the rest of the cash.
Article seems overly harsh. They’re collectors items being sold to collectors, that’s pretty far from “scattering them into the wind”.
Also, how can you loot your own vault? Is it better if these things never see the light of day? Guess it would be better for them to stop selling any collectibles and give them all to a museum?
Game informer was great back in the day, but there’s no moral imperative that it stays operational while losing money. Maybe the museum should subsidize it?
Obvious fud is obvious. Power to the players.
Re:
Criticising someone for selling game memorabilia to supposedly pull cash together for a massive takeover bid isn’t FUD.
If you think selling game memorabilia to whomever will buy it, thereby scattering it and locking it down, as opposed to a conservation organisation giving anyone access to it is giving “power to the players”, you clearly don’t know what that phrase means.
Re:
Question with as harsh as I can make it.
How would you like your child’s grave to be the center piece of some rich asshole?
Because that’s what happen to stuff like this. That’s where a ton of historic items around the world are. It will be locked away in other private vaults, traded back and forth, or even lost and destroyed.
It might not all be of the highest historic or cultural value, but some of it very much is.
GameStop wants to get in on microtransactions and they are going to sell loot boxes to finance it.
$16 billion?
Sorkin: But where will you get the missing $16 billion?
Cohen, rolling eyes: Pffft. I’ll check the couch for loose change. Duh.