How Reading Books Instead Of News Made Me A Better Citizen

from the consuming-information dept

As the 2020 presidential race kicks into high-gear, I find myself telling friends about an important lesson I learned last time primary season rolled around. During the run-up to the 2016 election, as now, vitriol filled the headlines. Rather than well-informed, reading the internet often left me feeling emotionally exhausted, powerless, and alone. So many stories were urgent but not important, and certainly not actionable.

Frustrated, I decided to run an experiment. I read and engaged with dramatically less news, and spent that time reading books instead. I read ancient philosophy, fantastical adventures, historical biographies, scientific treatises, globetrotting thrillers, and mind-bending stories of magical realism. I followed my enthusiasm and read what I loved, challenging myself to think more deeply and broadly in the process.

After a few months, my life and outlook had changed completely. Reading was no longer an exercise in rubbernecking and literature armed me to face the challenges of the present with fresh eyes, seek out other points of view, and put the political turmoil into perspective. Taking ownership of my media diet turned the stories I read into sources of strength, fuel to fire my own personal and public life. My wife and I volunteered to host a Ugandan refugee in our home for nine months. I helped design a game that illustrated emerging vulnerabilities in American democracy. I co-created an internet public art project that raised money for ProPublica.

We are what we pay attention to. The stories we read don’t just inform, entertain, or inspire, they shape our identities, become a part of us. These stories have consequences. The Allies were inspired to defeat the Nazis by stories of resisting oppression, protecting freedom, and ending humanitarian disaster. The Nazis were themselves inspired by stories of racial superiority, national dominance, and the return to a mythical past. Humans are capable of transcendence and unspeakable horror when we convince ourselves of the righteousness of our cause.

So I expanded my experiment into a novel that quickly grew into a trilogy. Bandwidth explores what happens when someone hijacks our attention in order to transform us into the person they want us to be. Borderless examines the rise of tech platforms and the decline of nation-states. Breach extrapolates what might come next and how to build new institutions for the internet age. My hope is that the Analog Series inspires readers to reassess their own most deeply held beliefs with candor, kindness, and healthy skepticism.

As candidates and special interest groups ruthlessly vie for your attention across the vast datascapes of the internet like gladiators in a digital Colosseum, remember that seizing control of your media diet is the first step toward acting with intention to realize your version of a better future.


Eliot Peper is the author of Breach, Borderless, Bandwidth, Cumulus, True Blue, Neon Fever Dream, and the Uncommon Series. His writing has appeared in the Verge,, Harvard Business Review, VICE, OneZero, TechCrunch, and the Los Angeles Review of Books, and he has given talks at Google, Comic Con, Future in Review, and SXSW.

Filed Under: , , ,

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “How Reading Books Instead Of News Made Me A Better Citizen”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re:

Thanks for being a fuckwit, fuckwit. Thinking about the human condition and acting on those thoughts would be so much less important and entertaining without a real downside to consider, like you.

I think the post author makes a rather good point which many people would do well to consider.

And i don’t think that identifying oneself, nor pointing out where to find ones thinking in longer form, is "an advertisement diguised as an article". But any advertisement based on, "if you are interested in more of my stuff, here’s where you can find it" via an unobtrusive link that you have to click on to see the link or go to the linked site is rather the best and most innocuous form of advertising in existence. We could do with more of that, over the other various advertising models.

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

This comment has been deemed insightful by the community.
Anonymous Coward says:

I didn’t deliberately opt out of the news in the last election cycle. I swore off news while I was in college. Having nothing better to do, I once spent a half hour watching a TV news broadcast which went 25 minutes without even making a passing allusion to anything that had happened that day. I decided the information density of that medium wasn’t worth the trouble of straining it out.

So when the last election came around, I was already busy helping create electronic editions of public-domain books (for Project Gutenberg, etc.). Legal constraints meant that most of them were published before 1970; my priorities included books from before 1600; the history of mathematics, engineering, technology, and crafts; musicology–both art and folk music; natural sciences of all kinds; tours of museums and natural/historic sites–and old mysteries and science fiction. Along the way I helped post some 400 books for anyone to read; shared my priorities by my choices of books; learned some new priorities; and wrote a bit: mostly poetry and literary analysis.

I suppose somewhere elections, superb-owls, 1/4-of-the-world-series, and golf tournaments manage to carry on without me (insofar as they are able.) Not knowing whom to hate and slander, I end up hating less and slandering fewer people. Not knowing who is most successful at children’s games, I don’t know whom to despise. And I don’t miss any of it. In fact, I don’t have TIME for any of it.

I make time for reading Techdirt, Dilbert, and xkcd, though.

Anonymous Coward (user link) says:

yeah, 90% of the news media output is cr@p — but 75% of books are cr@p content.

the hollow "read books" platitude has been around for centuries.

How does one know which books to read ?

There are over 33 million books in prin and hundreds of thousands new ones published each year.
How many books can one read in a year?

True, useful information is what you want — the medium of its communication is unimportant, as long as it works effectiely.

Anonymous Coward says:

The non-stop bad news disturbs me as well, especially the blatant disavowal of the principles that brought this country together, as most recently exemplified by the US Senate’s inaction this week. I don’t know how to stop the fascism that’s sweeping the country, but I do find peace of mind via canvassing for my preferred presidential candidate, Elizabeth Warren.

Anonymous Coward says:

"Read books, not news, to enrich your minds" is a nice enough message.

"I have published some books that encourage readers to enrich their minds" is also nice.

But when you say both in the same article, the latter message makes the former seem self-serving.

I have no objection to people promoting their own books on Techdirt. That’s fine. And I’m certainly never going to argue against the benefits of reading. But saying, "You all should be reading more books, and you can start by reading mine," is only going to undermine the idea that you want people to read books for the sake of their own enrichment, rather than to sell copies of what you yourself have written.

It just feels like a slimy marketing tactic, even if it’s meant sincerely.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...