DailyDirt: The Growing Pains Of Biofuels

from the urls-we-dig-up dept

So far, grabbing fossil fuels out of the ground has been an unbeatable way to get cheap energy. Since fossil fuels (presumably) come from decaying dinosaurs (and their contemporaries), it makes some sense that growing biofuels might be a way to generate a more renewable source of energy. Unfortunately, biofuel projects haven’t quite demonstrated an obviously better way to replace fossil fuels. Here are just a few links to some biofuel info that could lead to more environmentally friendly fuels.

If you’d like to read more awesome and interesting stuff, check out this unrelated (but not entirely random!) Techdirt post via StumbleUpon.

Filed Under: , , , , , , , ,
Companies: cool planet

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “DailyDirt: The Growing Pains Of Biofuels”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
Anon says:

cool planet.

I happen to work for Cool Planet in Colorado. I hate to rain on your parade, but praising them is a little like praising intellectual ventures. Cool planet has no finished technology, and currently produces no products.

Not so much as 1 drop of fuel has exited a Cool Planet project.

Save the praise for when we actually accomplish something. First plant startup should be sometime in 2015.

DB (profile) says:

It’s really easy to carbon with plants and biofuels.

The growing plant captures carbon. Burning the plant or letting it rot releases exactly the same amount of carbon. No more, and no less.

There is no magic. No ‘carbon capture’. No disappearing carbon.

Burning coal is taking solid carbon and releasing it as CO2. Burning oil and gas is taking hydrocarbons and releasing somewhat less CO2 for the same energy. Not tremendously less, just somewhat less. Both are taking carbon previously tucked safely away, and putting it into the atmosphere.

Anonymous Coward says:

I never understood the logic behind corn biofuel. We’re taking our food supply and turning it into gasoline. That means we have less food to eat, which raises food prices.

Growing corn also requires farmers to burn fuel in tractors, in order to plant and harvest corn crops. So all that burnt fuel needs to be subtracted from any net gains of using corn biofuel.

All the while we have this huge unlimited energy source, called the Sun. I suppose it’s hard to charge people for using sunlight, to power their lives. Which is probably why despite all our technological advancements, we can’t seem to build efficient or affordable solar technology.

Humanity’s greed will be this world’s downfall. We’ll even take most species with us to the grave. If we gotta go, everything else is going with us. That’s greed in it’s purest form.

Bergman (profile) says:

I read about a prototype algae reactor that outperformed the same land area of corn by about 10-1 in every metric except initial startup costs.

Higher yield, lower carbon footprint, multiple crops in a year, the algae produces biofuel rather than an additive, cheaper to run after you have the equipment, and the dry algae powder (after the fuel is pressed out) can be burned to power the whole thing.

Brazilian Guy says:

Yes, biofuels mostly contribute by not increasing the net amount of carbon at atmosphere. The biggest trouble they bring is that they innevitably take one resource (food) and turn it into another resource (fuel). Even the corn crops remain have an important role as a source either of nutrients for the ground or as usual, being used to feed cattle, whose dejects and other remains are then used in the ground fertilization. At least, we do in most of third world.

The real gamechanger is the incoming new capacitors able to compete with the contemporary battery technologies. The greatest trouble of energy sources alternative to fossil fuels is the easiness of storage of fossil fuels. Now if artificial diamond or graphene production had a better energy ratio, we could end up burning then and removing CO2 from atmosphere without much trouble, just taking advantage of contemporary solar and wind energy technologies.

Hank Roberts says:

Nobody listens to Cassandra, but this bears repeating

Castro tossed the mob out of Cuba and closed the casinos.
The US banned sugar from Cuba; that boosted corn syrup.
The corn industry grew big enough to lobby the government.
The refineries repurposed MTBE, a toxic waste, as a smog-reducing gasoline additive; so MTBE got into the groundwater: oops!
Ethanol replaced MTBE in gasoline to reduce smog.
Corn ethanol refinery businesses got big enough to lobby the government.
Corn turned out to be a bad feedstock for ethanol for many reasons.
The refineries, wanting to keep refining, look for other plants to stew up to make ethanol: aha, switchgrass! poplar!

What’s wrong with this picture?


Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...