DailyDirt: Experimenting With Alcohol

from the urls-we-dig-up dept

Freakonomics had an interesting podcast discussing which is more dangerous: alcohol or marijuana? If alcohol didn’t exist and was discovered tomorrow, would it be as acceptable as it currently is? It probably would have hard time getting FDA approval, but then the same could be said of Aspirin, if it didn’t have its long history as a wonder drug. Here are a few more questions to ponder about alcohol the next time you’re not so sober, perhaps.

If you’d like to read more awesome and interesting stuff, check out this unrelated (but not entirely random!) Techdirt post via StumbleUpon.

Filed Under: , , , , , , , , ,

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “DailyDirt: Experimenting With Alcohol”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
Mason Wheeler (profile) says:

Nutt is appealing to investors to fund his research to develop an alcohol substitute that has an antidote — which he claims could have a significantly positive impact on human health since it might eliminate drunk driving and other unwanted effects of intoxication.

Color me skeptical. I just wonder, how often would someone who deliberately chooses to go out and get drunk want to then take an antidote that turns them stone-cold sober? Yes, theoretically it could eliminate drunk driving if the person wanted to take it, but bear in mind that one of the best-known effects of alcohol intoxication is impaired judgment.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re:

At most suburban parties I attended during my youth there was coffee out for those who intended to go home at the end (country parties everyone crashed there, even if that meant sleeping in the tray of a ute or a stable or somewhere, in the city centre most attendees were able to stagger home on foot).

If people were willing to trust in such an ineffective antidote (which only has value in that it makes you marginally less likely to be noticed), an actual working antidote seems viable.

Also, if the antidote works fast enough, it might be worth taking when pulled over at a booze bust.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: This Guy Nutt Lives Up Too His Name

Nutt’s always been in favour or controlled and regulated use of drugs. The reason he was fired from his position as a governmental advisor is that he wanted to relax classifications on drugs, specifically Ecstacy, due to his life long research proving the non-detrimental effects of taking the drug safely.

FYI, taking drugs is not against the law.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...