Good News: Internet Ad Industry Realizes It Needs To Embrace HTTPS

from the about-time... dept

About a year ago, when we switched to default HTTPS, we pointed out that one of the major reasons why other news sites refused to do the same was that most ad networks would not support HTTPS. In fact, we had to end a number of relationships with ad partners in order to make the move (but we felt it was worth it). In fact, the really crazy part was that many of the ad network partners we spoke to clearly had absolutely no clue about HTTPS, what it was and why it’s important. But, over the past year, more and more attention has been placed on the value and importance of encrypting web traffic, so it’s great to see that the internet ad industry is starting to wake up to this, even if it’s pretty late in the process.

The Internet Advertising Bureau — the IAB — the main standards-setting board for the internet ad industry has released a statement saying that it’s time for the internet advertising world to embrace HTTPS:

It?s time to talk about security.

In fact, last year was the time to talk about security. From The New York Times to Google, the call went out for websites to encrypt communications with their users, protecting the integrity and privacy of information exchanged in both directions. Even the U.S. government heard this call, and is working to require HTTPS delivery of all publicly accessible Federal websites and web services.

This year, the advertising industry needs to finish catching up. Many ad systems are already supporting HTTPS – a survey of our membership late last year showed nearly 80% of member ad delivery systems supported HTTPS. That?s a good start, but doesn?t reflect the interconnectedness of the industry. A publisher moving to HTTPS delivery needs every tag on page, whether included directly or indirectly, to support HTTPS. That means that in addition to their ad server, the agency ad server, beacons from any data partners, scripts from verification and brand safety tools, and any other system required by the supply chain also needs to support HTTPS.

Let?s break that down a bit more – once a website decides to support HTTPS, they need to make sure that their primary ad server supports encryption. That ad server will sometimes need to include tags from brand safety, audience and viewability measurement, and other tools – all of which also need to support encryption. The publisher?s ad server will often direct to one of several agency ad servers, each of which will also need to serve over HTTPS. Each agency ad server also may include a variety of beacons or tags, depending on how the deal was set up, all of which similarly need to have encrypted versions available. That?s a lot of dependencies – and when one fails to support HTTPS, the website visitor?s experience is impacted, initiating a costly search for the failure point by the publisher.

While I question that 80% number — given that we had difficulty finding many ad providers who supported HTTPS a year ago — it’s good to see the industry finally recognizing how important this is.

Filed Under: , , , ,
Companies: iab

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Good News: Internet Ad Industry Realizes It Needs To Embrace HTTPS”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
Anonymous Coward says:

Yes, let's do that.

It’s time to talk about security.

Yes. It is. And the best course of action for any user concerned about security and privacy is to block all advertising. It should be crystal-clear to everyone that advertisers will use spam and spyware, that they’ll invade privacy as much and as often as possible, that they’ll attack security measures, and that they’ll do anything in order to make a buck, no matter how much damage it does.

Advertisers are the enemy.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Yes, let's do that.

And web sites that use 3rd party banner ads rarely monitor them, making it easy for an unscrupulous character to shove malignant code into hundreds, thousands or even millions of computers, and by the time the site owner learns about it and takes action, the damage is already done.

Those that operate on the margins of legitimacy, such as torrent sites, seem to be especially at risk.

Anonymous Coward says:

Beyond security

Forgive me if this information is rather antiquated.

Isn’t a secure connection rather slow to establish compared to plain http? So instead of just querying who knows how many servers for content and being redirected to who knows how many others, people who don’t block ads will now have to establish a secure connection to each one?

Anonymous Coward says:

80% supported

Perhaps that’s like U.S. broadband coverage – nominally 80%, until you actually want service at all 80% of those providers. Or it could be that 80% of the providers have the backend support to run it, but only a small portion of them have adequately informed the account representatives that talk to the site operators, so most account reps say it is unsupported, without knowing whether they are right. It wouldn’t be the first time marketers were wrong.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...