Copyright Has Kept De La Soul’s Classic 1st Album Off Streaming… Until Now
from the finally dept
For years, we’ve written about the copyright nonsense around sampling in hip hop music, and how it was treated with very, very different rules than things like cover songs and paying homage to previous artists in other forms of music. As we’ve mentioned for over a decade, filmmaker Kembrew McCleod did a full (fascinating) exploration of this in the documentary “Copyright Criminals” which is worth watching if you can find it. The trailer is here:
The group De La Soul features prominently in the movie, as their first album, 3 Feet High and Rising, has long been the quintessential example of an album that had so many samples that it would be effectively impossible to get the official licenses necessary to release it today.
Because of this, that classic hip hop album has not been available on various streaming platforms in an era where (unfortunately or not) not being on streaming more or less means the album doesn’t exist. It’s obviously been frustrating for the band. In 2014, they made everything they had ever created free for people to download from their website… but just for 24 hours. In fact, back in 2015, De La Soul did a Kickstarter project to create new music for themselves to sample as a commentary on their inability to sample others (I could have sworn I wrote about the project back then, but search is failing me in finding it). Both of these moves came with statements from the group talking about how much they want their music out there and how much they want to support their fans, but copyright law and the record labels kept getting in the way.
All of this is silly, frankly. Much of the time, samples are unrecognizable from the original. They should, easily, be covered by de minimis use or fair use. Yet, perhaps because of the nature of the music — and who frequently creates it — courts were much quicker to insist that every single sample needs to be licensed, no matter how short, no matter how transformed, no matter how unrecognizable, and even no matter how much a sample might actually help promote the original.
Still, for over a decade, people have talked about finally trying to make 3 Feet High and Rising available legally (of course, if you just ignore copyright laws, it’s always been possible to find it). Three years ago there were reports that it was finally going to come to streaming. Except that ran into problems as the plan from Tommy Boy records was apparently done without agreement with the group, and where most of the money would go to the label.
In 2021, Tommy Boy was sold to Reservoir for $100 million, and then it appears that Reservoir cut a deal with De La Soul to allow the group to acquire the rights to their own masters.
And, finally, that brings us around to the present, where De La Soul, owning its own masters, is going to put them on various streaming services (and reissue some of the albums as well).
It’s good that De La Soul controls their own masters and is able to get this music out there for more people to listen to legally, but it’s somewhat ridiculous that it’s taken all this time and had to go through so much nonsense. Of course, it’s still not entirely clear to me that the rights issues regarding the samples are all cleared. I recall a similar effort by the Beastie Boys to rerelease Paul’s Boutique that resulted in a lawsuit over some of the samples as well.
But hopefully, we can get past all that… and just let people enjoy the music.
Filed Under: copyright, de la soul, masters, music, sampling, streaming


Comments on “Copyright Has Kept De La Soul’s Classic 1st Album Off Streaming… Until Now”
An example of thatI came across while going down a Youtube rabbit hole:
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=j4sx0VFbwHU
Copyright.the idea where people overvalue their contribution to culture when others are influenced by what they did, while totally ignoring the value of everything that inspired them.,
Not sure if you can keep this up (what with copyright and stuff like that yunno) but here’s a functioning torrent for the movie
https://yts.mx/movies/copyright-criminals-2009
Re:
gasp!
The website for the movie has links to purchase copies, I found a full copy on vimeo of dubious parentage, I found a full copy on youtube from what appeared to be a production company but only 1 video…
Is that like chatGPT slurping up all the git data and from elsewhere and selling it back to the kids of the individuals who contributed all of that code/information?
History is gonna laugh at the parrotsites/parasites on the internet with no talent. I think they already did that with the inferior emotions and obsolete feelings in media.
Re:
Digital parasite does explain that dataset
Re:
“History is gonna laugh at the parrotsites/parasites on the internet with no talent”
Already happens to some degree. The guys who sampled one thing and rapped over it are less revered than the ones who created something from various sources.
Sounds very familiar to me. I’m of the age where I grew up during the late 80s hip hop explosion, the massive popularity of the UK rave scene, etc. All of which had massive creativity due to sampling. I can genuinely say that some songs got more attention through sampling than they would otherwise. I literally introduced someone to an artist due to a sample on New Year’s Eve, for what it’s worth (Ce Ce Rogers’ Someday, which was sampled with Liquid’s Sweet Harmony, the guy I was talking to didn’t realise it was a sample till I told him).
I can understand why the artists might be annoyed, but there’s so much creativity that introduces people to the sources, I doubt that it’s a negative overall. The only issue is when the “sampling” means “copy everything then rap on top without a change”, which I can guarantee De La Soul and their contemporaries did not do.
Re:
Paul, you mispelled ‘realise’
Creativity is a blank canvas.
https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/artificial-intelligence-art-wins-colorado-state-fair-180980703/
All those samples are not blank canvases.
Re:
Sounds like a very narrow mindset.
Re:
This isn’t just narrow minded, it’s completely ignorant of reality.
Creativity has NEVER BEEN a blank canvas. Creativity always builds on what has come before. There are literally tons of articles on Techdirt that have explored that to different degrees but the honest truth is that believing it’s a blank canvas is just selfishly and intentionally ignorant of reality.
This is the reason all new things conflict with Copyright and end up running through the gauntlet of lawsuits and accusations of Copyright infringement. People are too busy wanting to believe a fantasy to care to understand the nature of creativity.
It’s free and legal
It’s legally free in a dozen plus sites. Including Tubi!
Thanks for sharing such an informative and Fantastic post,I bookmarked this page and will get through all your posts.Keep sharing such nice posts
Nice post by the way. I loved the article very much. It was so informative and interesting