Voltage Pictures Continues To Use Its High Profile Films To Copyright Troll
from the sad dept
Voltage Pictures is the movie studio which famously kicked off the process of copyright trolling by “suing” thousands of people who, it claimed, had illegally downloaded its Oscar-winning movie, Hurt Locker, via Bittorrent, and whose producer, Nicolas Chartier, said that anyone who thought this was a bad plan was a moron and a thief. It recently did the same thing in Canada, and apparently can’t resist still suing fans. The latest is a new lawsuit filed against 31 anonymous people for supposedly using Bittorrent to get Dallas Buyers Club, an Oscar-nominated film from the same studio. This lawsuit at least seems a bit more targeted, in that it tried to make sure the targeted IPs were actually in the jurisdiction of the court, unlike in the Hurt Locker case. These attempts at lumping a bunch of individuals for a single lawsuit has run into trouble in many (though not all) courts. Still, as a way of making sure that a lot of people will simply avoid any Voltage movie, it seems like an effective strategy. It seems like a reasonable rule to not support any company that sues its fans.
Filed Under: copyright, copyright troll, dallas buyers club, joinder, nicolas chartier
Companies: voltage pictures
Comments on “Voltage Pictures Continues To Use Its High Profile Films To Copyright Troll”
Voltage very likely leaked the screener themselves, or paid someone to do it.
Maybe they paid Steele to do it.
I thought about seeing Hurt Locker, but now I never will.
I also will never see The Interpreter, which came up as a full-screen ad on top of my programming due to a Tivo bug and I couldn’t watch my shows for 2 days because of it.
Re: Re: Re:
There are few reviews of Hurt Locker written by people who served in Iraq and Afghanistan, they say the movie is complete bullocks.
Voltage has apparently not even made an attempt to take down available copies (and Google links to them) so are they really concerned about reducing illicit downloads — or are these lawsuits just a money-grab?
Is the sky blue?
Is water wet?
Such are the levels of mystery involved in these cases.
While one can argue that it is a herculean effort to attempt to whack-a-mole to take all of the copies out there, that is how the system is supposed to work.
Google doesn’t host the files, so sending them notices accomplishes nothing beyond being able to claim Google isn’t doing enough.
Trying anything else might hurt their bottom line, so it is easier to allow the content to remain out there and increase their profit stream from pursuing IP addresses and demanding payment from the name on the bill who might not be the guilty party.
They do this while it is clear from the downloads there is demand to see this movie now, rather than in 6-8 months when the sacred window release chart says it is the right time to launch it at a high price. They talk about the millions they are losing, because they refuse to compete in the market and satisfy consumer demand.
They are stuck in the old days of making money at each tier of release, even as more and more people are moving away from that model. They pray that cord cutting is a fad that will not catch on, because then they might need to shift the model and actually compete as the releases might no longer be staggered and the consumer might see something else they will pay to watch instead.
Re: Re: Re:
You make a good point, I’d love for their defense to be “But if we release the films when people want to see them a la Mark Cuban, we’ll infringe a ridiculous patent filed despite prior art!”. Gotta love the US legal system.
Re: Re: Re: Re:
on Ars people were pointing out this was filed right around when the DVD/BR was coming out, so getting coverage might have been the reasoning.
Troll is as troll does.
Mike Masnick just hates it when copyright law is enforced.
How is what these people are attempting considered enforcing copyright? Cite specific examples for extra credit.
Re: Bad cop, no donut.
Re: Re: Bad cop, no donut.
‘The law has been distorted by private corruption.’
Close, but needed a little tweak, the public had nothing to do with how insane copyright law has gotten, it was all due to private companies buying new and more expansive laws and ‘fixes’.
average_joe just hates it when due process is enforced.
Dallas Buyers Club LLC Last Known Address probably some hotel room , in Dallas
Lol they used GeoIP.
If you got a letter, Google “maxmind submit correction” and change the location of your IP address.
The Squirt Locker…Dallas Boobies Club. Good ideas.
Dear Mr. Nicolas Chartier
Please explain how saying that suing thousands of people is a bad idea makes one a thief?