MAGA Zealots Are Waging War On Affordable Broadband
from the fuck-the-poor dept
The Trump administration keeps demonstrating that it really hates affordable broadband. It particularly hates it when the government tries to make broadband affordable to poor people or rural school kids.
In just the last year the Trump administration has:
- Rewritten the infrastructure Act at the behest of telecom giants, ensuring that they can take $42.5 billion in taxpayer money without worrying about making sure the resulting broadband is affordable.
- Illegally threatened to withhold broadband grants from states that try to hold telecom monopolies accountable for overbilling or anti-competitive behavior.
- Destroyed a popular program that provided free broadband to poor rural school children.
- Tried relentlessly to destroy an FCC program that provides cheaper broadband to schools and rural communities (many of which voted for Trump).
- Dismantled the FCC’s ability to stop telecom giants from ripping you off with hidden fees and usage caps.
- Illegally destroyed a law passed by Congress mandating the fair deployment of broadband to poor people and minority communities.
- Hijacked a program aimed at providing affordable fiber in order to slather Elon Musk with subsidies.
I’m sure I missed a few.
This week, the administration’s war on affordable broadband shifted back to attacking the FCC Lifeline program, a traditionally uncontroversial, bipartisan effort to try and extend broadband to low income Americans. Brendan Carr (R, AT&T) has been ramping up his attacks on these programs, claiming (falsely) that they’re riddled with state-sanctioned fraud:
“Carr’s office said this week that the FCC will vote next month on rule changes to ensure that Lifeline money goes to “only living and lawful Americans” who meet low-income eligibility guidelines. Lifeline spends nearly $1 billion a year and gives eligible households up to $9.25 per month toward phone and Internet bills, or up to $34.25 per month in tribal areas.”
For one, $9.25 is a pittance. It barely offsets the incredibly high prices U.S. telecom monopolies charge. Monopolies, it should be noted, only exist thanks to the coddling of decades of corrupt lawmakers like Carr, who’ve effectively exempted them from all accountability. That’s resulted in heavy monopolization, limited competition, high prices, and low-quality service.
Two, there’s lots of fraud in telecom. Most of it, unfortunately, is conducted by our biggest companies with the tacit approval of folks like FCC boss Brendan Carr. AT&T, for example, has spent decades ripping off U.S. schools and various subsidy programs, and you’ll never see Carr make a peep about that. Fraud is, in MAGA world, only something involving minorities and poor people.
The irony is that the lion’s share of the fraud in the Lifeline program has involved big telecom giants, like AT&T or Verizon, which, time and time again, take taxpayer money for poor people that the just made up. This sort of fraud, where corporations are involved, isn’t of interest to Brendan Carr.
In this case, Carr is alleging (without evidence) that certain left wing states are intentionally ripping off the federal government, throwing untold millions of dollars at dead people for Lifeline broadband access. Something the California Public Utilities Commission has had to spend the week debunking:
“The California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) this week said that “people pass away while enrolled in Lifeline—in California and in red states like Texas. That’s not fraud. That’s the reality of administering a large public program serving millions of Americans over many years. The FCC’s own advisory acknowledges that the vast majority of California subscribers were eligible and enrolled while alive, and that any improper payments largely reflect lag time between a death and account closure, not failures at enrollment.”
Brendan Carr can’t overtly admit this (because he’s a corrupt zealot), but his ideal telecom policy agenda involves throwing billions of dollars at AT&T and Comcast in exchange for doing nothing. That’s it. That’s the grand Republican plan for U.S. telecom. It gets dressed up as something more ideologically rigid, but coddling predatory monopolies has always been the foundational belief structure.
This latest effort by Carr and Trump largely appears to be a political gambit targeting California Governor Gavin Newsom, suggesting they’re worried about his chances in the next presidential election. This isn’t to defend Newsom; I’ve certainly noted how his state has a mixed track record on broadband affordability. But it appears this is mostly about painting a picture of Newsom, as they did with Walz in Minnesota, as a political opponent that just really loves taxpayer fraud.
Again though, actually policing fraud is genuinely the last thing on Brendan Carr’s mind. If it was, he’d actually target the worst culprits on this front: corporate America.
Filed Under: affordability, brendan carr, broadband, fraud, lifeline, telecom


Comments on “MAGA Zealots Are Waging War On Affordable Broadband”
Why aim at Maga?
Well they seem to NOT understand ANY general logic based on 3rd grade Logic.
I wonder if they are Against the MONEY that the gov is paying Out, and HAS paid out Multiple times to those responsible.
WHy not Just DEMAND the Corps to DO something, Because if they dont, the Gov will remove the backbone from access to the CORPS.
It wasnt that long ago, that the Gov. had a good handle on the Phone system. Then they added the Net, and then the Cellphones to the WHOLE things and the Gov. PAID to update the Whole backbone.
Re:
It’s simple: MAGA’s goal is to eliminate government. They’ve said as much in so many words since the mid-70s. They’ve OK with government taking money from other people and giving it to them, but they’d really rather cut out the middle-man and do it themselves. Their original motto was “Starve the beast.”, referring to starving government of funds to do anything.
Re: Re: I see
But this is more a Corp/Rich person Coverup of REALITY. Where the corps and rich are the ones getting all the money and DONT give a Flying Frick about the poor.
This is like the Company Job Cuts in late 80’s thru 90’s, and BLAMING the gov for it.
Those workers Cant see how 1 Big corp is buying out the Other companies and then Slash and Burn them.
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Government “free” or “affordable” anything does not make it either of those things. It is invariably more expensive (usually a LOT more) with disguised cost.
All your socialist dreams are bad.
Re:
No, you’re thinking of the current state of broadband. The state that the current admin is doing everything it can to maintain.
Re: Re:
It only got more expensive cuz of government intervention, retard.
Re: Re: Re:
You misspelled “deregulation.”
Re: Re: Re:
Yes, yes, four legs good, government bad.
Re:
In the UK the government funded broadband companies to roll out fibre.
I now have a choice of three different fibre networks at my home and as a result there is competition and I get 1 gbit symmetrical broadband for £24 per month.
So it is possible for governments to do these things, it’s just maybe the US political system won’t allow progress.
Re: It's all about efficiency.
You’d rather the extra charges be renamed overage fees or traffic throttling and be diverted to the shareholders because it’s more efficient.
Re:
Okay, so, let’s get rid of everything paid for with our taxes. We can start wth all the police departments, all the fire departments, and Social Security. After all, that last one even has “social” in its name.
REALITY SAYS
When A barrel of Oil cost $25 and Gas was $0.35 per gallon,
And you Dont notice that the Current price is $75. That 3×0.35= $1.05, NOT $3.
You Dont have to Wonder HOW they make RECORD PROFITS, by selling the oil Twice.
Urgent note for Brendan... :)
Dear Brendan Carr,
You studied Burke at Georgetown.
Burke’s whole thesis was: “Don’t eat all the feed corn or heads come off.”
You’re eating children’s educational Wi-Fi to feed AT&T shareholders.
Burke would build the guillotine for you himself.
He wasn’t defending extraction.
He was advocating STRATEGIC CONCESSIONS TO PREVENT REVOLUTION.
You can’t even give poor kids homework internet.
That’s not Burkean conservatism.
That’s pre-Burke French aristocracy.
And we know how that ended.
Regards,
Someone Who Actually Read Burke