DailyDirt: The Right Stuff From The Original Space Race
from the urls-we-dig-up dept
It’s surprising how poorly documented some of the Apollo missions are now — with lost original footage of the first lunar landing (eventually restored from other recordings). Now we’re entering a new phase of space that’s more privatized, so it’s even more likely that commercial space programs will not be preserved for the benefit of all. Maybe someday all of NASA’s tweets will be safely stored on magnetic tape, and SpaceX’s first reusable rocket landing video will be preserved in HD. Or maybe we’ll have to check on Elon Musk’s closet after he dies to look for Martian souvenirs.
- Neil Armstrong stashed away some cool stuff from his first walk on the moon — including the camera that was used to record the mission and a bunch of cables and straps. Armstrong’s widow recently found these artifacts in a closet, and historians should probably go through his underwear drawer to check for moon rocks. [url]
- NASA’s first group of astronauts (aka the “Mercury 7”) were a bunch of guys who were put through all kinds of endurance tests to make sure they were made of the right stuff to go into space. However, few people have heard of the group of “Mercury 13” women who also trained to be astronauts in the 1950s (but never got to go to space). [url]
- Hundreds of plant seeds were sent on the 1971 Apollo 14 mission and came back — and some of the “Moon Trees” are still growing today. There wasn’t an official list to keep track of Moon Trees when they were planted in the mid-1970s, but there’s a partial list now maintained by NASA. [url]
If you’d like to read more awesome and interesting stuff, check out this unrelated (but not entirely random!) Techdirt post via StumbleUpon.
Filed Under: apollo, astronauts, elon musk, manned missions, mercury 13, mercury 7, moon trees, neil armstrong, space, space exploration
Companies: nasa, spacex
Comments on “DailyDirt: The Right Stuff From The Original Space Race”
“Maybe someday all of NASA’s tweets will be safely stored on magnetic tape, and SpaceX’s first reusable rocket landing video will be preserved in HD.”
First of all, magnetic tape does not exactly “safely” store things; it degrades over time. And it’s very naïve to think that even without the near-certainty of data degradation, digital media will preserve things as well as the typewriter and film did. Digital formats as well as the physical media they’re written on tend to become obsolete rather quickly. A huge amount of information and history from the early digital age has already been lost this way.
And we can be sure that things are worse today than when the NY Times 1990 article “Lost on Earth: Wealth of Data Found in Space” was written:
http://www.nytimes.com/1990/03/20/science/lost-on-earth-wealth-of-data-found-in-space.html
Wait a second
The lack of source code and the lack of hardware should not be a complete stumper at all. It increases the amount of work needed, but reverse engineering binaries that were compiled for systems that no longer exist is totally a thing that can be done.
Re: Wait a second
Not a ‘complete stumper’ but the question will always be, how much will this restoration cost, and is it worth it? One challenge is reading old data from a magnetic, optical, or NVM storage medium when you lack the hardware required to read it. Reverse-engineering hardware (or even building it from specs) is hardly a trivial task.
Many of us might face this very issue throughout our lives. Like, “How do I get the pictures off my no-longer-working no-name Taiwanese digital camera I bought over 20 years ago?”
Re: Re: Wait a second
I was speaking to the issue of reverse-engineering binaries specifically. I never claimed that it was a trivial thing to do. But it doesn’t have to be expensive! Off the top of my head, I know four qualified engineers who would enjoy doing that work as a fun side-project for little or no charge (for the right organization, anyway).
“Many of us might face this very issue throughout our lives. Like, “How do I get the pictures off my no-longer-working no-name Taiwanese digital camera I bought over 20 years ago?””
I’ve encountered the same issue both personally and professionally for almost my entire career, with media written by equipment far older than that!
Re: Re: Re: Wait a second
It’s funny that the really old stuff often isn’t as hard to deal with. Like punch cards, paper tape, and electronics from the IBM era. It’s the more recent stuff that can get tricky, especially whenever a new technology emerges. That’s when many companies enter the field, and most of them fail, taking their proprietary formats with them. It happened with micro-computers (do people still call them that anymore?), CAD, digital cameras, and a host of other proprietary closed-format products that left consumers out to dry when the company folded, merged, or — like Sony– just felt like leaving its customers stranded and therefore forced to upgrade.
After being burned repeatedly by ‘betting on the wrong horse’, I’ve decided it’s usually best to wait a few years (at least) after something new comes out before investing in any kind of expensive purchase, to minimize the chance of being left with an orphan technology, format, or company.
Re: Re: Re:2 Wait a second
“to minimize the chance of being left with an orphan technology, format, or company.”
Yes, you should not be storing data in proprietary data formats and should avoid any devices that insist that you do. Or, if that’s impossible, export and convert that data to a standard format regularly.