Techdirt Podcast Episode 143: No Easy Answers: Facebook & The Election

from the it's-never-so-simple dept

I don’t think I need to say much to introduce this week’s topic — we’re all well aware of the conversation about Facebook’s role in the presidential election, including questions of filter bubbles, fake news, foreign influence, and so on and so on. As is always the case in situations like this, a lot of people seem to be looking for easy answers, and easy places to point fingers of blame, so in this week’s episode we’re discussing why it’s just not that simple.

Follow the Techdirt Podcast on Soundcloud, subscribe via iTunes or Google Play, or grab the RSS feed. You can also keep up with all the latest episodes right here on Techdirt.

Filed Under: , ,
Companies: facebook

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Techdirt Podcast Episode 143: No Easy Answers: Facebook & The Election”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
crade (profile) says:

In my humble opinion, we are missing the issue here. We already have central authorities on truth that people have earned people’s trust.

The problem here is not that there is misinformation being spread, the problem is that there is systematic controlled effort to interfere in the election and control election results.

The solution is for your government to have an intelligence agency that effectively monitors for attempts to infiltrate your elections and gets in front of them. In this case, expose the interference, either publicly or to the companies so that they can act on it.

Anonymous Anonymous Coward (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re:

The problem with your analysis is what ‘truth’ they can ‘create’ via various and known methodologies. The ‘truth’ is what one makes the ‘truth’ to be, see ‘fake news’ and the ability (or inability) to combat that. Irrefutable evidence is solely dependent upon the ‘explainer’ of any ‘evidence’, see prosecutors convicting innocent people over and over again.

Irrefutable? What is that? The police say x happened, the video says y happened, and it is up to the defense to prove them wrong, which is entirely contrary to the concept of innocent until proven guilty.

The government is actually a central authority on what they say they are a central authority on. Whether we believe them is another matter entirely.

mermaldad (profile) says:

Not Perfect, But...

It seems to me that there could be an algorithm that polls users about ads, news stories, and links to form a consensus of whether the item is true. Then the algorithm could frame the ad based on this rating. Everyone is still able to click on it if they want to, but at least they have been warned. The algorithm could weight the opinions of users based on their past history to reduce the chance of errors due to someone gaming the system or general ignorance.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...