Trump Administration Stomps All Over The Hatch Act With Shutdown Website Banners And Away Messages
from the lock-them-up dept
The Hatch Act of 1939 is a beautiful piece of legislation. It disallows all kinds of things, like bribing voters with jobs to vote a certain way, as well as limiting any campaign activity by federal workers. Another thing it does is to prohibit partisan political activity in the course of a staff member’s federal employment duties. An IRS agent, for instance, can’t tell someone going through an audit that their taxes are so high because “the Democrat or Republican party sucks and they hate you.” The idea is that we want federal employees carrying out their duties in a non-partisan manner.
Well, Donald Trump’s administration just took a big old dump on the Hatch Act. As you’ll know, the federal government is currently in a shutdown due to Congress collectively being unable to pass a funding bill to keep it open. As is typical, both parties have rushed to play the blame game and label the shutdown as the other party’s responsibility. It’s dumb, because they are both responsible to one degree or another, but c’est l’amerique. Well, the administration has apparently been telling its various departments, and in some cases forcing it upon them, to alter web banners and out of office messages to specifically blame Democrats for the shutdown.
We’ll start with the away messages.
But some departments have pressed their employees to change these “out of office” notices to explicitly blame Democrats for the shutdown. At the Department of Education, things have apparently gone even further, with numerous employees complaining on social media that their out-of-office messages were changed, without their consent, to this:
Thank you for contacting me. On September 19, 2025, the House of Representatives passed H.R. 5371, a clean continuing resolution. Unfortunately, Democrat Senators are blocking passage of H.R. 5371 in the Senate which has led to a lapse in appropriations. Due to the lapse in appropriations I am currently in furlough status. I will respond to emails once government functions resume.
CNN talked to one Department of Education employee who “said they went into their email system twice over the last 24 hours to change the automatic message to a generic one, but it was reverted back to the message blaming Democrats.”
That right there? That’s a Hatch Act violation. Plain as day, we don’t have to argue about it, there’s no nuance to consider. It’s just a Hatch Act violation foisted upon federal workers that are already being furloughed because the man-child currently running our government wanted it done.
And this isn’t just the DoE. HHS and the SBA, and I’m certain many others as well, also have these away messages that include partisan criticism of one party at the demand of the other. And bullshit explanations like this are completely invalid.
When asked about its suggested out-of-office message blaming Democrats, the Department of Health and Human Services told CNN that yes, it had suggested this—but added that this was okay because the partisan message was accurate.
“Employees were instructed to use out-of-office messages that reflect the truth: Democrats have shut the government down,” the agency said.
Pure, frontier gibberish. I can’t stress this enough: this isn’t complicated. This is an open and shut violation of the Hatch Act.
As is what the administration splashed all over government agency websites, as well.
Department websites have also gotten in on the partisan action. The Department of Housing and Urban Development’s site now loads with a large floating box atop the page, which reads, “The Radical Left in Congress shut down the government.” When you close the box, you see atop the main page itself an eye-searingly red banner that says… the same thing. Thanks, I think we got it!
Over at the Small Business Administration, a banner atop the main page really makes sure to drive the partisanship home by blaming Democrats twice and praising Trump once:
Senate Democrats voted to block a clean federal funding bill (H.R. 5371), leading to a government shutdown that is preventing the U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA) from serving America’s 36 million small businesses. Every day that Senate Democrats continue to oppose a clean funding bill, they are stopping an estimated 320 small businesses from accessing $170 million in SBA-guaranteed funding…
As soon as the shutdown is over, we are prepared to immediately return to the record-breaking services we were providing under the leadership of the Trump Administration.
Somewhat hilariously, a similar banner is shown over at the site that specifically instructs DOJ employees to adhere to the Hatch Act as it applies to them.
That’s the sort of thing that would make even Orwell blush. And, ultimately, this shit isn’t funny. The Hatch Act exists for a reason and the erosion of it isn’t to be sneezed at. If this administration can get away with violating the portion of the law that prohibits partisan preaching from the workplace, why not the part about bribing voters? Republican kind of tried to do something like that already, if you’ll recall. Or how about the part about campaigning for a specific party or candidate while on the job? What will prevent the administration from making it a work requirement for every federal worker to vocally support one party in the midterms?
It’s going to be really important to see who, and how, those in the other branches of our government demand accountability for this flagrant violation of law.
Filed Under: congress, continuing resolution, doj, donald trump, government shutdown, hatch act, out of office, politicization


Comments on “Trump Administration Stomps All Over The Hatch Act With Shutdown Website Banners And Away Messages”
Trump spent his first term in office systematically violating the Hatch Act.
https://osc.gov/Documents/Hatch%20Act/Reports/Investigation%20of%20Political%20Activities%20by%20Senior%20Trump%20Administration%20Officials%20During%20the%202020%20Presidential%20Election.pdf
Did you seriously think he was going to follow it in his more unhinged second term?
And these OoO messages are just cherry on top on the cake, compared to Voight’s OMB systematically targeting federal money going to blue states, to be held up during the shutdown, and targerted RIF’s at “Democrat” Agencies.
Penalty
Since it wasn’t written here or on the linked Wikipedia page, here are [the penalties (5 U.S.C. § 7326)[https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/5/7326]:
So, if these actions could be tied directly to Trump’s orders, it would actually allow the removal of Trump and all complicit subordinates from office, with no option to serve again before about 2031. (And wouldn’t it just be bizarre if this were the thing to bring down the administration?) Alternately, someone could put an official reprimand in everyone’s file and take no other action.
Re:
The problem is that SCOTUS basically said Trump is immune for “official acts” and failed to qualify exactly what is an official act, and SCOTUS has already shown its majority is fine with shutting down limiting efforts in the courts with the stroke of a shadow docket pen.
My money on Trump leaving office early is either him dying from his circulation issues or Vance seeing an opportunity and pulling a 25th Amendment move, but only with the backing of other ambitious, greedy assholes to help him pull it off successfully.
Re: Re:
Given how the current administration has been promoting guns and violence, we also can’t rule out a crazy person causing an early end to this presidency. I’m not gonna suggest it or put money on it; it just seems like something that could happen. (Plus, the Secret Service was targeted by DOGE in April, though I’m not finding anything about whether layoffs actually happened.)
Re: Re:
Trump wouldn’t need to invoke Presidential Immunity,
The Hatch Act doesn’t apply to the President and Vice President.
Something Anon uo there should have found out when he looked up the text of the law.
Re: Re: Re:
Damn. You’re right: “(1) ‘employee’ means any individual, other than the President and the Vice President, employed or holding office …”
Still, anyone else who followed these illegal orders (presumably from the President) could be fired. Maybe. Some question remains about how much power the higher-ups (in the executive branch) have to decide the punishment.
Also, even though this act doesn’t apply to the President and VP per se, I feel like there ought to be some law against ordering subordinates to violate laws.
It’s spread across like 7 pages, which makes that annoying-to-difficult; a very “claustrophobic” web experience. Doubly so if one clicks “employee”, which results in a sub-page of the (already very short) “definitions” page, with only that one definition.
Personally, I think that “The Radical Right in Congress is incapable of restarting the government” is more accurate but hey, I’m not of theses greatest masterminds in the HUD.
Missing in the post....
Mention of the remedies and/or consequences availed in the Hatch Act. Is it like the DMCA with no teeth or are their actually punishments that won’t be held to account?
And the VA gets in on the action
This was in the email I received from the VA on Oct 1:
/quote
As you may be aware, funding for some government agencies, including portions of the Department of Veterans Affairs, expired at midnight this morning.
President Trump opposes a lapse in appropriations, and on September 19, the House of Representatives passed, with the Trump Administration’s support, a clean continuing resolution to fund the government through November 21. Unfortunately, Democrats are blocking this Continuing Resolution in the U.S. Senate due to unrelated policy demands.
During the current lapse in funding, the vast majority of VA benefits and services will continue uninterrupted, but the government shutdown is not without consequences to VA.
/end quote
It’s like this administration (regime) has yet to find a law that it can’t ignore.
Well either trump is dead or he is breaking the law again.
https://www.rawstory.com/trump-coin-2674153247/
So that's it for the Hatch Act, I guess
It’s a good and useful law, and I will hate to see the SCOTUS sweep it into the trash.
The Hatch Act WOULD be a beautiful piece of legislation if it had teeth. Unfortunately, it can only result in job impact (controlled ultimately by the political party in power) or a $1000 civil judgement. So it’s mildly useful if the actions of the employee are NOT aligned with the party in power. Otherwise, it seems (as we’ve seen for the last decade) little more than a phrase for pundits to throw around.
Re:
I couldn’t find much information on how the penalty is decided. Do you have a reference for it being controlled by The Party? “Job impact” would actually be great if imposed on Trump by a court. Like, “you’re fired and can’t hold a government office for the next 5 years” (thus being ineligible for any further Presidency before 2033, even if the term limit can be worked around).
Re: Re:
Here’s the penalties section of the code:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/5/7326
Basically, you can be fired or suspended or reprimanded. The problem with the Hatch Act (as I understand it, as I am not a lawyer) is that it is enforced by your reporting chain for your job. The vast majority of federal government reporting chains end in a political appointee.
In other words, I don’t think the courts are involved unless there’s a civil penalty, which can not exceed $1000.
...and the Forest Service follows
Take a look at this webpage:
https://www.fs.usda.gov/r09/gmfl/projects
The header reads:
The Radical Left Democrats shut down the government. This government website will be updated periodically during the funding lapse for mission critical functions. President Trump has made it clear he wants to keep the government open and support those who feed, fuel, and clothe the American people.
No political bias here!
Hopefully there is some interest this time around. One of the biggest disappointments of the Biden administration was their complete disinterest to grab these easy layups.
And no one will mention all the times the Republicans very much repeatedly shut down the government. Thanks, “news”.
While the Supreme Court sits on the sidelines cheering Trump on.
Hatch Act Penalties
Golly gee, guess they’ll hafta go be a lobbyist for a few years. And $1,000 – ooh, that hurts, really. Ouch.
It really is remarkable how lenient the penalty clauses are on ‘offenses committed under color of government’. Not surprising – just remarkable.
Howzabout the next one have “Shall be found guilty of a felony and imprisoned for no less than 25 years and no more than life, and fined 50% of their net worth or $50,000,000, adjusted for inflation from the day this is enacted, whichever is less.”
Oh, and like everyone else who can’t pay the fine, they get their wages garnished, assets seized, &c…
If you feel the need to force someone to say something...
On the one hand this is yet another blatant violation of the law and attempt to weaponize the government against the regime’s political opponents.
On the other hand it also shows their hand in that they felt they had to get people to blame the government because otherwise they weren’t going to do so, which really gives away the game.
The Trump administration can point fingers all they want, but ultimately they control the White House, both Houses of Congress AND the Supreme Court but are unable to pass a budget to keep the government running. This is failure on a very basic level, and they should follow the example of the French and RESIGN at once.