Politicians Queue Up To Make France's Proposed Law Against 'Hateful Content' Far, Far Worse

from the gag-that-ag-gag dept

The intent behind “ag-gag” laws is pretty evident. The aim is to prevent the general public learning about unsatisfactory or downright cruel conditions in which animals are kept by some farmers. Techdirt has been reporting on them for a number of years. Fortunately, US courts are increasingly throwing them out as unconstitutional. So far, ag-gag laws seems to be a US specialty, but that may be about to change. A new law under discussion in France would force online companies to remove “hateful content” from their networks within 24 hours. The journalist Marc Rees spotted a proposed amendment to the law that would define the following content as “hateful” (via Google Translate):

stigmatizing agricultural activities, breeding or sale of products from agriculture and livestock breeding and inciting acts of intrusion or violence vis-à-vis professionals of agriculture, livestock breeding and the processing and sale of products from these sectors

As an article in Numerama (original in French) points out:

All these criminal acts are already repressed by the law. For example, death threats are handled in the penal code, with several years in prison and a fine of up to tens of thousands of euros. Ditto for the night intrusions, which can be assimilated to a violation of domicile

The only thing that this proposed amendment adds to the current law in France is the requirement for online services to take down posts that “stigmatize” farmers in some vague way — an ag-gag law, in other words.

Trying to turn proposed legislation against “hateful content” into an ag-gag law is just one example of how a bad idea is being made into a worse one. Other amendments have been put forward that would force online companies to remove within 24 hours “hateful” posts about physical appearance, disabilities, political opinions, mother tongue, cultural practices, and many other areas where feelings often run high (original in French, behind paywall). One amendment even wants an open list of “hateful” things that have to be taken down within 24 hours, so that new categories can be added in the future without needing to amend the legislation. It will be fun watching how French politicians fight among themselves over what should or shouldn’t be included from the long list of proposed additions. The danger is clearly that whatever the outcome, the harm to freedom of speech in France — and maybe beyond — will be even worse than critics of the new law feared.

Follow me @glynmoody on Twitter, Diaspora, or Mastodon.

Filed Under: , , , , ,

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Politicians Queue Up To Make France's Proposed Law Against 'Hateful Content' Far, Far Worse”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
15 Comments
That One Guy (profile) says:

Light-speed would have nothing on them

The danger is clearly that whatever the outcome, the harm to freedom of speech in France — and maybe beyond — will be even worse than critics of the new law feared.

Given France has argued in the past that right-to-rewrite history orders should apply globally that is not at all an unlikely hypothetical. If they cram that legal trainwreck through the question would not be ‘would they try to enforce it globally?’, but rather ‘how quickly would they try to enforce it globally?’

Anonymous Coward says:

Will they try and enforce this law in the eu,not just france
if so free speech will be severely limited, if sites like youtube,
only allowed french videos to be seen in france It would send a message,
bad laws limiting free speech effect users and the public more than
anyone else.
many websites may choose to block all user comments and uploads
from france in order to reduce legal costs .
It seems every month someone proposes a new law which limits free speech on the web.

Anonymous Coward says:

The printing press led to imprimatur, that is a license to print to protect the power of church and state, for all the good that actually achieved. It now seems like those in power are going down the same road with respect to publishing on the Internet. I just hope the result is not another period of violence to establish a new world order accommodating the power shift that the Internet enables.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: More whack-a-mole with statements some people dont like

It’s been labeled "hate speech" because a major issue for animal-rights activists has been Kosher and Halal slaughter, which would have been under any normal circumstance banned as a cruel and inhumane practice in 21st century Europe, except that it’s a required religious ritual by two prominent minority {non-Christian] religious communities.

So if you’re against animal cruelty, then you’re a Nazi.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published.

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »