Boris Johnson's Phone Number Leaks: Turns Out He Uses End-To-End Encryption… While Trying To Ban It For Everyone Else

from the good-for-the-goose,-but-fuck-you dept

Well, look at that. The gossip newsletter Popbitch revealed UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson’s personal phone number (in a somewhat hilarious way). The latest edition included this up at the top:

0ver the last few weeks, Boris Johnson has taken a lot of flak for refusing to change his personal mobile number. Critics say it?s highly irresponsible that any 7om, Dick or Harry could just freely add the PM on WhatsApp and strike up a chat.

8ut then the examples they give in those stories are always extremely wealthy or powerful people. Of course Sir James Dyson moves in circles where the 3M?s number is common knowledge. Obviously Mohammed bin Salman is going to have swapped digits.

It?s not as though the Prime Minister?s personal phone number could just be floating out there on the internet, is it? It would be absolutely insane if it was tacked on to the bottom of an old press release that he dished out freely while MP for Henley, and Shadow Minister for Higher Education.

A press releases which ? feasibly ? could still exist online. And which any old email newsletter could start p1ssing about with?

You might notice what appear to be typos there, where letters are turned into numbers. Well, there are a few more in the article as well, and… it turns out they are his phone number, which apparently has been easily available on the internet for 15 years, since it was once included in a press release that was sent out when Johnson was an opposition MP. And, as Popbitch noted, he’s apparently chosen not to change it.

That, alone, is not really that interesting for a Techdirt audience — though it does raise at least some concerns about his security practices on that particular phone. But what’s much, much more interesting is that a phone number is also your identifier for end-to-end encrypted chat messaging apps including both Signal and WhatsApp. And the brilliant Alec Muffett entered the number into both apps… and found that Boris Johnson appears to be a user of both.

In case you don’t know, if you put in the phone number of someone you know, it will tell you if they’re on Signal or WhatsApp, and Boris quite clearly was — though after the press got ahold of this he finally changed his number, despite keeping it for so many years. And thus, as seen in the image both above and below, we know that Boris Johnson has at least set up accounts on both of the major end-to-end encrypted messaging platforms:

Alec checked a few other services that use phone numbers as an identifier, and found no evidence of Johnson on Telegram or SnapChat. However, his use of Signal and WhatsApp is especially interesting, given that his government is working overtime to ban encryption for consumers. There was reporting just a few weeks ago that a bunch of Ministers were using both Signal and WhatsApp while still being a part of the government trying to ban encryption, but having Boris Johnson being among them really takes this all to a whole new level.

It truly shows how hypocritical they are, recognizing the value of such private messaging in their own lives, while trying to block others from using it.

Filed Under: , , , , , ,
Companies: signal, whatsapp

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Boris Johnson's Phone Number Leaks: Turns Out He Uses End-To-End Encryption… While Trying To Ban It For Everyone Else”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
Anonymous Coward says:

This is why I find every government’s attempts to ban E2E (in some cases sneakily wording it to SAY they’re not banning it but effectively banning it) so hollow and unjustified.

So they can have encryption and be opaque but OUR lives have to be transparent for their convenience? Uh huh. Rules for thee, not for me much?

I agree with TAC, if they want to ban E2E then they should lead by example and live under the same rules they wish to impose upon us, no exceptions.

Anonymous Coward says:

no surprise here! it’s no different to every other government! they’ree all doing the same thing, not to ‘think of the children’ or anyone else, only themselves and their rich and powerful friends while putting all of the ordinary people, everywhere, under the spotlight and, inevetibly, under the cosh! all politicians and government representatives wanna remain annonymous and keep all teir dealings secret but need to know who is looking into what they’re doing!

Tavis says:

Is it hypocricy if

they believe the use of encryption is only good for covertly conducting in criminal and terroristic activity but they use it anyway?

At least we give them the benefit of reasonable doubt by suggesting this is a contradiction. We believe it is because we know better, but the possibility it is not a contradiction to them is a far scarier notion.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...