CIA Warned About Snowden Trying To Get Into Computers He Wasn't Authorized On Back In 2009 [Update: Or Not]

from the checks-and-balances dept

Update: And, of course, now the NY Times is walking back this story as the CIA has directly denied it:

Asked repeatedly for comment over the past several weeks, most recently on Thursday, the C.I.A. declined. But on Friday, the C.I.A. responded with a statement, the first public acknowledgment that Mr. Snowden had worked for the agency.

“The C.I.A did not file any report on Snowden indicating that it suspected he was trying to break into classified computer files to which he did not have authorized access while he was employed at the C.I.A., nor was he returned home from an overseas assignment because of such concerns,” Todd Ebitz, an agency spokesman, said in the statement.

This contradicts what the NY Times had reported on Friday — and while it appears someone is not being particularly honest, we’ll take back the story as well. Original below — but crossed out.

The NY Times has an interesting report, claiming that investigators looking back through Ed Snowden’s history, discovered that he was written up back in 2009, while working for the CIA, in Geneva, for “trying to break into classified computer files to which he was not authorized to have access.” It was for this reason that he was sent home, and moved on to a new job, as a contractor for the NSA. The report notes that the writeup — known as a “derogatory report” — was considered somewhat minor, and wasn’t shared with folks at the NSA.

What’s interesting about this is that it at least suggests that Snowden has been considering all of this for quite a long time. Back in June, he had told Glenn Greenwald and Laura Poitras that his time in the CIA “disillusioned” him, and a colleague of his in Geneva apparently said recently that Snowden “was already experiencing a crisis of conscience of sorts” when she knew him back then. This seems interesting on a variety of levels, as it further highlights that Snowden didn’t take the decision he made to be a whistleblower lightly. Plus, he had a long time to think things through, which supports the claims that Barton Gellman recently made, concerning Snowden’s larger view of what he was doing.

Filed Under: , , , ,

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “CIA Warned About Snowden Trying To Get Into Computers He Wasn't Authorized On Back In 2009 [Update: Or Not]”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
Anonymous Coward says:


He got caught trying to access stuff he wasn’t permitted to any only got sent home?

They go on to say that only “major rule-based infractions” result in suspension of a clearance. If this isn’t one of those, I don’t know what is.

Really, if it’s serious enough to suspend somebody from their post over, it surely is serious enough to warrant revoking their clearance too.

I’m not bashing Snowden, I’m just puzzled about this story and how either the government is completely inept if this is how they operate or they’re grasping at straws to cover their asses by trying to make this story more of a failure of the system rather than their own incompetence.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Updated

why would you not fully believe

two senior American officials with direct knowledge of the episode who spoke on the condition of anonymity”

I mean that’s rock solid right !!!!!
IF you are caught or even suspected of being a security break or risk YOU DONT CONTINUE to work in that field !!!

Not even a “Senior GOVERMENT official” NO..

Senior AMERICAN Official, now what could that possibly include ?? The person in charge of the local post office ?

When you hear “Senior AMERICAN Officials” who want anonymity and you don’t start to ask questions Mr Masnick ?

Why not retract the headline as well Mr Masnick now you know it’s no true ?

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re:

what declassify information that does not exist!!
except in the minds of “two AMERICAN ‘officials’ !!!

They probably do not think it’s important, because they KNOW it’s not true, does not even make sense !!

People suspected of security breaches who have a clearance, LOSE THEIR clearance, they do not just go to work for another security company or department.

But let’s not let facts spoil a good story !!!

Even seen a business card that says for his title “Senior AMERICAN OFFICAL” ?

Does anyone here know what the term means ???

“Senior American official” ??

Yes, the CIA deal with information, REAL information, not just made up shit.

Again, this is about Snowden, what about the leaks, what of the leaks, are they continuing ? Why no debate about the leaks again ? It seems just more noise to cover any real story that might be ‘out there’ just a Google search away.

It heartening to see some other readers being critical and looking at real facts and questioning the truth as proclaimed here on TD.

It’s the risk you take if you are unwilling to write and research anything yourself, you leave that job up to reporters and writers, when you get your information from Google search you would expect to get crap.

Perhaps you need to find some of your own “Official American Officials” to dig up some tech dirt for you.. instead of being reliant on ‘real’ news and real reporters.

You either take the risk of being always wrong, or do your own research, this time you got burnt. But because of your method you can just blame your source on bad reporting, but I would have hoped you were a bit more savvy than that.

Again, quantity over quality, when you could have both!

FM Hilton (profile) says:

Liars all

Anything to damn the man who uncovered the most important bunch of leaks in quite a while.

The CIA and the NSA are micromanaging this story so badly…so maybe they should shut up. The NY Times played the patsy once too often for the government, it seems. Their role isn’t quite so angelic, is it?

Let the truth stand for itself: he is a hero, and there’s nothing anyone can do to change that, or what he did.

Anonymous Coward says:

Mike, you’ve insisted over and over that it’s effectively impossible to erase anything from the net, and people had better get used to it. We’re with you on that.

Yet now you come out and show us that it is possible to delete something in a convincing way — you simply use the typographical “strikeout” feature that has become become available in most font implementations in the last 10 years or so. You nearly contradict yourself thereby — but not quite.


Niall (profile) says:

Re: Re:

Excuse me, you’re talking bull. He’s not ‘erasing’ anything – not only is the article still there, but any Google-style archiving or text search would show the original article. However, anyone who looks at it will see it was incorrect – which is more than many so-called news organisations will do.

Besides, making the observation that information that has escaped into the internet wilds cannot be fully recaptured doesn’t mean you can’t remove stuff yourself – or shouldn’t.

Alternatively, if you were trying to be ironic and/or parody Out of the Blue, then sorry, your argument was too organised, logical and lacking in ad-homs.

Anonymous Coward says:


Cia, foia, glob, Olf society warrning for leading opossition of ethiopa and ethiopia. Oromo soul activist and activists. Top modern international intelegent spies and securties of oromo people. Olf soul activist. Olf must not organize with none oromo parties and oromo parties. Cleen decay of information. Unit nation. QuoetYourIreriToAndForOromoPeople.
Jesus Christ
Oromo Angels

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...