Just Weeks Ago, Keith Alexander Said Review Of NSA Found Not A Single Violation; Reality: Thousands Of Violations

from the lying-will-get-you-nowhere dept

It’s been clear that various defenders of the NSA program have been lying, but given yesterday’s revelations, now we can show just how much and how explicitly they were lying. It was just a couple weeks ago at the Black Hat conference that Keith Alexander told an audience that a review of NSA activities showed no violations at all:

Congress did a review of this program over a four-year period, the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence. And over that four-year period, they found no willful or knowledgeable violations of the law or the intent of the law in this program.

More specifically, they found no one at NSA had ever gone outside the boundaries of what we’ve been given. That’s the fact. What you’re hearing, what you’re seeing, what people are saying is, well, they could. The fact is they don’t. And if they did, our auditing tools would detect them, and they would be held accountable.

Note the hedge in the first paragraph, that they found “no willful or knowledgeable violations.” And, indeed, the Inspector General’s report revealed last night notes that most of the violations they found were accidental. But, the line between “accidental” and “intentional but covered up by claiming it was an accident” is a somewhat fuzzy line. If you’re an NSA analyst who wants to spy on someone, given how the agency treats “accidental” searches as no big deal, it appears that all you have to do is figure out a way to write a query that you can then claim accidentally, or “incidentally” just happened to collect the information you were looking for. “Oops.”

Either way, even with those caveats in the first paragraph, in the second paragraph Alexander makes claims without such caveats. There he argues that “no one at NSA had ever gone outside the boundaries of what we’ve been given. That’s a fact.” Actually, that’s a lie. As the report showed quite clearly, there are thousands of incidents in which they went outside the boundaries. That they were “accidental” or “incidental” doesn’t change that fact.

Filed Under: , , , ,

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Just Weeks Ago, Keith Alexander Said Review Of NSA Found Not A Single Violation; Reality: Thousands Of Violations”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
20 Comments
Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Rapid lying

Sorry, I’m responding to my own comment, but had a further thought.

If we can believe snowden when he said truth was coming, then we can expect countless “they’re were lying” articles. Sites like this where stories get “burried” as new ones come out gives certain characters incentive to get their names bumped down to page two. That could be good, as they compete not to have their names up front. I recant. my last post.

Anonymous Coward says:

Why is the director of the NSA quoting a Congressional review of the NSA to tell us what’s going on there. It’s like asking a kid how many cookies he stole from the cookie jar, and have him answer, “None, … as far as Dad knows.”

Perhaps his answer reveals that Congress wasn’t notified of these abuses. Or perhaps even worse, maybe when he says, “no one at NSA had ever gone outside the boundaries of what we?ve been given.”, he really indicating that there isn’t much in the way of boundaries.

Duke (profile) says:

Re: Re:

Why is the director of the NSA quoting a Congressional review of the NSA to tell us what’s going on there.

So he can say what he did without lying. He didn’t say that “no one at NSA had ever gone outside the boundaries” he said that “[Congress] found no one had ever gone outside the boundaries”, which is a completely different statement.

The latest report that exposed all of these violations was an internal NSA report, rather than the Congressional one. The latter somehow missed all of these abuses, demonstrating how meaningless their system of congressional oversight is.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re: Re:

So what your saying is that the NSA did an internal report and found tons of violations that they purposely withheld from Congress so that the violations wouldn’t show up in the Congressional one and then instead of referring to what they actually knew from their own investigation when speaking to the public, they parrot the Congressional report that they knew was inaccurate because of the withheld information. Yeah, that’s makes technically not lying SO much better.

Anonymous Coward says:

Other than taking their words for future record checks, why is anyone paying any attention to what these two with a vested interest in coverup and lying are saying? When does enough records showing they are activity lying with the knowledge that they are doing such become enough?

It has already been established that these two can simply not be believed along with their boss, Obama. None of them have any intention now or in the future of ever telling the truth. All three have had their creditability run through the mud by the lies they have been caught in to date. At this point there should be a statement added as a comment to every public proclamation they make that these are known twisters of the truth and can never be believed.

The eventual outcome of straightening this out will at this stage require an outside independent investigator designated by congress. Already too many inconsistencies showing the real intents of these three are on record for all to see. Enough of the fancy footwork that makes a stumble bum look like a ballerina in comparison.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re:

“When does enough records showing they are activity lying with the knowledge that they are doing such become enough?”

I’ll answer that. When the evidence builds to the point that it outrages enough people that public demands that they be arrested and held accountable for their actions. Then and only then will it be enough.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published.

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Loading...