Oatly Sues PureOaty For Trademark And Trade Dress Infringement

from the milking-it dept

Maybe it’s something about being in a beverage industry that makes people treat trademark law as though it were something it most definitely is not. For years, we’ve discussed the trademark problem that the exploding craft beer industry has faced. Oatly, the Swedish company that produces that well known non-dairy milk product, is most certainly not in the alcohol business, but they appear to be aping the most aggressive members of that unrelated industry in a recent lawsuit filed overseas against a very small competitor, which makes a product called PureOaty.

Oatly, the Swedish oat milk maker with a market value of $15bn, has taken legal action for trademark infringement against a Cambridgeshire-based family farm over its PureOaty drink. The Malmo-based group accuses Glebe Farm Foods, which specialises in gluten-free oats, of infringing trademarks including the Oatly brand name and pack design, and of “passing off” the beverage as Oatly, according to documents submitted to the court.

Now, most of Glebe Farm Foods’ business has nothing to do with selling oat-based milk substitutes. Instead, the company makes most of its money selling gluten-free oat-stuffs to food producers. But it does sell PureOaty as a side product, rebranded under its current name in early 2020. Notably, the oat-based milk industry is expanding quickly, with plenty of startups getting into the business. In other words, this very much looks like an early-stage version of the craft beer industry.

With that in mind:

Lawyers for Oatly and its UK business claim that when Glebe Farm rebranded its Oat Drink product as PureOaty in 2020, “Glebe Farm’s intention was to bring Oatly’s products to mind and thereby to benefit from the huge power of attraction and reputation of Oatly’s branding”.

Oatly’s lawyers claim that the name PureOaty calls to mind Oatly, while the product’s blue packaging and image of a teacup also recall the Swedish brand.

Okay, let’s take these two claims, the basis for the lawsuit, in order. The claim that PureOaty calls to mind Oatly is odd. Sure, both brand names include the word “oat”, but that’s descriptive of what the milk product is made of. The “Pure” is, frankly, doing a lot of work in differentiating the two brands. All that’s really left is the “y” at the end of each brand name and if that’s where the confusion claim rests, well, that isn’t very convincing at all.

As for the argument that the trade dress is going to be confusing, well:

If those two products confuse you, you need help. The color scheme is different, as is the placement of the branding and all the verbiage on the packaging. The only real commonality is, as Oatly called out, the inclusion of a tea or coffee cup. And the fact is that both of these products are used as creamers. Including a tea or coffee cup isn’t particularly distinctive for these oat-milk products.

But, as is always the case when it comes to trademark bullying, this is likely happening at least in part because Glebe Farm Foods is tiny compared with Oatly. That’s why trademark bullying works. Whether it does in this case I suppose will come down to how hard and long Glebe Farm Foods wants to fight back.

Filed Under: , , ,
Companies: glebe farm foods, oatly

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Oatly Sues PureOaty For Trademark And Trade Dress Infringement”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
This comment has been deemed insightful by the community.
Anonymous Coward says:

I’d never heard of Oatly before today.

Now I know what an utterly shitty piece of crap their marketing is, I suspect they may also be lacking in the hygiene, taste and environmental areas too.

With that in Mind, I’ve made sure my employer doesn’t stock or use Oatly brand products anywhere at all.

This comment has been deemed insightful by the community.
Federico (profile) says:

Re: Usage of term milk

Can we also address the false advertising inherent in calling a mixture of water, grain, and sugar "milk" when it doesn’t come from a mammal.

They don’t (in EU), after a barrage of lawsuits from the dairy industry, recently copied by the animal-based meat industry.

The cartons are emblazoned with slogans such as “No milk. No soy. No badness.”


Funnily, trademark protection was deployed to defend some of the slogans the dairy industry doesn’t like.

BJC (profile) says:

Re: Re:

Without reading the complaint (why haven’t you linked it, TechDirt? Don’t you guys complain about that all the time?) my guess is that it’s sort of a lateral argument.

Oatly isn’t blue-colored, but a lot of Swedish brands are (see, e.g., logos for Ikea, Skanska, or SAAB) because blue is one of the two colors of the Swedish flag.

So the argument is, if someone’s saying, "hey, I want the Swedish oat drink with the ‘oat + y’ name," they might pick Oaty instead of Oatly, being confused because lots of Swedish things are blue.

I can’t comment about the merits of it because I don’t know UK/EU trademark law, which for all I know has different standards for confusion than American law.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published.

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...