Apple Puts Dead Man's Switch About Not Receiving PATRIOT Act Requests In Its Transparency Report

from the well,-look-at-that... dept

It’s a bit late, but it appears that Apple has finally caught up with Google, Twitter, Microsoft, Facebook and Yahoo, as tech companies that have issued “transparency reports” about government requests for data (and, in some cases, for takedowns). The first Apple Transparency Report is pretty similar to the transparency reports issued by those other companies. As with the others, the US government only allows “ranges” of information to be released about certain kinds of reports, rather than exact numbers. And, of course, no companies are yet allowed to reveal the details of Section 702 orders — which are a part of the PRISM program. The various companies are suing the government over that one.

Some people have noted that Apple seems to get fewer requests than some other companies, but that doesn’t seem like an apples-to-apples comparison, since Apple’s main business is hardware, and its online services are much more limited and targeted than those other companies. But, there is one interesting tidbit in the report. Way down at the end it says the following:

Apple has never received an order under Section 215 of the USA Patriot Act. We would expect to challenge such an order if served on us.

Now, Section 215 of the PATRIOT Act is the so-called “business records” or “tangible things” clause, which is used to demand all the metadata from the various telcos (who appear to be happy to hand it over without complaint). There’s been no indication so far that the government has used 215 on the tech companies. PRISM all relates to Section 702 of the FAA, which the lawsuit mentioned above is about. And, of course, there are reports of the NSA using Executive Order 12333 to justify hacking into servers overseas, without companies even knowing about it. So, you can argue that whether or not any Section 215 orders were served on Apple is somewhat meaningless.

But… it appears that Apple has put this in the report as a sort of dead man’s switch, such as Cory Doctorow suggested a few months ago: for companies that have not received any such type of order, if they announce that publicly on a regular basis, if the next time they release a report it’s not in there, it becomes clear that they have received such an order, even if they’re gagged about it. This is also known as a warrant canary, and was originally suggested for libraries — who were afraid of Section 215 from the very beginning (early on, it was often referred to as the library clause), as people expected the feds to use it to spy on people’s library records.

While given the other programs this may not seem like a big deal, it’s nice to see Apple taking this particular step, even if small, to effectively protest against the 215 gag orders.

Filed Under: , , , , , ,
Companies: apple

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Apple Puts Dead Man's Switch About Not Receiving PATRIOT Act Requests In Its Transparency Report”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
out_of_the_blue says:

We've NO way of verifying any of this. Sheer PR.

And in any case, NONE of those mega-corporations are telling us how much they co-operate with NSA, it’s always carefully couched in terms of coercion, which itself implies a larger willing co-operation.

But Mike Romney thinks corporations are persons complete with rights and morals and can be trusted.

Joe Dirt says:

Re: We've NO way of verifying any of this. Sheer PR.

I think you might be mistaken concerning the issue about Corporations being people. The Supreme Court, since 1819, has held this view.

…and the actual encounter in Iowa, with Romney…

‘Romney explained that one way to fulfill promises on entitlement programs is to ?raise taxes on people,? but before he could articulate his position on not raising taxes, someone interrupted.
?Corporations!? a protester shouted, apparently urging Romney to raise taxes on corporations that have benefited from loopholes in the tax code. ?Corporations!?
?Corporations are people, my friend,? Romney said.
Some people in the front of the audience shouted, ?No, they?re not!?
?Of course they are,? Romney said. ?Everything corporations earn ultimately goes to people. Where do you think it goes??’

Please don’t make things worse by twisting the truth to meet your need to belittle people that have a different point of view. We have enough elected talking mouths that do this to us on a daily basis.

Anonymous Coward says:

It really isn’t much of a dead-man’s switch, since it will only be triggered if/when Apple feels like it.

The point of a dead-man’s switch is that it eliminates the need for operator intervention: it triggers whether you like it or not.

It is more like a flag that you rise or lower depending on the circumstances. Flag up, everything is fine. Flag down, trouble.

/end pedantic dick mode

That said, we have no way to confirm that Apple is actually telling the while truth. We’re just going to have to trust a mega-corporation to be honest. And we all know how that usually ends.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published.

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...