Daily Deal: Cafflano Coffeemaker And Cup
from the good-deals-on-cool-stuff dept
The ultimate travel coffee mug is here for those who prefer theirs freshly ground and brewed. The $99 Cafflano Coffeemaker And Cup is a grinder, filter, kettle and tumbler rolled into one portable package. Hand grind your beans, place in the stainless steel filter over the tumbler and pour in your hot water. It is easy to clean with no wasted filters or pods or cups to toss and with no DRM. At less than 8″ tall, the Cafflano can slip into any bag and be ready to help you brew that perfect cup of joe anytime and anywhere.
Note: The Techdirt Deals Store is powered and curated by StackCommerce. A portion of all sales from Techdirt Deals helps support Techdirt. The products featured do not reflect endorsements by our editorial team.
Filed Under: daily deal
Comments on “Daily Deal: Cafflano Coffeemaker And Cup”
Still needing to provide hot water certainly limits this thing’s usefulness I imagine.
The problem with most coffee making things is how messy they are.
You rarely see a picture of them that doesn’t have a giant mess of spilled coffee beans all around them.
They’re just too messy to use – especially when traveling…
“Ships to: Continental US”
I get that the majority of your readers are within the continenal US, but could you please make an effort to partner with people who ship globally? This seems to happen every time I see physical goods on here that I’d actually consider paying money for. (Which is admittedly not often.)
Re: Re:
I get that the majority of your readers are within the continenal US, but could you please make an effort to partner with people who ship globally? This seems to happen every time I see physical goods on here that I’d actually consider paying money for. (Which is admittedly not often.)
We actually do try — but it’s not always possible.
Worthless injunction
The domain is an “IO” extension and the database is likely not in the US. There is a serious question as to the application of the injunction outside of the US. SHE COULD EASILY AVOID US infringement by blocking US IP address access.
All the plaintiff has done is ensure publicity for the site.
I am not familiar with the terms applied to subscribers whose credentials she is apparently using. Can you address those?