Everyone’s Got Terrible Regulations For Internet Companies: Senator Bennet Wants A ‘Digital Platform Commission’

from the bad-politicians,-bad dept

Everyone these days seems to want to regulate social media. I mean, the reality is that social media is such a powerful tool for expression that everyone wants to regulate that expression. Sure, they can couch it in whatever fancy justifications they want, but at the end of the day, they’re still trying to regulate speech. And this is across the political spectrum. While, generally speaking, the Republican proposals are more unhinged, it’s not like the Democratic proposals are actually any more reasonable or constitutional.

The latest on the Democratic side to throw his hat in the ring is Colorado Senator Michael Bennet, who has a bizarre proposal for a new Digital Platform Commission. He compares it to the FDA, the FCC, and the more recent Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB). Except, this is different. Regulating social media means regulating speech. So the FDA and the CFPB examples are not relevant. The only one that actually involved regulating businesses engaged in the transmission of expression is the FCC, and that’s part of the reason why the FCC’s mandate has always been quite narrow, covering specific areas where there government can get involved: e.g., in regulating scarce spectrum.

Defenders of the law claim that it’s not there to regulate speech, but so much of what the bill tiptoes around is that Bennet is unhappy with what is clearly 1st Amendment protected activity by these websites. The bill kicks off by arguing that these websites have disseminated disinformation and hate speech — both of which are protected speech. It complains about them “abetting the collapse of trusted local journalism” which is a weird way to say “local journalism outfits failed to adapt.” It blames the websites for “radicalizing individuals to violence.” But you could just as easily say that about Fox News or OAN, but hopefully most people recognize how promulgating regulations in response to those organizations would be a serious 1st Amendment problem. It trots out a line claiming that social media has “enabled addiction” which is a claim that is often made, but without any real support or evidence.

It’s basically one big moral panic.

Anyway, what would this new Commission regulate? Well, a lot of stuff that touches on speech, even as it tries to pretend otherwise. Among other things, this Commission would be asked to issue rules on:

requirements for recommendation systems and other algorithmic processes of systemically important digital platforms to ensure that the algorithmic processes are fair, transparent, and without harmful, abusive, anticompetitive, or deceptive bias;

So, recommendations are opinions, and opinions are speech. That’s regulating speech. Also, given what we’ve seen with things like Texas’ social media law, which uses similar language, it’s not at all difficult to predict how a commission like this under a future Trump administration would push rules about “deceptive bias.”

I am perplexed at how a Democratic Senator could possibly write a law like this and not consider how a Trump administration would abuse it.

There’s a lot more in the bill, including other ideas that wouldn’t directly impact speech, but the whole thing is ridiculous. It’s setting up an entire new regulatory agency over social media. We know what happens in situations like this. You get regulatory capture (witness how often the FCC is controlled by telecom interests leading to a lack of competition).

You also get a death of innovation. Regulated industries are slow, lumbering, wasteful entities where it’s difficult, if not impossible, to generate new startups and competition. Effectively this bill would hand over most internet innovation to foreign companies.

It’s a ridiculously dangerous move.

I am perplexed. The last few years we’ve seen non-stop unhinged moral panic from both parties about the internet. As we noted last year, both parties are playing into this, because both parties are trying to twist the internet to their own interests. That’s not what the internet is for. The internet is supposed to be an open network for the public. Not managed by captured bureaucrats.

Filed Under: , , , , , , ,

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Everyone’s Got Terrible Regulations For Internet Companies: Senator Bennet Wants A ‘Digital Platform Commission’”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
nerdrage (profile) says:

youre the product

On social media, the user is not the customer. The user is the product, to be sold to the customer: advertisers. Advertisers want lots and lots of page views for their ads, and that’s achieved by whipping people up into an insane frenzy with controversy and flat-out fake news.

Maybe Congress should go direct to the source of the problem, the advertisers? They have reputations to maintain and are skittish about regulation.

But pounding on social media for doing exactly what it’s designed to do is pointless. If people are annoyed at the toxicity of social media, do what I do: leave. Don’t generate page views, don’t generate ad revenue, the whole nasty system collapses. If you use social media, you are agreeing to support a toxic system. Period.

ECA (profile) says:

to much change

Scares them.
“everyone wants to regulate that expression.”

Can we say that SOME would wish to HIDE from the truth? And allot of this seems to TRY to Aim at someone with Money, not the person who may have MADE a comment. It would be to easy to Bomb a site with STUPID’, then disappear and then TRY to hold the Site liable for anything posted, cause they cant/wont/dont want to find the person who may the interjection.

Many of us persons from the older days, have come to find out that there was Allot of truth, from the past that got hidden, Smacked Down, beaten up, and we were LIED to. That its amazing that SOME people still think this is a Great nation, even when you look at basic numbers and find the only things we are in the lead on, is exporting food and Oil. then giving more money to BOTH of those involved doing it.

Its Kinda a strange fact, that in USA history, since its founding, there have only been 8 years of PEACE.

Anonymous Coward says:

theres a reason why google does not publish its process about youtube ,or how google search works ,this tranparency would just make it easy for spammers
to game the system to get to the top of search results. i supose its easier to attack big tech for ca than to provide resources like affordable childcare ,medical services that people can afford or reduce the cost of drugs ,medicine by encouraging more competition .
in the 50s, it was rock n roll, comicbooks , now its time to panic about big tech.

Lostinlodos (profile) says:

“But you could just as easily say that about Fox News or OAN”

Or MSNBC for that matter.

Kind of funny to talk about news and radicals when both OAN and MSNBC so often carry called to violence. Sometimes from elected officials.

“predict how a commission like this under a future Trump administration

Or to hide all the legal fallout about the criminal Clinton campaign.

Both parties are currently fighting to block any speech they dislike and force any propaganda they agree with.
We must depend on the courts to do their constitutional protectionist jobs.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...