Congrats, People Of Montana: Your Governor Is About To Blow A Ton Of Taxpayer Money On An Unconstitutional TikTok Ban

from the culture-wars-are-the-opposite-of-leadership dept

“Constitutional originalists” and “fiscally conservative” Republican governors sure are having a moment these days throwing away millions upon millions of taxpayer dollars on totally unconstitutional laws that take away people’s 1st Amendment rights. It’s quite uncanny. Florida’s Ron DeSantis seems to be taking the lead here, where it seems like every other day or so he’s losing cases in court, and then turning around and passing even more ridiculously unconstitutional bills.

I recognize that Greg Abbott in Texas is trying desperately to keep up with DeSantis, but that doesn’t mean other hypocritical governors can’t play along as well. Enter Montana governor Greg Gianforte, a former tech exec, who’s probably most famous for throwing a journalist to the ground after disliking the journalist’s questions. The people of Montana still elected him after that, first to Congress and then as governor, suggesting they actually like electing people who stomp on free speech rights.

But now it’s likely to cost them a ton of taxpayer money.

That’s because Gianforte has now signed into law the blatantly, ridiculously, hilariously, obviously unconstitutional ban on TikTok. The bill was literally called “Ban tik-tok in Montana.” Anyway, we wrote about all the ways in which it was unconstitutional last month. And, originally, Gianforte sent it back to the Montana legislature with demands that they change it in a manner that would have (inadvertently, I think?) banned all social media for people in Montana.

Of course, even with his request back to the legislature, Gianforte demonstrated his supreme incompetence, as the “amendatory veto” was apparently sent back to the legislature too late for them to actually do anything about it.

So, instead, he just went ahead this week and signed the blatantly unconstitutional bill into law. The law (in theory) would go into effect in January of next year, and fine TikTok for existing in the state, as well as Google and Apple if they let people in Montana download the app to their phones.

In signing it he laughably claimed that he’s “protecting Montanans’ personal and private data from the Chinese Communist Party.”

Gianforte Tweet: "To protect Montanans' personal and private data from the Chinese Communist PArty, I have banned TikTok in Montana."

Except, of course, he’s done no such thing. He’s trampled on the 1st Amendment rights of Montanans and put their data at much greater risk. That’s because the law will require geographic tracking by TikTok, Apple, and Google to a much more significant degree than exists currently, just to figure out who is in Montana and who is not. So, by setting up this ban, he’s forcing these companies to collect more data than they otherwise would, putting that data at much greater risk.

On top of that, if China wants that data, they can just buy it from American data brokers, because we have basically nothing in place to stop them. Banning TikTok does literally nothing to help here, other than rile up some brainwashed boomers who think that China is spying on Americans through an app kids use to share dance moves.

The ACLU has already put out a statement calling out what a blatant violation of the public’s rights this law is.

“With this ban, Governor Gianforte and the Montana legislature have trampled on the free speech of hundreds of thousands of Montanans who use the app to express themselves, gather information, and run their small business in the name of anti-Chinese sentiment,” said Keegan Medrano, policy director at the ACLU of Montana. “We will never trade our First Amendment rights for cheap political points.”

This law stands basically no chance of surviving a run through the courts, and all it’s going to do is suck up a ton of Montanans’ taxpayer dollars, wasted on lawyers who are going to lose.

This isn’t protecting anyone’s privacy. It’s stomping on their rights, all so Gianforte can fight a fake culture war. It seems to be all the GOP has these days. Grievances, nonsense, and culture wars. How pathetic.

Filed Under: , , , ,
Companies: tiktok

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Congrats, People Of Montana: Your Governor Is About To Blow A Ton Of Taxpayer Money On An Unconstitutional TikTok Ban”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
21 Comments
Nimrod (profile) says:

Re:

They don’t really want another Civil War, they just want the return of slavery, child labor, and the repeal of all government regulations regarding pollution and fair labor practices, along with guns for everyone and no more abortions or drag shows. I say we let them take Texas and secede. They’ll come crawling back the moment the first big storm hits, which won’t take long at all…meanwhile we can watch and laugh as their fantasy crumbles into oily mud around their ankles…

nerdrage (profile) says:

Re: they better not say the state's name then!

Every person in Montana who dares utter the word “Montana” is going to be arrested then:

https://kids.nationalgeographic.com/geography/states/article/montana#:~:text=Montana%27s%20name%20comes%20from%20the,its%20nickname%2C%20the%20Treasure%20State.

“Montana’s name comes from the Spanish word montaña, roughly meaning “mountainous.””

You can’t make up this shit!

That One Guy (profile) says:

Bad looks for the ones doing it, worse looks for their intended audience

This isn’t protecting anyone’s privacy. It’s stomping on their rights, all so Gianforte can fight a fake culture war. It seems to be all the GOP has these days. Grievances, nonsense, and culture wars. How pathetic.

When playing to a crowd how you go about it is a huge tell about what kind of person you are and more importantly what kind of people you think your audience is.

That so many of the republican publicity stunts these days are various flavors of ‘Look at how much I loathe the first amendment’ really tells you a lot about what they believe will garner support and votes, and more damning the fact that they keep doing it is a pretty strong indicator that they’re correctly reading their audience.

T.L. (profile) says:

Re:

The funny part is one of the legal challenges to Trump’s attempted ban involved a suit filed by a group of TikTok creators; now, we wait for TikTok, whether in conjunction with NetChoice or with the trade group as a “friend of the court” (as NetChoice also opposes the law and represents TikTok as well as its competitors) to sue.

Interestingly, NetChoice tried to sway Gianforte into vetoing the bill entirely in a letter they sent that was full of the “what if the shoe was on the other foot” logic that they figured would keep a GOP governor from signing such a bill into law (including actually claiming that it would set a precedent for Dem-led states to ban social media sites used by conservatives — e.g. Twitter, Gab — for speech they don’t like). (The letter here: https://netchoice.org/netchoice-veto-request-of-montana-sb-419/) Clearly, it didn’t work, resulting in Montana’s government now having to waste taxpayer money to fight a lawsuit that even the Supreme Court would likely toss (given how the current members’ just ruled in favor of Big Tech on the two cases that had implications on Section 230, and the fact that all but two of the current justices were on the court when they struck down the state law behind the Packingham v. North Carolina case that this law goes against in that case’s general basis on how restricting people from accessing websites even under certain government-perceived compelling interests still violates their 1A rights).

The bill was basically created as an overreaction to the Chinese surveillance balloon incident in February, and if the courts (likely) strike it down, it will likely make any federal legislation targeting TikTok in any capacity (considering the Montana law is also based on claims lacking sufficient evidence, and is wrongly suggests that the state couldn’t have imposed less stringent regulations to mitigate the perceived risks without infringing on the 1A rights of residents and TikTok itself as well as other constitutional provisions and past Supreme Court precedent) essentially more difficult if not impossible to advance… God willing.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get all our posts in your inbox with the Techdirt Daily Newsletter!

We don’t spam. Read our privacy policy for more info.

Ctrl-Alt-Speech

A weekly news podcast from
Mike Masnick & Ben Whitelaw

Subscribe now to Ctrl-Alt-Speech »
Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Loading...