Editor-In-Chief Of RT, Russia’s Main Propaganda Network, Says Many Of Its Presenters Are AI-Generated – If You Can Believe Her
from the what-is-truth dept
RT, formerly Russia Today, has appeared a few times here on Techdirt. As the long article about RT on Wikipedia explains, the TV channel has morphed from an attempt to create a state-supported international news network along the lines of the BBC or France 24, but one that offered a Russian perspective on the world, to something that is now regarded as little more than a mouthpiece for Kremlin propaganda (disclosure: I was interviewed by Russia Today a couple of times over a decade ago.).
Following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, RT is now banned in many Western nations, but still commands audiences in other countries and online. As a result, considerable resources are still expended on RT and on the programs it produces. It is also continuing to explore new ways to reach people, and perhaps to save money, judging by a story on the independent Russian media site Agentstvo. It reports on statements made by RT’s editor-in-chief, Margarita Simonyan (original in Russian, translation by DeepL):
A ‘significant proportion’ of RT’s TV presenters do not exist, they have been created by artificial intelligence, Margarita Simonyan, editor-in-chief of the state channel, told TVC [TV Centre, a channel owned by the city administration of Moscow]. According to the propagandist, the artificial presenters also run their own social networks.
‘We have a significant proportion of TV presenters who do not exist. They don’t exist, they are artificial completely. This person doesn’t exist, and never did. This face never existed, we generated the voice, everything else, the character,’ the RT chief said.
One of the non-existent presenters had invited people to subscribe to her Telegram channel, promising the first readers [of the Telegram channel] amnesty ‘when we come to power,’ Simonyan retold the joke of her ‘colleague.’
Of course, with the head of a propaganda channel, there is always the risk that such statements are just more propaganda designed to mislead. But using AI-generated presenters makes a lot of sense here. They will never go off script, as humans might; the script that they read can be tweaked endlessly without the presenter getting tired or bored; and the spoken words can even be translated into the other languages in which RT broadcasts, read out by the same presenter with different mouth movements, or by a completely different one. A later comment from Simonyan seems to confirm this is happening:
RT has given up on broadcast editors; now images are selected or created by AI, Simonyan noted. This makes the process much cheaper, she explained. AI is involved in the dubbing of a new film about the Great Patriotic War [Russia’s name for the Eastern Front in World War II], using it to re-translate Vladimir Putin’s words into other languages, Simonyan said.
Journalism, as the ‘dark one’ of professions, will eventually disappear, like the coachmen did, the propagandist believes.
Moving towards a completely virtual, AI-generated network, complete with AI presenters and editors, would raise huge questions if the plan were to present conventional news reporting or features, with the underlying aim of presenting facts and the truth (whatever that means). But as a network that is designed to broadcast Russian propaganda, those questions are irrelevant. All that matters for Simonyan and her ultimate boss, Vladimir Putin, is whether the propaganda works, and if it can be generated in larger volumes, and more cheaply. Unfortunately, as is evident from everyday experience online, AI-generated fakes and lies do indeed work remarkably well. What is less clear is if other broadcasters, especially state-funded ones, will be able to resist the pressure to start using more AI, at least for backroom editorial functions, but maybe even for presenters, in order to compete in this brave new (artificial) world.
Follow me @glynmoody on Bluesky and on Mastodon.
Filed Under: ai, editors, kremlin, margarita simonyan, propaganda, russia, ukraine, virtual presenters, vladimir putin, world war ii
Companies: rt




Comments on “Editor-In-Chief Of RT, Russia’s Main Propaganda Network, Says Many Of Its Presenters Are AI-Generated – If You Can Believe Her”
Unfortunately AI is prone to hallucinations, so they could very well go off script. But the assumption would be that any hallucination would only enhance the propaganda, so that might not be considered a problem.
Re:
I’m (painfully) well aware that the term “AI hallucination” has entered the lexicon, but it’s wrong and misleading. It implies cognitive ability gone wrong, and AIs have no cognitive ability. They’re just autocorrect on steroids.
That aside: if someone wanted to program AIs to spew propaganda, they could train them on…propaganda, and ONLY propaganda. If every input includes “We have always been at war with East Asia” (and you had better recognize that quote) and no input includes any other sentence beginning with “We have always been at war with”, then the language model will dutifully issue that completion every single time, i.e., the weight in the network will be 1.0.
This will work because unlike real journalism/news reporting, with nuance and varied styles and perspectives, propaganda says the same thing the same way every time. It’s thus far easier to build a stochastic parrot (see the paper by Bender et.al.) for propaganda than for ordinary news reporting.
Re: Re:
Welcome to language where it’s used wrong until the wrong usage becomes right and people look at you funny when you say “champing at the bit.”
The thing is, hallucination was used to describe how an LLM would conjure facts and purport to believe them to be true, so the usage was poetically true, though not literally. Then the word just reused to describe all untrue things any LLM spewed.
But everything is marketing and hyperbole. They’re not even AIs but we call them that because of marketing. So nitpicking the language is a bit useless because you’re not going to stop people from using such terminology. It even gets used ironically and intentionally wrong as a joke or reference and then others don’t get the reference and it becomes a sincere usage.
Re: Re:
But Oceania has always been at war with Eastasia, and before that, it was always at war with Eurasia. Unfortunately for propagandists, a savant memory remains unaffected by the Memory Hole.
Re:
That would be during script writing, not in performance.
Re:
I JUST attempted to get help, with a problem of Withings not writing to Health Connect for the past two weeks.
And their AI generated ‘help’ gave me directions on how to fix the connection to Google Fit. The wrong, and soon to be depreciated, API. Fucking FUCK.
I have not seen much of Russian news programs other than one called “The Naked Truth”. I found their reporting style to be both informative and stimulating. I have no idea about anything being fake, could be but IDK ..
Re:
You’d have to be a real ass to think any of those boobs are telling you the truth. Get your head out of the bush, y’fool.
…nipples.
Are we certain she isn’t AI?
Re:
She has been around for decades. There could be an AI version of her but she is definitely real. She and Vladimir Solovyov are the leading Russian propagandists.
I think ai will be used to do summary’s or basic editorial work which can be checked by a human 1000s of people will lose their jobs as basic functions can be done by Ai as companys work out what can be done by Ai that is not visible to the public
Re:
I found the AI post!
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
RUSSIA RUSSIA RUSSIA!!!
Re:
Vladimir isn’t Beetlejuice bro.
Musk, Bezos, Murdoch would love this
There’s no competition in Moskovia, so there’s no concern about that. Instead, it’s clearly a case where the billionaires running legacy media would surely want to go full force with this.
Orwell beat them to it..
“Comrade Ogilvy, who had never existed in the present, now existed in the past, and when once the act of forgery was forgotten, he would exist just as authentically, and upon the same evidence, as Charlemagne or Julius Caesar.”
(1984, George Orwell)
Which begs the question...
How do we know this “editor in chief” isn’t AI-generated?
IF'
Governments were 1/2 as Honest as it demands of it’s citizenry.
Ranks Focus
Discover how Ranks Focus can help you improve your SEO, increase traffic, and grow your business with proven techniques and expert advice.
Ranks Focus
Blog
Business Services
Fashion
General
Health & Fitness
News