Was Level 3 The Weak Link That Gave The Feds A Way To Hack Into Google's Network?

from the no-comment dept

The NY Times has an interesting and informative story building on yesterday’s bombshell about the NSA and GCHQ infiltrating Google and Yahoo’s network links between datacenters. Much of the NYT report covers the same ground as the original Washington Post article, but adds a few key details. The key part? That the network cables that connect the various Google datacenters are apparently provided by telco infrastructure giant Level 3 — and when asked about it, Level 3 seemed to hint strongly that the government may have gotten access via it, but that it was legally gagged from talking about it:

In a statement, Level 3 said: “We comply with the laws in each country where we operate. In general, governments that seek assistance in law enforcement or security investigations prohibit disclosure of the assistance provided.”

That’s not a definite confirmation, but you can see how it would raise eyebrows. As the NYT report notes, in an earlier story, concerning claims that Level 3 had helped the intelligence community spy on Germans, the company had denied the report. The fact that it’s not denying it here, but rather pointing out that if it had helped there would be a gag order, certainly suggests the potential way in for the NSA. If so, Google might want to look rather closely at its agreement with Level 3.

Filed Under: , , , ,
Companies: google, level 3, yahoo

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Was Level 3 The Weak Link That Gave The Feds A Way To Hack Into Google's Network?”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
elemecca (profile) says:

Re: Gag Orders

But American citizens and entities are bound by them anywhere in the world. A fully independent part of Level 3 operating from a foreign country bound to its American parent only by contract obligations would be (mostly) immune from American court orders. Anything that’s legally part of the American company is within the jurisdiction of the American court system regardless of where in the world they operate.

out_of_the_blue says:

NO. Near certain was Brin, Schmidt, and what's-his-name.

All of them got billions making them now definitely corrupt, and I doubt started with too much of conscience to soothe, either.

This is just yet more of attempt to divert scandal away from the big co-conspirator corporations.

Edward Snowden: Google, Facebook, Microsoft, Yahoo, Apple, and the rest of our internet titans must ask themselves why they aren’t fighting for our interests the same way — Ed, those soul-less amoral entities care only about the billions they get BEING snoops!


out_of_the_blue (profile) says:

Re: NO. Near certain was Brin, Schmidt, and what's-his-name.

My god, the Big G still frightens me. It’s a mystery as to why a corporation that wants to data-mine my information merely to sell ads is far more frightening than government agencies who could use that same information to arrest me. Yes, the G is bad, but they’re not going to arrest me. The NSA, whom I only attack when Mike somehow fails to (don’t ask me what standard I’m using, Mike fails in my book just because…well…he’s MEGAPHONE MIKE!)

07:21:19[4e 4f 54 48 49 4e 47 20 49 20 53 41 59 20 49 53 20 4f 46 20 41 4e 59 20 53 55 42 53 54 41 4e 43 45 20 57 48 41 54 53 4f 45 56 45 52]

andrew_duane (profile) says:

Non-Denial Acknowledgement

It seems to me that the gag orders are self-defeating.

If you didn’t get asked for help: “No, we did not get a government request”
If you *did* get asked for help: “We can neither confirm nor deny that we got a government request”

You didn’t confirm or deny it or talk about it, but you said yes anyway.


GeneralEmergency (profile) says:

If I was negotiating a contract with a large network carrier...


If I was negotiating a contract with a large network carrier, I would specify as part of the contract that the carrier had to send a daily email to my security officer attesting to the fact that NO tap, pen register, or National Security Letter orders had been served upon their premises that would surveil my network traffic.

When the emails stop coming, I know I have a problem.


Clownius says:


Seems to me encryption is a must. Yeah they may be able to break it but at extreme costs. Make them pay for every bit of data.

As for not routing via the USA its an interesting theory but you need to add al 5 eyes nations at least. Its not terribly practical in the end because im sure the NSA would have no problem tapping other locations around the world…

I bet they already do.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...