Trump Administration Stomps All Over The Hatch Act With Shutdown Website Banners And Away Messages

from the lock-them-up dept

The Hatch Act of 1939 is a beautiful piece of legislation. It disallows all kinds of things, like bribing voters with jobs to vote a certain way, as well as limiting any campaign activity by federal workers. Another thing it does is to prohibit partisan political activity in the course of a staff member’s federal employment duties. An IRS agent, for instance, can’t tell someone going through an audit that their taxes are so high because “the Democrat or Republican party sucks and they hate you.” The idea is that we want federal employees carrying out their duties in a non-partisan manner.

Well, Donald Trump’s administration just took a big old dump on the Hatch Act. As you’ll know, the federal government is currently in a shutdown due to Congress collectively being unable to pass a funding bill to keep it open. As is typical, both parties have rushed to play the blame game and label the shutdown as the other party’s responsibility. It’s dumb, because they are both responsible to one degree or another, but c’est l’amerique. Well, the administration has apparently been telling its various departments, and in some cases forcing it upon them, to alter web banners and out of office messages to specifically blame Democrats for the shutdown.

We’ll start with the away messages.

But some departments have pressed their employees to change these “out of office” notices to explicitly blame Democrats for the shutdown. At the Department of Education, things have apparently gone even further, with numerous employees complaining on social media that their out-of-office messages were changed, without their consent, to this:

Thank you for contacting me. On September 19, 2025, the House of Representatives passed H.R. 5371, a clean continuing resolution. Unfortunately, Democrat Senators are blocking passage of H.R. 5371 in the Senate which has led to a lapse in appropriations. Due to the lapse in appropriations I am currently in furlough status. I will respond to emails once government functions resume.

CNN talked to one Department of Education employee who “said they went into their email system twice over the last 24 hours to change the automatic message to a generic one, but it was reverted back to the message blaming Democrats.”

That right there? That’s a Hatch Act violation. Plain as day, we don’t have to argue about it, there’s no nuance to consider. It’s just a Hatch Act violation foisted upon federal workers that are already being furloughed because the man-child currently running our government wanted it done.

And this isn’t just the DoE. HHS and the SBA, and I’m certain many others as well, also have these away messages that include partisan criticism of one party at the demand of the other. And bullshit explanations like this are completely invalid.

When asked about its suggested out-of-office message blaming Democrats, the Department of Health and Human Services told CNN that yes, it had suggested this—but added that this was okay because the partisan message was accurate.

“Employees were instructed to use out-of-office messages that reflect the truth: Democrats have shut the government down,” the agency said.

Pure, frontier gibberish. I can’t stress this enough: this isn’t complicated. This is an open and shut violation of the Hatch Act.

As is what the administration splashed all over government agency websites, as well.

Department websites have also gotten in on the partisan action. The Department of Housing and Urban Development’s site now loads with a large floating box atop the page, which reads, “The Radical Left in Congress shut down the government.” When you close the box, you see atop the main page itself an eye-searingly red banner that says… the same thing. Thanks, I think we got it!

Over at the Small Business Administration, a banner atop the main page really makes sure to drive the partisanship home by blaming Democrats twice and praising Trump once:

Senate Democrats voted to block a clean federal funding bill (H.R. 5371), leading to a government shutdown that is preventing the U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA) from serving America’s 36 million small businesses. Every day that Senate Democrats continue to oppose a clean funding bill, they are stopping an estimated 320 small businesses from accessing $170 million in SBA-guaranteed funding…

As soon as the shutdown is over, we are prepared to immediately return to the record-breaking services we were providing under the leadership of the Trump Administration.

Somewhat hilariously, a similar banner is shown over at the site that specifically instructs DOJ employees to adhere to the Hatch Act as it applies to them.

As if irony isn’t already dead, the Hatch Act violation on the DOJ website, which blames Democrats for the shutdown, appears on the page advising DOJ employees they are subject to the Hatch Act. joycevance.substack.com/p/a-note-abo…

Joyce White Vance (@joycewhitevance.bsky.social) 2025-10-03T02:00:00.613Z

That’s the sort of thing that would make even Orwell blush. And, ultimately, this shit isn’t funny. The Hatch Act exists for a reason and the erosion of it isn’t to be sneezed at. If this administration can get away with violating the portion of the law that prohibits partisan preaching from the workplace, why not the part about bribing voters? Republican kind of tried to do something like that already, if you’ll recall. Or how about the part about campaigning for a specific party or candidate while on the job? What will prevent the administration from making it a work requirement for every federal worker to vocally support one party in the midterms?

It’s going to be really important to see who, and how, those in the other branches of our government demand accountability for this flagrant violation of law.

Filed Under: , , , , , , ,

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Trump Administration Stomps All Over The Hatch Act With Shutdown Website Banners And Away Messages”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
21 Comments
Kinetic Gothic says:

Trump spent his first term in office systematically violating the Hatch Act.

https://osc.gov/Documents/Hatch%20Act/Reports/Investigation%20of%20Political%20Activities%20by%20Senior%20Trump%20Administration%20Officials%20During%20the%202020%20Presidential%20Election.pdf

Did you seriously think he was going to follow it in his more unhinged second term?

And these OoO messages are just cherry on top on the cake, compared to Voight’s OMB systematically targeting federal money going to blue states, to be held up during the shutdown, and targerted RIF’s at “Democrat” Agencies.

Anonymous Coward says:

Penalty

Since it wasn’t written here or on the linked Wikipedia page, here are [the penalties (5 U.S.C. § 7326)[https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/5/7326]:

An employee or individual who violates section 7323 or 7324 shall be subject to—
(1) disciplinary action consisting of removal, reduction in grade, debarment from Federal employment for a period not to exceed 5 years, suspension, or reprimand;
(2) an assessment of a civil penalty not to exceed $1,000; or
(3) any combination of the penalties described in paragraph (1) or (2).

So, if these actions could be tied directly to Trump’s orders, it would actually allow the removal of Trump and all complicit subordinates from office, with no option to serve again before about 2031. (And wouldn’t it just be bizarre if this were the thing to bring down the administration?) Alternately, someone could put an official reprimand in everyone’s file and take no other action.

This comment has been deemed insightful by the community.
MrWilson (profile) says:

Re:

The problem is that SCOTUS basically said Trump is immune for “official acts” and failed to qualify exactly what is an official act, and SCOTUS has already shown its majority is fine with shutting down limiting efforts in the courts with the stroke of a shadow docket pen.

My money on Trump leaving office early is either him dying from his circulation issues or Vance seeing an opportunity and pulling a 25th Amendment move, but only with the backing of other ambitious, greedy assholes to help him pull it off successfully.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re:

My money on Trump leaving office early […]

Given how the current administration has been promoting guns and violence, we also can’t rule out a crazy person causing an early end to this presidency. I’m not gonna suggest it or put money on it; it just seems like something that could happen. (Plus, the Secret Service was targeted by DOGE in April, though I’m not finding anything about whether layoffs actually happened.)

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re: Re:

The Hatch Act doesn’t apply to the President and Vice President.

Damn. You’re right: “(1) ‘employee’ means any individual, other than the President and the Vice President, employed or holding office …”

Still, anyone else who followed these illegal orders (presumably from the President) could be fired. Maybe. Some question remains about how much power the higher-ups (in the executive branch) have to decide the punishment.

Also, even though this act doesn’t apply to the President and VP per se, I feel like there ought to be some law against ordering subordinates to violate laws.

Something Anon uo there should have found out when he looked up the text of the law.

It’s spread across like 7 pages, which makes that annoying-to-difficult; a very “claustrophobic” web experience. Doubly so if one clicks “employee”, which results in a sub-page of the (already very short) “definitions” page, with only that one definition.

TheOldHippie (profile) says:

And the VA gets in on the action

This was in the email I received from the VA on Oct 1:

/quote

As you may be aware, funding for some government agencies, including portions of the Department of Veterans Affairs, expired at midnight this morning.

President Trump opposes a lapse in appropriations, and on September 19, the House of Representatives passed, with the Trump Administration’s support, a clean continuing resolution to fund the government through November 21. Unfortunately, Democrats are blocking this Continuing Resolution in the U.S. Senate due to unrelated policy demands.

During the current lapse in funding, the vast majority of VA benefits and services will continue uninterrupted, but the government shutdown is not without consequences to VA.

/end quote

It’s like this administration (regime) has yet to find a law that it can’t ignore.

eager_pebble (profile) says:

The Hatch Act WOULD be a beautiful piece of legislation if it had teeth. Unfortunately, it can only result in job impact (controlled ultimately by the political party in power) or a $1000 civil judgement. So it’s mildly useful if the actions of the employee are NOT aligned with the party in power. Otherwise, it seems (as we’ve seen for the last decade) little more than a phrase for pundits to throw around.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re:

Unfortunately, it can only result in job impact (controlled ultimately by the political party in power)

I couldn’t find much information on how the penalty is decided. Do you have a reference for it being controlled by The Party? “Job impact” would actually be great if imposed on Trump by a court. Like, “you’re fired and can’t hold a government office for the next 5 years” (thus being ineligible for any further Presidency before 2033, even if the term limit can be worked around).

eager_pebble (profile) says:

Re: Re:

Here’s the penalties section of the code:

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/5/7326

Basically, you can be fired or suspended or reprimanded. The problem with the Hatch Act (as I understand it, as I am not a lawyer) is that it is enforced by your reporting chain for your job. The vast majority of federal government reporting chains end in a political appointee.

In other words, I don’t think the courts are involved unless there’s a civil penalty, which can not exceed $1000.

oldVermonter (profile) says:

...and the Forest Service follows

Take a look at this webpage:

https://www.fs.usda.gov/r09/gmfl/projects

The header reads:

The Radical Left Democrats shut down the government. This government website will be updated periodically during the funding lapse for mission critical functions. President Trump has made it clear he wants to keep the government open and support those who feed, fuel, and clothe the American people.

No political bias here!

Anonymous Coward says:

Hatch Act Penalties

Golly gee, guess they’ll hafta go be a lobbyist for a few years. And $1,000 – ooh, that hurts, really. Ouch.

It really is remarkable how lenient the penalty clauses are on ‘offenses committed under color of government’. Not surprising – just remarkable.

Howzabout the next one have “Shall be found guilty of a felony and imprisoned for no less than 25 years and no more than life, and fined 50% of their net worth or $50,000,000, adjusted for inflation from the day this is enacted, whichever is less.”

Oh, and like everyone else who can’t pay the fine, they get their wages garnished, assets seized, &c…

That One Guy (profile) says:

If you feel the need to force someone to say something...

On the one hand this is yet another blatant violation of the law and attempt to weaponize the government against the regime’s political opponents.

On the other hand it also shows their hand in that they felt they had to get people to blame the government because otherwise they weren’t going to do so, which really gives away the game.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get all our posts in your inbox with the Techdirt Daily Newsletter!

We don’t spam. Read our privacy policy for more info.

Ctrl-Alt-Speech

A weekly news podcast from
Mike Masnick & Ben Whitelaw

Subscribe now to Ctrl-Alt-Speech »
Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Loading...