Documents Expose Yet Another Reputation Management Company Abusing Copyright Law To Bury Negative Content
from the using-this-one-simple-trick dept
For years, companies have been offering questionable services to downrank and bury information their customers don’t want surfacing during Google searches. And for years, these tactics have routinely involved abuse of copyright law, forged/faked court orders, and the filing of bogus lawsuits in hopes of securing default judgments from inattentive judges.
This is more of the same. Documents leaked to Forbidden Stories and shared with the Washington Post have uncovered the unsavory tactics (and even more unsavory customers) of Eliminalia, a Spain-based reputation management company with one hell of an origin story. This is from the Washington Post’s extensive report on the leaked documents, which details how Eliminalia founder Diego “Didac” Sanchez came to believe this company must exist:
When he was 12, he accused a local businessman of molesting him multiple times. The man was convicted of sexual abuse in a highly publicized trial and was imprisoned in 2007.
Years later, as a teenager, Sánchez publicly recanted his story, saying he had made it up. A panel of judges declined to overturn the conviction, however, citing additional evidence in the case, court records show.
Sánchez got news accounts of the abuse allegations removed from the internet, he wrote in the autobiography. He did not say how he did it, or what specifically was removed, but he wrote that he recognized a business opportunity.
Nothing in the documents suggests Sanchez decided to go into an extortion-like business by drumming up nasty allegations and making victims pay to have them removed from the internet. But that set of paragraphs sure seems to suggest it might have been a viable option.
Eliminalia does not seem to engage in any overt criminal activities. Instead, it appears to engage in a bunch of dishonest tactics. These tactics include creating fake sites to host (and backdate) copied content so the original could be targeted with bogus copyright claims. Here’s how this tactic works, as described in the Forbidden Stories article, which details interactions between a targeted publisher of critical journalism (Mexican reporter Daniel Sanchez) and the bogus persona concocted by Eliminalia (Humberto Herrera Rincon Gallardo) to get the content removed.
In January 2020, Gallardo filed a claim with Digital Ocean, Pagina 66’s US-based hosting provider, alleging that Sánchez had copied his content illegally. As proof, Gallardo linked to a third-party site that had published a replica of Sánchez’s piece, but with a falsified earlier publish date and fake author: Humberto Herrera Rincón Gallardo.
This time, the strategy worked. Digital Ocean ordered Sánchez to remove his article from Página 66’s site, or it would go black.
That was the tactic Eliminalia chose to go with after impersonating the EU Commission with a bogus takedown letter claiming GDPR violations: committing apparent perjury by faking up a copyright complaint.
Eliminalia also creates bogus news sites by the dozens, flooding the internet with low-value posts supposedly written by people who want worse content written about them buried.
Researchers from Qurium linked the 600 fake news websites to Eliminalia’s parent company, Maidan Holding, according to Tord Lundstrom, Qurium’s technical director. The websites’ IP addresses — each a string of numbers identifying where a site is hosted — are clustered together sequentially, Lundstrom said, and registration data from the websites’ hosting providers show that the IP addresses were assigned to Maidan.
The fake news sites contain real news copied from legitimate media organizations, and many have names that are similar to real outlets — the London New Times, CNNEWS Today and Le Monde France. But tucked amid those headlines are at least 3,800 articles that prominently feature the names of customers identified in the Eliminalia records…
So, the sort of stuff we’ve seen before, only on a much more massive and, apparently, lucrative scale. But given the company’s origins — a man trying to right a wrong he’d caused by wiping the internet of his false molestation accusation — Eliminalia seems more than willing to help far less altruistic people cover up evidence of their wrongdoing.
Its U.S. clients included a popular reality-TV personality publicly accused of sexual misconduct and a California biotech entrepreneur who had been convicted of financial fraud and is now fighting charges he hired a hit man to kill a business associate. The leader of a major religious charity in Chicago that faced criticism over its executives’ salaries also turned to Eliminalia, the records show.
Eliminalia did work for an Italian spyware company that had been fined for selling surveillance technology to Syria’s autocratic regime, and for a Swiss bank that had drawn public scrutiny over Venezuelan clients who were suspected of money laundering. It also worked on behalf of a well-known traveling circus clown who had been convicted of sexually assaulting a 14-year-old girl in Switzerland.
Here’s more, from Forbidden Stories’ reporting:
Forbidden Stories identified Eliminalia clients in 50 countries across five continents. The leak of around 1,500 current and former clients includes details of Eliminalia’s business dealings with a medical doctor who reportedly operated a torture center during Chile’s dictatorship and was found guilty of homicide; former bank officials at Banca Privada d’Andorra, accused of money laundering for corrupt Venezuelan officials; and a Brazilian businessman implicated in a global prostitution network, among others.
And now that this has been exposed by the documents and the great reporting at both of the above-mentioned sites, Eliminalia is attempting a disappearing act of its own. Reporters visiting its Barcelona office were informed it was now a company called “Idata Protection,” a (you guessed it) data protection service in no way affiliated with the work performed by the entity that owns it, Eliminalia. Its founder was also nowhere to be found.
Ugly tactics and even uglier customers. That’s not surprising. The entities that tend to seek out reputation management help are those that have destroyed theirs by being awful. For a little while, dodgy takedowns and black hat tactics actually get the job done. Sooner or later, though, it almost always seems to fall apart. But just as much as disintegration is inevitable, so is the rise of another company just as awful to take its place.
Filed Under: copyfraud, copyright, copyright abuse, diego sanchez, fake news, gdpr, reputation, reputation management, seo
Companies: eliminalia, maidan holding
Last chance! Support our fundraiser today and 



Comments on “Documents Expose Yet Another Reputation Management Company Abusing Copyright Law To Bury Negative Content”
Jhon Smith’s kind of people.
Re:
Someone has the presidential suite in this individual’s brain.
Re: Re:
When someone threatens you for five years you tend to remember them, for better or worse.
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
So this criminal conduct is possible, but lawyers engineering defamation lawsuits by paying hackers to target litigious individuals who repeat defamatory content while the search engines remain immune is just some conspiracy theory.
Without Section 230, inaccurate information about people wouldn’t exist in the first place. There’s no need to get rid of 230 anyway, just put the burden of proving third-party authorship on the alleged intermediary, with immunity lost if the original publisher cannot be identified. Also eliminate the single-publication rule.
Re:
…hallucinated nobody mentally competent, ever.
Why’d you stop signing your posts, Jhon? Don’t want to face responsibility for the lies you constantly spew about people?
Re: Re:
It’s almost like his claim that “Once the true identity of John Smith is revealed I get to retroactively make lawsuits against all the anonymous nobodies who doubted my genius and power” was complete horseshit or something.
Re:
And remove all anonymity from the Internet, as nobody with a functional lawyer would allow anyone to post without presenting some proof of identity. To do otherwise is to allow anonymous people to destroy the site by posting defamatory and illegal material.
Re:
If it wasn’t just “some conspiracy theory” you’d have been able to point to an actual case, instead of vaguely claiming that Russian hackers leaving automated spam comments on Yelp have ruined doctors in America.
You do remember the cases you listed from the 1970s and 1980s about apartment rentees getting harassed based on incorrect information, right? Cases that existed before Section 230? Holy FSM, it’s like you can’t even be arsed to keep your lies consistent.
If there wasn’t a need you wouldn’t be constantly bitching about it.
lol, you have plenty of opportunity to sue the original publisher like in the Milorad Truklja case. And yet, you don’t, because you think a “Fuck Google” gets you an automatic pass to do whatever you want while sending your spammy mailing lists.
How’s that Paul Hansmeier fund coming along bro? Didn’t you say that Prenda would appeal and they would win?
Re: Re:
The odds are that this has actually happened somewhere because there are some shitty people in the world.
But what stupid here is arguing is akin to make everything worse for everyone because someone somewhere did one shitty thing. There will always be edge-cases that has bad outcomes and you can’t have a functioning society if you implement rules that are supposed to make everyone safe from everything.
And one of the arguments stupid makes is that “Without Section 230, inaccurate information about people wouldn’t exist in the first place” is so divorced from reality one have to wonder what drugs he’s on. People misremember things or they didn’t catch the whole story or misunderstand the context so when they pass that story/information on it will have inaccuracies in it. It’s like the idiot have never heard of the Whisper/Telephone game.
Re: Re: Re:
The attempts at character assassination is not the problematic part of Jhon Smith’s consistent claims. The problematic part is the suggestion that anyone’s business was ruined based on provably false accusations by agents from another country, consumers were collectively dumb enough to take anonymous claims at sheer face value, and a judge ruled that no action could be taken and no subsequent press releases to correct the alleged reputational damage could be made.
The example(s) that Jhon Smith alleges happened implies two things: one, that the supposed strategy of third-party character assassination is extremely viable, and two, legal precedent exists. Neither scenario can be observed, and Jhon Smith has never made any serious attempt to cite his sources, beyond harassment cases that are dated before the widespread use of the Internet, or cases in countries that don’t have Section 230 (so the idea that removing Section 230 would nip the harassment problem in the bud is pretty moot). In the exact same way he’s been beating the drum of “Masnick is going to get publicly fucked, just you wait” for five years and counting.
Reputation management: There’s constant rumours that companies should listen the customers and fix any problems in their products after they have received the information what exactly is wrong with the product. This is some kind of feedback loop idea where there’s theory that popular works are higher quality simply because more people are shouting to the customer service and thus companies have no other choice than improve the quality of the product.
This feedback loop is the stupidest idea we’ve heard in a while. The theory that the quality for the product comes by loudly shouting to the customer service when the customer cannot figure out how to turn on the device with the power button. Basically that kind of information simply isn’t helpful with improving the quality of the product.
How real companies do it, is that they develop the solution beforehand and then copy that solution 100 million times. Once the solution is in customer’s hands, there’s nothing that can be done any longer — changing all 100 million devices isn’t simply possible. The feedback loop theory assumes that the product development happens after the product is shipped to the customer.
While software updates have slightly changed the equation, main work is still being done beforehand and not afterwards like the feedback theory assumes.
Reputation management companies are needed when customers simply fail to understand that the feedback loop theory is not in use.
Re:
Sounds like you’re interested in hiring a reputation management scam team, Tero.
Thanks for sharing such an informative and Fantastic post,I bookmarked this page and will get through all your posts.Keep sharing such nice posts