Good To See: Blockstream Promises Not To Abuse Patents

from the more-companies-should-do-this dept

Over the years, we’ve discussed various examples of tech companies taking a stand against patent abuse. That is, in lieu of actual patent reform to fix a broken system, some companies are doing things on their own (we even had a podcast discussing a bunch of examples). One of my personal favorites was Twitter’s Innovator’s Patent Agreement which effectively lets the named inventors on the patent issue their own licenses to undermine trolls should the patents ever fall into trollish hands. Think of it as something of a poison pill to make the patents worth a lot less to pure trolls. One of the tricks though has been convincing smaller startups to take some of these steps — even the license on transfer network, which is sort of a no brainer for startups. So it’s good to see, as pointed out by EFF, that Blockstream, a fascinating company in the blockchain space that employs a ton of super smart people, take a big commitment to be a good player in the patent realm..

As detailed by the EFF, Blockstream’s plan has three components — all of which are good:

  • It adopted a patent pledge promising that it will only use its own software patents defensively ? that is, it won?t use them to sue or demand licensing fees others for using similar technologies, but it may use them to defend itself from the patent lawsuits of others.
  • It shared its patents under the Defensive Patent License (DPL), licensing its patents to any other person or company who agrees to the terms of the DPL.
  • It introduced a modified version of the Innovator?s Patent Agreement, an agreement with Blockstream inventors that it may file patents for their inventions but may not use them offensively (if Blockstream ever assigns a patent to another party, the agreement would apply to that party too).
  • Hopefully as we see companies like Blockstream commit to these kinds of things, it will inspire more startups to do similar things.

    Filed Under: , , ,
    Companies: blockstream

    Rate this comment as insightful
    Rate this comment as funny
    You have rated this comment as insightful
    You have rated this comment as funny
    Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
    You have flagged this comment
    The first word has already been claimed
    The last word has already been claimed
    Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

    Comments on “Good To See: Blockstream Promises Not To Abuse Patents”

    Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
    JNG says:

    That’s hilarious.

    Your realize Mikey, that Blockstream not only has no patents, it doesn’t even have any published pending patent applications? Their promise is about as meaningful as a women with no ovaries “promsing” not to get pregnant. You folks are such predictable stooges for anything anti-IP and will lap up any pablum that’s flavored the right way.

    Ninja (profile) says:

    Re: Re:

    And you IP morons are very different, right? Never released any biased, factless studies or data, never paid people to parrot your debunked points… Saints you people are, SAINTS.

    As for the fact that it seemingly doesn’t have patents, at some point Google didn’t have either. You can’t predict how things will be in the future and a pledge now may be of great help to everybody. So shut up and go back to your cave.

    Anonymous Coward says:

    Re: Re: Re:

    Ninja made an interesting comment regarding Google.

    As it turns out, Google filed its first patent application three years after it was incorporated, so his statement that “at some point Google didn’t have [any patents] either” is correct.

    As of today, 18 years after it was incorporated and 13 years after its first patent issued, Google has more than 12,000 issued U.S. patents with hundreds more pending.

    JNG says:

    Re: Re: Re: Re:

    That’s not quite accurate; GOOGLE’s patent on PageRank was filed by Page long before they were incorporated:

    Google had to take a license from Stanford as part of their business; and you can darn well know Stanford did not have any weird non-enforcement provisions

    Thus while their home-grown stuff came later, they had the benefit of solid IP protection from day 1. And, btw, Stanford spins off dozens of companies a year, but makes no “pledges” with their IP of course as that would render it useless, or, about as valuable as the non-existent IP offered by Blockstream.

    Anonymous Coward says:

    Re: Re: Re:2 Re:

    You got me there. I was only looking at Google’s patents and not what others were doing before Google. So, while Google may not have had any patents itself “at some point,” as alleged by Ninja, they apparently had a license to at least one patent from day 1. Essentially, Google always had patents.

    Anonymous Coward says:

    Re: Re:

    “promising that it will only use its own software patents defensively”

    This sounds familiar, hmmmmm
    What was the name of that patent collecting organization that promised to only use their patents for defensive puposes?

    Perhaps Nathan Myhrvold could help us remember …. oh yeah – it’s Intellectual Ventures! Remember them? What are they doing now with all those patents?

    That One Guy (profile) says:

    Re: Re:

    The point of the pledges is to protect against something like that, making it much more difficult to use the patents offensively.

    If they’ve got it down in writing that they won’t sue over their patents, and somewhere down the line they do, then the target would have at the least a decent defense pointing to the original pledge and claiming that they only used the patents because they were told they wouldn’t be sued.

    Add Your Comment

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

    Comment Options:

    Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

    What's this?

    Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

    Follow Techdirt

    Techdirt Daily Newsletter

    Techdirt Deals
    Techdirt Insider Discord
    The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...