Lies, Panic, And Politics: The Targeted Takedown Of Backpage
from the weaponization-of-government dept
The case against Backpage was built on lies, innuendo, and a willful misunderstanding of how the internet works. But that didn’t stop the government from destroying the company and its founders’ lives.
Over the last few years, we’ve written about how the entire case against Backpage was a travesty of justice. The company actually worked closely with the feds (and even received commendations) to stop any actual human trafficking on their platform, but refused to help the feds go after consenting adult sex work. After that happened, a bunch of government actors turned on the company and falsely painted it as knowingly helping sex trafficking.
A number of different criminal and civil cases were brought against the company and its owners, one of whom, Jim Larkin, died by suicide last year. Over and over again, politicians and the media painted Backpage as being a truly evil player in the space. However, the more you looked at the details, the more it seemed like they were convenient political scapegoats in a war against a free internet.
So much of our own coverage was building on the incredible work of Reason’s Elizabeth Nolan Brown. She recently completed a new 45-minute documentary about the railroading of Backpage and its founders, which you can watch on YouTube:
There’s also a big article that discusses much of what’s in the video as well (at the link above) which is also worth reading. Here’s just a snippet:
In 2004, Lacey and Larkin launched the website Backpage as an extension of the classified ads that had always run in the back of their newspapers (and most other newspapers). Backpage.com had all the sections you would find in its print counterparts, including apartments for rent, job openings, and personals and adult services ads, separated by city.
At first, nobody paid much attention to the site. When attorneys general declared war on adult services ads online in the late 2000s, the similar but better-known Craigslist was the platform in their crosshairs.
Though newspapers had for decades published ads for escorts, phone sex lines, and other forms of legal sex work, Craigslist’s online facilitation of these ads coincided with two burgeoning moral panics. The first concerned the rise of user-generated content—platforms such as Craigslist and early social media entities that allowed speech to be published without traditional gatekeepers.
The second panic: sex trafficking. A coalition of Christian activists and radical feminists had been teaming up to push the idea that levels of forced and underage prostitution were suddenly reaching epidemic proportions. To support this narrative, they tended to conflate all prostitution or even any sort of sex work with coerced sex trafficking.
I do appear a bit in the documentary, though most of it focuses (more importantly) on founder Michael Lacey and all he’s been through.
The whole video is worth watching. It shows how an entire government apparatus can be turned around to try to burn down a media operation based on misleading claims of “sex trafficking,” leaving people and a business completely ruined just on the bases of innuendo and rumors.
Learning from what happened to Backpage is that much more important, especially as we’re now entering a new era of attacks on free expression.
Filed Under: 1st amendment, free speech, jim larkin, michael lacey, online speech, overreaction, sex work
Companies: backpage, backpage.com


Comments on “Lies, Panic, And Politics: The Targeted Takedown Of Backpage”
Good old Kamala was one of the AG’s involved in the Backpage saga. It was one of the things that made her difficult to vote for.
Re:
hmmmm, tough choice – between a possibly over zealous prosecutor and a self proclaimed dictator wannabe responsible in part for the deaths of hundreds of thousands in this country alone.
Yeah, I see your struggles.
Re: Re:
It really is eye-opening, isn’t it?
Re: Re:
“responsible in part for the deaths of hundreds of thousands in this country alone”.
uh, source?
Re: Re: Re:
Your eyes.
Re: Re: Re:
Considering you’re capable of posting comments, you were likely alive during the pandemic. If you don’t know what happened way back then in the olden days, web searches are a wonderful source of information.
Re: Re: Re:
Here’s a whole research paper proving it.
Re:
If that’s why you didn’t vote for her then I’d like to open up your brain and see how your priorities are ordered.
Re: Re:
Opening up their brain would do you no good at all. You need root access and a good port.
Re: Re:
I never said I didn’t vote for her.
Re: Re: Re:
Some people are incapable of nuanced thinking whatsoever.
What a (not) wonderful time to be alive we’re in.
I don’t even have any worries or panic thoughts to vent on this topic today, I’m just tired.
It’s funny how every single time the government and law enforcement insist that a new law or system is needed to apprehend criminals, they don’t even bother waiting for the new thing to happen and just… do it anyway, but still demand that the new law be put in place.
I’ve heard major thought leaders describe a new “right to disconnect from work” law as “infantilizing” to workers. But you’ll never hear such terms used on the ruling powers that be. Those elites have to be not only insulated from inconveniences of the subordinates they rule over, but also the consequences of their own decisions.
Well I just learned about HR 9495, which is a house bill that could be used to kill any NGO Trump doesn’t like by revoking their tax-exempt status.
According to govtrack it has a 30% chance of passing, and it’d still have to get through the senate. But it is being voted on at 10 PM today.
I don’t know if it’ll pass or if it can be challenged in court, but, it’s worth bringing attention to it.
Re:
..Nevermind? It just failed to pass the vote, apparently.
Good, I think!
Re: Re:
The legislators with rocks for brains aren’t all in Florida, more’s the pity. Fortunately, some of them can be trained.
Re: Re: Re:
I was worried there’d not be enough in the house to stop it, I’m glad I was proven wrong.
They may try to ram it through again at some point, but it’d likely end the same way.
Re: Re: Re:2
I needed this today.
Re: Re: Re:3
I love you too!
I’ve said this before, but I find it particularly galling to see Lacey and Larkin smeared as child traffickers when their paper’s reporting is the reason Warren Jeffs is behind bars.
Two parts...
There were misguided legal attacks, but also, it should be noted that Visa and MasterCard refused to do business with BackPage even when the business was completely legal.
Credit card companies should be like public utilities. They should not be able to deny processing to any legal business.
So much fun
All Social networks can Claim Personal Privacy RULES.
But that dont work well either, as they Grab the API and Monitor the Spit out of the sites, ANYWAY.
After WWII, the Gov. Changed lots, and DID lots. Some good and Much bad. When and ?W?Hy did we declare that we would police the WORLD for everyone else..
Re: There
There seems to be at least 2 groups Running around trying to create/Force the Armageddon of the Bible to happen.
Then we have a bunch of Zealous groups that THINK religion is the answer to everything. Which has been Disproven so many times.
Even the Pope has taken a backseat to watch things happen.
Re: Re:
Odd. I mentioned this point earlier and the post got flagged.
Mind you it did seem a bit off topic in that case, but it is a subject that literally affects everything, IMO.
Neo-Christians – Trump’s Army – actually believe that life on earth is just a stop over for God to separate the Good Christians from the rest of us.
Death for a Christian living on Earth brings freedom from the fear of death, because the religion teaches that such death brings eternal life in heaven to those God deems Good Christians.
The rest of us go to hell and get tormented for eternity.
It is absolutely conceivable that the Christians want us all to die soon, so they can get their promised reward of eternal life in heaven.
To do this all they need to do is legislate against all projects that attempt to prevent such things as global warming, pollution, disease control, war, and anything that threatens/promises to prevent climate disasters.
Remember, they are “Believers”, meaning they fully accept this promised reward as their due and the only thing standing between them and their reward, is the rest of us.