John Oliver Takes On Government Surveillance With Help From Ed Snowden And… Some Dick Pics

from the put-it-in-terms-of-your-junk dept

Once again, it seems that John Oliver is doing a show on topics that we regularly talk about in these parts. And he’s pretty damn good at it. Last night’s episode was all about government surveillance, focused mainly on Section 215 of the PATRIOT Act and the fact that it’s set to sunset on June 1st if Congress doesn’t renew it (and, of course, there’s been no debate at all on it, meaning that late in May you’ll see a frantic, crazed and fact-free “debate” in which fearmongers will insist that we’re all going to die if it’s not extended). Oliver actually flew to Moscow and interviewed Ed Snowden as part of the episode:

Believe it or not, Oliver actually challenged Snowden a lot more than most of Snowden’s interviews, which is pretty interesting (but perhaps not that surprising — given that Oliver also gave former NSA boss Keith Alexander his most challenging interview in Oliver’s very first episode). Oliver challenged Snowden on whether or not journalists could do a good enough job keeping some of the information in the documents secret (pointing to one particular fuck up in which there was a bad redaction). He also questioned how carefully Snowden reviewed all of the info before handing it over.

But, much more of the interview (and the rest of the show) actually focused on getting the public to actually care about what was going on. Oliver used the late night talk show TV trope of asking people on the street what they knew about Ed Snowden and what he revealed (the answer: basically nothing), and then flipped it around to ask them how they would feel if photos they or their loved ones took of their penises should be collected by the NSA. Then, suddenly, they were worried about the government’s surveillance capabilities. That leads to Oliver coaxing Snowden into explaining the power of government surveillance — including Section 215, Executive Order 12333, the PRISM program and even (barely) the upstream collection program under Section 702 of the FISA Act (not named in the show, though the others are) — about how it allows the government to collect “dick picks” (which Snowden will only call “photos of your junk.”)

It’s an amusing segment, but I’m not convinced it’s as powerful as it could have been (or as Oliver has been on other topics), in which he has been able to get people really motivated to be angry and speak out about certain injustices. And that’s too bad, because this is a huge issue. I recognize it’s a lot to ask of a primarily comedy show, but Oliver has been so successful at getting people worked up on issues like net neutrality, that it’s almost a disappointment that he’s not able to create the same level of outrage over government surveillance. In fact, most of the news coverage of Oliver’s interview seems to be about the mundane aspects of his interview with Snowden, such as whether or not he misses “hot pockets.”

Filed Under: , , , , , ,

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “John Oliver Takes On Government Surveillance With Help From Ed Snowden And… Some Dick Pics”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Actually, I disagree Mike about whether it was as powerful as it could have been

I agree. If anything the American public has shown it’s pretty much immune to moral outrage, justified or not. This had to be packaged differently.

I’m still doubtful it will engage an apathetic, uneducated, and worn-out public, though.

Uriel-238 (profile) says:

Re: This Should Be Included In the Discussion

Um, yes.

Not a new problem. This was a device in the toobox by which J. Edgar Hoover was able to become a political powerhouse. Also the CIA gets their black-box projects approved by way of biographical leverage.

It’s less of a concern than the corporate bonus packages that keep our legislators pushing through company-friendly agendas. I suspect they invoke biographical leverage too.

No, the US Government is an endless fellatio chain that doesn’t care about us commoners anymore. It doesn’t really matter what the devices are that keep the toe-line straight.

Anonymous Coward says:

Chicken Little was right, the sky is falling? Take your military industrial complex that runs on the backs of American workers, and the blood of our sons and daughters, and stick it where the sun doesn’t shine. Don’t you sweat the small stuff Mr. Snowden, we have got you covered. If the U.S. government doesn’t respect our privacy why should we respect theirs? Lead by example or get the hell out of the way.

Anonymous Coward says:

It’s depressing how many people said Ed leaked information to Wikileaks. Where do they get their information from? Are they getting it from prime time propaganda news programs on TV?

Oliver appears to be right about one thing. The repercussions of mass surveillance is currently beyond most people’s comprehension. Unless mass surveillance is phrased as ‘dick pics’. In which case people can immediate comprehend and relate to it.

fairuse (profile) says:

Describe complex issues in terms familiar to folks

People don’t care how phones, internet, and any device in their house does what it does; Smart-devices.
Item Phone: was a thing wired to the wall — now it is a computer.
Item Internet: It’s a way to do things regardless of how foolish a thing can be — count the number of penis flashing on social apps. Chatroulette being what it is.
Item TV, computer, tablet are used by folks to do pretty much everything.

Case of streaming video: There is a huge gap between what marketing tells a person and fact that the average person watching video has no clue about how pretty moving pictures got there. Experts lecture, people twitter that video sucks.

Case of trying to reach an audience that cannot fit the “Big NSA watching them” into their reality: Enter Mr. Oliver. His job of predigesting the law and painting a familiar picture for normal folks. Picture of penis vs bits of data.

Maybe I see too much crazy stuff online but most people treat pictures, video and in-the-clear e-mail rants as just life — one big High School/College Frat party.

I think John Oliver did a good job getting the word out to a large number of people who zoneout once the tech speak starts.

Maybe folks should watch CBS Person of Interest and get a hint of the real scary stuff; AI with no human controls. Save that for 2080 generation.

Uriel-238 (profile) says:

It's a harsh lesson for our constitutional framers, too.

We build a civilization (to paraphrase Donald Rumsfeld) with the people we have, not the people we wish we had.

And yeah, they were expected to stay informed about their own best interests, and vote based on them, not based on horserace leaders or predetermined identity.

The common American worries about their own dick-pics and whether or not Obama may be a Kenyan terrorist. That’s the mean.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...