Oblivious Man Staring At iPad Causes Security Meltdown Conga Line

from the iTerrorist dept

We’ve often discussed the complete farce that airport security has become since 9/11. Security theater that appears to be a performance art piece on how dumb government can get isn’t something we should be looking to export, but it seems like many countries throughout the planet have incorporated many of the reactionary tactics you can find in the States.

Take, for instance, the story about how a guy in Australia who accidentally walked in the wrong direction while paying too much attention to his iPad shut down a terminal and delayed flights for an hour.

On Saturday morning, a man got off a plane at Sydney Airport in Australia and was so enchanted by the fascinating content on his iPad that he walked into a domestic terminal without bothering to go through security. This event was captured on CCTV and unnerved officials so much that they evacuated passengers.

Flights were delayed for around an hour. One also wonders about security at Sydney Airport. Australia is currently under high alert after its prime minister, Tony Abbott, declared that a terrorist attack on his country was “likely,” even though his security services hadn’t discovered any “particular plots.”

Terrorism is an issue that should be taken seriously, but if the civilized world is going to simply give up so much sense as to let a guy accidentally walking the wrong direction to essentially shut down an airport for an hour, then we might as well just admit defeat in our own minds. I see people pulling this oblivious move on my city’s streets every damn day. It’s annoying, sure, but it’s fairly easy to determine that these people aren’t going to be blowing up any buildings any time soon.

Well, maybe after they beat that Candy Crush level, but certainly not before. In the meantime, it’s been over a decade, so we can all just calm down a bit when it comes to pretending to do airport security?

Filed Under: , , , ,

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Oblivious Man Staring At iPad Causes Security Meltdown Conga Line”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re:

No, see, what needs to be done is charging music labels and the RIAA for quaternary liability, even if the man wasn’t listening to music.

Since they can argue that the price of mobile phones and devices must be increased as they may be used for piracy, obviously they must be held responsible because the guy might have been listening to music!

Anonymous Coward says:

“Terrorism is an issue that should be taken seriously […]”

No. It should not. It’s a trivial and inconsequential threat with very, very low occurrence probability. Anyone who actually has the time and wit to talk about “terrorism” isn’t actually terrorized: terrorized people do not speak cogently and discourse at length, they scream in incoherent fright.

The entire “terrorism” scam is a farce cooked up by governments eager to use it to excuse (a) military adventures and (b) power grabs.

That One Guy (profile) says:

Re: Re:

Indeed, countless dangers killed(and continue to do so) far more people than terrorists could ever dreams of, on a yearly basis at that, yet some losers kill 3,000 people with a pair of planes and suddenly terrorism is the greatest threat on the planet, and needs to have billions thrown into ‘preventing’ it?

If the various governments really cared about saving lives and protecting people, they’d shift some, or even better most of the money currently earmarked for ‘anti-terrorism’ purposes into dealing with threats more likely to claim lives, and that list could likely fill a book.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re: Re: Re:

Actually, I’d argue that after 9/11, those in power were able to use terrorism as an excuse to push for laws that they’d wanted for a long time, and most people couldn’t really be bothered one war or the other, as long as those in power were actively trying to keep things from bothering people in general.

Nothing to do with being scared for the most part; more to do with power-grabbing and apathy.

Vincent Clement (profile) says:

Re: Re:

Think about the 9/11 terrorists. They didn’t evade security or customs. They went right through it. Multiple times. They thought it was easier to go through security rather than skirt it. That’s how effective security was and continues to be.

Every time I travel to the US, I have to laugh at the effort the US puts into securing the border by swiping my passport, asking me silly questions and doing a cursory check of my trunk, when there are so many gaps in that US-Canada border. All but one kilometer of the Ontario-US border is water.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re:

If your security can be defeated by someone staring at an iPad, how difficult is it going to be for a terrorist to get through it?

Well, that’s like saying “If your security can be defeated by someone thinking the door to your house was their door and opening it, how difficult is it going to be for a zombie who’s looking for brains to do it?”

Meaning: the reason security theater generally works is the same reason my pet rock protects me from alligators. It’s all about proximity to the threat.

I think the best security I’ve ever heard of was video security that tracked paths through the airport and tagged movement that was unusual. The second part of the security was sending a trained behavioral security officer to intercept the individual immediately and talk with them. Then if they appeared suspicious, they’d be brought in for questioning.

This system is not in the US, of course, but actually seems to work where it’s deployed. And since the behaviouralists are dressed like airport staff and appear non-threatening, anyone they intercept who they decide isn’t a threat just feels like they’ve been approached by helpful airport staff.

John Fenderson (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re:

“dressed like airport staff and appear non-threatening, anyone they intercept who they decide isn’t a threat just feels like they’ve been approached by helpful airport staff.”

Wait, wait, wait. Nothing about airport staff appears nonthreatening, and any airport staff who approaches me appearing to be “helpful” is automatically suspicious, since only cops do that.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re: Re:

I see that statement a lot, but I can’t agree with it. Terrorists don’t care at all about our airport security unless it’s relevant to their plans. They don’t care about the Fourth Amendment. They care, perhaps, about spreading their terroristic beliefs and maybe about US foreign policy.

They want to hurt us, but I doubt they would consider this sort of thing “hurting” us. I’m fairly confident that their master plan is not to make us have slight delays when someone doesn’t pay attention to the security setup, and it’s not to make us undergo gropings when we want to fly. They wouldn’t get people willing to die for that sort of thing.

Jeremy Lyman (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re: Re:

I think you’re using the definition of ‘terrorist’ preferred by some of those who would leverage our fears “for our own good.”

That seems to lump religious fanatics, genetic supremacists, nutjobs with guns, and generally other ‘non-enlightened’ groups who would oppose the United States government with physical force.

However the goal of actual terrorism is to achieve political gains by leveraging fear. Frequently the threat of harm is a more effective to create fear, panic, and paranoia.

Call me Al says:

Its the pervasive fear that has been created by the constant shouting about terrorism that makes these events so ridiculous.

Before 9/11 someone would have shouted “Hey buddy! You need to go through security.”

The guy would look up, smile in an embarrassed way because of how oblivious he was to the world and then probably jog back round to go through.

Instead they shut down an airport.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re:

Before 9/11 someone would have shouted “Hey buddy! You need to go through security.”

Um, no. Before 9/11, someone would have wanted to know what kind of electronic device he was carrying. “Hey buddy! Do they make Apple Newtons that thin?” They would have walked the wrong way into the terminal together, staring at the screen and watching a streaming vid … oh right, no Wifi.

Anonymous Coward says:

Well, really, I’ve got a whole new terror plan! I’ll get together a few hundred fanatics and have them absentmindedly wandering with their iPads in airports all over the world… the combined hours of shut down airports should easily crumble western capitalistic societies and bring international business to a halt.
And unlike bomb plots, I’ll even be able to reuse my fanatics to wander into other airports tomorrow! Victory!

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...