Funniest/Most Insightful Comments Of The Week At Techdirt
from the politics-and-pricing dept
This week, we were very happy to have a guest post from Jennifer Hoelzer explaining the impact that Techdirt can have in Washington. Not only was it a popular post, Jennifer took both first and second place for insightful this week with her followup comments. Firstly, there was a very thorough response to someone who claimed her story demonstrated the need for lobbyists to “educate” congressional staffers:
With all due respect, sir, I worked on Capitol Hill for 10 years, the White House for 2 and I have a masters degree in public policy from Harvard. I’ve been subjected to so much spin in my life that I can spot it at 100 paces blindfolded. I wouldn’t be a very good communications strategist if I only read/considered issues from one perspective. Unlike some who’s strategy for winning debates is to silence their opposition, I actually work to understand the opposition’s side, so I can understand their thinking, address their concerns and counter their arguments (and maybe change their minds.)
Maybe it’s not the textbook definition, but I define “public advocate” as someone who advocates for interests beyond their own. I’m not saying those people won’t benefit from their advocacy (most public interest advocates got involved because of a personal experience) but that they’re thinking of others, the future, etc. not just how to protect/grow themselves financially at the expense of the interests of others.. Techdirt continued its SOPA/PIPA advocacy even when it hurt them financially. And — as I said — that’s the problem with public advocacy. While a special interest lobbyists could be making high six figures to devote themselves to making sure members of Congress understand their client’s interests, most people who advocate for the public interest do it on their own time, for free. I don’t know about you, but I think if we want to fix society/congress, etc. we need to find a way to make doing good just as profitable as screwing people. (Or at least a little profitable.)
Also – for the record – as I tried to explain in my post, Members of Congress and their staff are more likely to take a stand on an issue when they are confident in their knowledge of an issue. I might know that a lobbyist is spinning me, but I’m probably not going to pick a fight with them publicly unless I know enough about the issue to debate them. And – as I tried to explain — there is so much going on that, you, as a staffer, might say to yourself. “When I get some time, I’m going to research that issue,” but then you get so busy that 6 months later, you’re like “shoot, I really wanted to learn about that, but now the debates over.” I loved Techdirt because it gave me the user perspective on tech issues, that wasn’t being represented in Washington, in an easily digestible and understood way. Understanding the issue made it possible for me to jump on communication opportunities in real time vs. backburnering them until I could learn more.
Again, that’s why I’m giving to Techdirt and I hope others will too.
Next, Jennifer had a short and poignant take on why defeatism gets you nowhere:
Two days before the Jan. 2012 Internet protest, I had a reporter ask me why our office was fighting SOPA/PIPA so hard because “Won’t it be embarrassing when you guys lose.”
As Ron Wyden once told me, “the right thing to do may not have much of a chance, but it has zero chance if no one fights for it.”
For editor’s choice on the insightful side, we start with a response to Amazon’s analysis of price elasticity for ebooks. While Amazon’s data reinforced an important point, That One Guy pulled some additional numbers to show how Amazon may not have gone far enough:
Some extra numbers regarding lower price points
While Amazon notes that the increase in sales between 14.99 and 9.99 is significant, and actually earns the author more when priced lower, a year or so ago Smashwords, another ebook seller, did their own study, and found that the real sweet spot is in the 3-3.99 range, which, according to their data, sells at a rate of 4.3 times more than a book priced at $10(funnily enough the 2-2.99 range only sells at 4.1x comparatively).
Assuming that figure holds up in both indie, and ‘professional’ ebook markets, if the authors really wanted to rake in the cash, and increase their audience size, they’d be pushing the publishers to slash their (currently insane) prices even lower.
Next, we’ve got Mason Wheeler with an attempt to hammer home the message that content isn’t everything:
The industry’s idea is “content is king.” They’ve thought that forever, and they’ve been wrong about it forever. Content is fungible to the point of irrelevancy; get rid of one piece of content and another will show up to take its place. The true king is connectivity.
Create a platform that allows people to interact with each other, and content will arrive to fill it. This has been true since the days of the Pony Express. Create content, and nothing interesting to do with it, and nobody will care.
Connectivity is king. Content is just riding its coattails. Always has been, always will be.
I am still waiting for the comments to load.
Sent from my Verizon iPhone
For second place, we head to the seemingly-too-ludicrous-to-be-true story of the language school that fired a blogger for discussing “homophones”. Lots of people unsurprisingly had jokes to make, but Chronno S. Trigger racked up enough votes to land in second place for funny (plus a lot of insightful votes, too):
It’s a language school. Aren’t they suppose to teach the difference between “Homophones” and “Homophobes”?
For editor’s choice on the funny side, we’ve got two responses to two different bits of news from across the Atlantic. First, in a discussion about the European Commission’s revelatory consultation about copyright and reform, MadAsASnake suggested a means of determining whether the length of current copyright terms are justifiable:
A better test would be to demand that someone who died 70 years ago explains how it benefits him. I’m prepared to accept it if he/she can come up with a really good reason.
Well, it’s the UK…
The last time they let anonymous speech run rampant, they lost 13 colonies.
That’s all for this week, folks!