Comcast Forces Users To Buy Comcast Hardware If They Want Faster Upload Speeds
from the do-not-pass-go,-do-not-collect-$200 dept
For decades, consumers have mostly wanted one thing from their ISP: a semi-affordable dumb pipe connection for the Internet. For just as long, US ISPs have bucked this demand, routinely trying to saddle users with higher costs and additional services consumer never asked for, while finding strange new ways to make an additional buck on the back of what are usually captive customers.
Take Comcast, for example. The company is preparing to roll out long awaited faster upload broadband speeds for its subscribers. But in order to actually subscribe to these new speeds, they’re forcing Comcast customers to use Comcast hardware they may not want. Hardware that’s basically a glorified home data monitoring subscription service costing an extra $14 to $25 a month.
When asked about the dumb decision by Ars Technica, Comcast pretends that there’s some kind of unforeseen technical challenge that’s preventing them from providing faster speeds to users who own their own hardware any sooner than “later next year”:
“We intend to extend the experience to customer-owned modems later next year and are working through the technical requirements as we learn,” Comcast said. “We started offering it with our own equipment first and now are working through how to extend to customer-owned equipment.”
Comcast also said that giving the upload boost to xFi Complete customers first follows its “typical validate, test, and certification process for a new network innovation.” But if the reasons for limiting the upload boost to Comcast hardware initially are purely technical instead of revenue-based, it’s not clear why people who rent the gateway for $14 a month shouldn’t get the same benefit.
Keep in mind, Comcast already forces users to use this hardware if they want to avoid Comcast’s arbitrary usage caps and overage fees, which are another, different, pointless cash grab. And this hardware restriction will likely be expanded to the company’s “full duplex” upgrades next year that aim to finally provide cable users with fully symmetrical upload/download speeds.
As Comcast continues to lose video subscribers to streaming customers, they’ll increasingly be looking for creative ways to nickel-and-dime their captive broadband subscriber base to provide Wall Street those sweet, improved quarterly returns. Forcing you to use overpriced hardware you don’t want is just one of many.
But an estimated 83 million Americans live under a broadband monopoly, so they have no alternative ISP to flee to when their own provider engages in this kind of behavior. That’s where we are as a country where regulators generally couldn’t give any less of a shit about consumers being ripped off and policy leaders pay endless lip service to the importance of innovation and competition but do nothing to foster it.
Filed Under: broadband, cable, caps, competition, digital divide, fcc, high speed internet, speeds
Companies: comcast


Comments on “Comcast Forces Users To Buy Comcast Hardware If They Want Faster Upload Speeds”
ISPs should focus on interoperability specifications and not on specific hardware.
Re:
Oh they do, they just pretend otherwise when it enables them to get more money.The equipment they use is standard, even when they get it badged with their name.
Yay, another way for Comcast to screw –
Oh, wait… it looks like another company is deploying fiber in my town.
It’ll be nice to completely say bye-bye to Comcast (already ditched cable tv years ago).
I jumped ship to TMobile Home Internet for $50 a month at the first opportunity and I couldn’t be happier. Speeds are not as consistent, but they typically far surpass what I was getting from Comcast for $100+ a month. The viability of 5G internet is going to depend very strongly on local tower coverage though.
Re:
And how many of your neighbors are using the tower.
Re: Re:
DOCSIS subscribers can also be strongly affected by the traffic of other subscribers; and passive optical networks are affected in theory, but in practice are so fast we don’t see big problems. Do we know which of these categories 5G falls into?
Re: Re: Re:
%g usually hangs on the end of a fiber. But its limit is the bandwidth allocated to the tower. In theory, fiber to the home gives more bandwidth than that allocated to all users of a tower. Cellular band width is increased by replacing a tower with more lower power towers. At some point you may as well run fiber to the home, because you are putting in one or more towers per home.
Re:
In the UK, that amount of money will get you 3Gbps from certain ISPs (assuming the infrastructure is there, also note that Openreach only goes up to 1Gbps, so this infrastructure is ISP specific)
WTF America? 100 a month for service worse than 5g? (I have 5g because otherwise its really crap ADSL, even by ADSL standards and it is more expensive, but still wholly reasonable especially for the speed gain, and surprisingly, latency improvements as well because TalkTalk was the previous ISP). Overall, 5g costs 30 a month, a crap isps ADSL (TalkTalk) is around 20 a month (although it is the same ADSL as basically anyone else) and a good isps ADSL (BT) is around 40 a month.
(all prices include hardware, its cheap to buy your own for ADSL but purchasing your own falls in the £300+ range for 5g)
Re:
I did the same, but with Verizon. I replaced my DSL and TV service from the phone company with VZ 5G and YouTube TV, and save $100/month.
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
TVS Eurogrip | Best Tyre Manufacturers in India | Tyres for Indian Roads
TVS Eurogrip is one of the best manufacturers in India and exporters of Two-Wheeler tyres, Three-Wheeler & Ultra Light Truck tyres, Agricultural Tyres, Industrial Tyres and OTR Tyres
Visit our website: https://tvseurogrip.com/
That’s capitalist dictatorship for you. You have no choice but to contribute to inflated corporate profits if you want to just live your life.
“a new network innovation”
Yes changing a 5 to a 10 in a settings file is really innovative.
Re:
But if you let people change 5 into 10 on their own, where will it stop? Next they’ll want to change 7 into 14, or even 11 into 22! Won’t someone think of the children?
coning cunts! costs absolutely nothing to do this yet, typically of USA industries etc, gotta screw the customers for no reason! and, just as typical, the politicians sit around, thumbs up bums and just let it happen! fucking disgraceful!!
Google Fiber is currently building out in my city, I’ll be glad when it reaches my neighborhood and I can tell Comcast to kick rocks.
Maybe a few class action lawsuits will humble Concash. I know we’re over litigious here in the US, but what can you do? Multiple municipal ISPs?