Trump’s Latest Solution To Everything: Let’s Make Foreign Bribery Great Again

from the that'll-fix-the-price-of-eggs dept

There have been legitimate debates about whether the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act — which makes it a criminal act for US entities to bribe foreign government officials — sometimes creates gray areas in international business. For example, over a decade ago, the Walmart Mexico case highlighted how Walmart payments to “speed up” permitting to build stores in Mexico blurred the line between standard expedited licensing and outright bribery.

But the law has been crucial in establishing clear standards for international business conduct. If nothing else, it made it so that American businesses could stand up to demands for bribes by pointing to the law, and saying they can’t because of the law.

Donald Trump, for whatever reason, has long been a critic of the law, though ironically, his own Justice Department in his first administration would go on to become its most aggressive enforcer.

This time around, when he seems to be trying to usurp Congress’ authority at every opportunity (and Congress is letting him do so), he has just instructed the Attorney General to ignore the law and let companies bribe foreign officials. Even leaving aside that the President is not supposed to instruct the Attorney General what laws to enforce, and which not to enforce, and that the Attorney General is supposed to be independent of the President, this seems bad.

It’s a move that perfectly encapsulates the Trump doctrine: when the law becomes inconvenient for your friends, just pretend it doesn’t exist.

“It sounds good, but it hurts the country,” Trump said of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, as he signed the order at the White House.

“Many, many deals are unable to be made because nobody wants to do business, because they don’t want to feel like every time they pick up the phone, they’re going to jail,” Trump said, referring to U.S. anti-corruption efforts.

Of course, Trump’s complaints about FCPA enforcement creating a chilling effect on business are directly contradicted by his own administration’s record. Not only was Trump’s Justice Department by far the most aggressive enforcer of the FCPA in its history, but American companies somehow managed to continue doing international business throughout this period of heightened enforcement.

In comparison, the Biden admin seemed to barely use it at all.

If Trump is claiming that deals are unable to be made because “they don’t want to feel like every time they pick up the phone, they’re going to jail,” then surely he can point us to some US businesses that claim the FCPA chilled their ability to “pick up the phone.” Spoiler alert: he can’t, because that’s not how this works.

On top of that, now, Trump announcing this fucks over tons of American businesses who will now be shaken down for bribes, and can no longer point to the FCPA to protect them (even as the law remains on the books, because Trump doesn’t have the Congressional votes to remove it). The end result is terrible for American businesses who will now be threatened and pushed to bribe foreign officials in all sorts of situations.

But, hey, if you want to look through what kinds of poor, poor executives are being caught under this law, Stanford has a nice page that has all the details you could need — at least until the admin forces it down.

This isn’t about making American business more competitive or solving any real economic problems. It’s about creating a permission structure for a specific kind of corruption that benefits a specific class of people. And if you’re wondering how enabling international bribery will help address any of America’s actual challenges — from the price of eggs to healthcare access — well, that’s probably because you’re thinking about this all wrong. The point was never to solve those problems in the first place.

Filed Under: , , , ,

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Trump’s Latest Solution To Everything: Let’s Make Foreign Bribery Great Again”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
28 Comments

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

Notorious M.M.B says:

Trying to decide the law in other countries is bad, mmm'kay?

Trump is right. We shouldn’t be trying to decide what is the law in other countries. It’s illegal to bribe officials here. It’s illegal in many other countries, too, but the rules vary and we definitely shouldn’t be trying to decide what is legal in those countries.

It’s messy and leads to bad outcomes. It’s analogous Gibson guitar case, where ebony they were using India claimed was legal, but the DoJ claimed it was illegal under Indian law over India’s objections and charged them under the Lacey act. (There were also allegations of political bias, as apparently his competitors were big democratic donors under Obama, sound familiar?)

It’s just dumb and messy and makes no sense.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re:

That’s because the only thing Matty values is power for power’s sake. He wants to be a powerful bully, he wants to hurt vulnerable people, but he’s just a regular jackoff. So he gets to live vicariously through them doing it, and the collapse of Pax Americana is just the price he’s willing to pay to see toxicity and bullying “legitimized.”

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

Stephen T. Stone (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re:

…says the guy who lies regularly and whose best comeback when asked to back up his factless claims is basically “nuh-uh to your uh-huh”. When you have anything better to offer than preschool playground arguments and name-calling, let me know. Otherwise: You said you weren’t going to engage with me any more, so I guess that’s another lie you told. 🙃

This comment has been deemed insightful by the community.
Anonymous Coward says:

Re:

We shouldn’t be trying to decide what is the law in other countries.

We aren’t. We are setting a standard for ourselves and saying, “We don’t want our businesses to engage in corrupt behavior. Even if the other country is totally fine with it.”

Example: Company 1 and Company 2 are competitors, and they both want to expand to a foreign country that has no restriction on bribery. Company 1 has no problem putting a little extra in a few foreign politicians’ pockets, so they get to build right away. Company 2 believes that bribery is corruption, so they refuse, and their permits are delayed for 6 months.

Free market amirite?

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

This comment has been deemed insightful by the community.
Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re: Re:

Wow, excellent rebuttal. Right back at you.

Literally, we aren’t.

And I’ll go one better and explain why. Because it’s a US law affecting US businesses. If we can place sanctions on foreign entities (like Iran) and make it illegal for US entities to send money into that country generally, we can certainly make it illegal for US entities to send money into foreign countries for more specific reasons (like bribes).

None of that has anything to do with what the law is in other countries, nor does it create any law in other countries.

This comment has been deemed insightful by the community.
Anonymous Coward says:

It's not just businesses who are hurt by this

The end result is terrible for American businesses who will now be threatened and pushed to bribe foreign officials in all sorts of situations.

I’m on the board of a nonprofit that operates in most countries – except for the ones that are sanctioned, of course. Some of those countries have cultures where payoffs are considered normal and customary, and people in those countries have sometimes requested/demanded bribes in order to “make things work better” or “overcome obstacles”.

We’ve pointed out that under the FCPA we can’t do that. (We also can’t afford it. We have a limited budget and we try very hard to spend every penny doing what we’re supposed to be doing.)

And now we can’t make that claim. Which means that we’ll be shaken down for money AND which means that our donors — who have been kind and generous — will be less likely to fund us once they realize that some of their contributions are going into individual pockets elsewhere instead of our mission.

Also: we’re not alone. Everyone in our position has just been undercut.

This comment has been deemed insightful by the community.
That One Guy (profile) says:

'If I can't beat them it's impossible to get them to listen!'

Complaining that a law against bribery makes it impossible to do business is like complaining that laws against assault make it impossible to have interactions with other people, telling you far more about the person whining than the law in question.

Anonymous Coward says:

“Many, many deals are unable to be made because nobody wants to do business, because they don’t want to feel like every time they pick up the phone, they’re going to jail,” Trump said, referring to U.S. anti-corruption efforts.

Well yeah; that’s kind of the point. It puts guard rails on deals that may profit a particular business while at the same disproportionately harming those who aren’t rich and powerful — both directly, and by normalizing bribery as an acceptable practice.

This comment has been deemed insightful by the community.
That One Guy (profile) says:

Re:

I’m reminded of the excuse the US Supreme Court used when they declared that (republican) presidents are above the law, ‘If the president has to worry about being charged for crimes that might limit what they are willing to do’.

Indeed it might, that’s the point, to put penalties in place to encourage people not to do certain things.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get all our posts in your inbox with the Techdirt Daily Newsletter!

We don’t spam. Read our privacy policy for more info.

Ctrl-Alt-Speech

A weekly news podcast from
Mike Masnick & Ben Whitelaw

Subscribe now to Ctrl-Alt-Speech »
Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Loading...