US Is Officially Out Of The TPP, Though Not For Any Of The (Many) Good Reasons

from the but-at-least-that's-behind-us dept

We’ve been quite vocal for more than six years about the problems of the Trans Pacific Partnership (TPP) agreement, and why it would do really bad things for intellectual property laws and expand the concept of corporate sovereignty over national laws. Throughout the campaign, both major candidates, Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton, campaigned against the agreement, though many people (quite reasonably) doubted Clinton’s sincerity over that position.

On the flip side, no one doubted Trump’s sincerity — but many of us disagreed with his reasons. Still, it’s at least marginally good news to have Trump officially get us out of the TPP negotiations, effectively killing the agreement.

President Trump formally abandoned the Trans-Pacific Partnership on Monday, pulling away from Asia and scrapping his predecessor?s most significant trade deal on his first full weekday in office, administration officials said.

Mr. Trump sharply criticized the partnership agreement during last year?s campaign, calling it a bad deal for American workers. Although the deal had not been approved by Congress, the decision to withdraw the American signature at the start of Mr. Trump?s administration is a signal that he plans to follow through on promises to take a more aggressive stance against foreign competitors.

Of course, as per in the campaign, Trump’s reasons for withdrawing are not the same reasons we were concerned about the TPP. Trump seems to be focused on extreme protectionism and tariffs, a position that will do massive harm to the US economy. And, of course, there’s reasonable fear that in doing the right thing for the wrong reasons, what comes up instead will be even worse.

And, of course, in completely dropping out of TPP, it also means throwing out the baby with the bathwater — including some parts of the TPP that would actually be quite useful, including the sections on the free flow of information across borders, which is important to keeping the internet functioning globally, blocking the ability of authoritarian countries to demand localized servers (that can be used for surveillance or to cut off access to the global internet) and more. And, as of yet, there is no indication that the new administration cares about any of this.

So, yes, it’s good that the TPP is dead. It was a bad agreement put together in secrecy with lots of bad elements. But, we need to watch quite carefully what comes next, with the recognition that it very well could be worse.

Filed Under: , , , , ,

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “US Is Officially Out Of The TPP, Though Not For Any Of The (Many) Good Reasons”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
Ninja (profile) says:

“including some parts of the TPP that would actually be quite useful, including the sections on the free flow of information across borders, which is important to keeping the internet functioning globally, blocking the ability of authoritarian countries to demand localized servers (that can be used for surveillance or to cut off access to the global internet) and more”

Considering he means to effectively kill the Internet as we know today by gutting the FCC and killing net neutrality protections I don’t think this would have any chance of surviving. As for the surveillance and cutting access the intelligence outfits in the US and copyright has those covered already. So.. Win?

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: The mere fact...

hey…. let them spin it like Trump is bad no matter which decision he made.

I am all for making the right decisions for the right reason’s, but I can hold my tongue with the right decision being made for the wrong reasons.

Others have to nit pick no matter what, which is what I am usually accused of.

That One Guy (profile) says:

Re: Re: The mere fact...

The problem with doing the right thing for the wrong reasons is that if the issue comes up again and the particular bad reason isn’t there the second/third/fourth time then the person might not object for the ‘right’ reasons and let it through. Simply presenting the same rotten problem under a different name and with slight tweaks can be enough to let it slip through.

On the other hand if someone is doing the right thing for the right reasons then dressing up the same problem slightly different isn’t going to help much, as the core problem is still there and so is the objection to it.

Deimal (profile) says:

To be fair

On more than one occasion he offered one of the reasons being the investor-state dispute courts. If I recall correctly, that was disliked pretty strongly here and (for me anyway) was a good enough reason alone to kill it. Let alone the continued promulgation of terrible US IP laws around the world (not one of Trump’s reasons iirc) or the fact that it was negotiated in secret with no public input (any of the 3 would by itself be enough for me)

Anonymous Coward says:

Reminds me of the previous trade bill failures

Brings to mind other horrible bills filled with all sorts of terrible provisions. But what killed it was the EU farm lobby of all things – with their completely untenable regional food naming demands. When parmesan cheese has been produced outside of Parma for generations you aren’t going to get the rest of the world to agree to it.

Koby says:

So tough

It’s tough for some authors to admit that a political opponent like Trump could do a better job of trashing these corporate trade agreements than their golden boy Obama. I’m hopeful Trump is going to prove that all sides of the political spectrum need to NOT elect the usual cronies during the primary process, which will result in far superior decisions being made than the usual career politicians, no matter who wins the November election.

Roger Strong (profile) says:

From the CBC: How NAFTA renegotiations might unfold

TPP is dead. Long live TPP

A year ago it seemed NAFTA might be superseded by the TPP. All three NAFTA countries were onboard.

Now it’s the other way around.

At his confirmation hearing Thursday, treasury secretary nominee Steven Mnuchin said the TPP could be a "starting point" for NAFTA talks.

Already-agreed-upon TPP chapters — on labour, environmental standards, intellectual property, or e-commerce — could migrate.

If seen as minor amendments, TPP text could become NAFTA annexes or side letters.

So, on to the next round of TPP negotiations.

Anonymous Coward says:

It may not be the end of TPP, overall, as the other 11 nations are going to try and ratify TPP without the United States.

Of course, they will have to open negotiations again to change it, since the current TPP requires ratification by both Japan and the USA to come into force.

Maybe without America on board, they can scale back the draconian copyright policies in the agreement, who knows.

Of course, there could still be a 12th nation. If California, Oregon, and Washington all hold the proposed 2019 vote on secession from the United States, and the Republic Of Pacifica is created, I think that the Pacificans would join the TPP, as Hollywood would all but demand it, for the copyright laws they want. That is why I, as a Californian, will be voting no on secession, if voters in all three states, on the 2018 ballot, give the green light for the 2019 secession vote.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...