DOJ Agrees To Release Redacted Court Ruling About How NSA Practices Violated The 4th Amendment

from the transparency! dept

You may recall that last year it was revealed that the FISA court (FISC) had determined that certain searches by the NSA under the section 702 program of the FISA Amendments Act were unconstitutional under the 4th Amendment. As we noted just this morning, it appears that the NSA’s justification for spying on Americans is related to this ruling. Ever since that secret ruling was announced, the EFF has been asking the government for a copy of it, via the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) process. The DOJ has fought very very hard against releasing this ruling, claiming that it would put us all in danger:

The government has determined that disclosure of the information withheld from Plaintiff could result in exceptionally grave and serious damage to the national security. Plaintiff obviously cannot contend otherwise. The Court accordingly should defer to the government’s determination in this case, uphold the Department’s withholdings, and grant this motion.

Except, today, during President Obama’s press conference, the DOJ suddenly (magically!) changed its position and filed a motion with the court saying that it will no longer fight this, but instead will release a redacted version of the FISC ruling later this month, claiming that recent declassifications by the federal government mean this is now acceptable.

Defendant further provides notice to the Court and Plaintiff that it has determined it will release to Plaintiff a redacted version of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (“FISC”) opinion previously withheld in full pursuant to FOIA exemptions (b)(1) and (b)(3), and a redacted version of the one responsive paragraph in the classified white paper to Congress also previously withheld in full pursuant to those exemptions. The information to be released to Plaintiff will consist of segregable information that the government has declassified and thus is no longer exempt under (b)(1) and (b)(3).

The filing also requests a bit more time to handle all of this, but it appears that revealing at least a little bit of info from this key ruling will no longer kill us all. And now we wait to see just how much is actually revealed… and how much is redacted.

Filed Under: , , , , , ,
Companies: eff

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “DOJ Agrees To Release Redacted Court Ruling About How NSA Practices Violated The 4th Amendment”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
Anonymous Coward says:

The Courts findings are as follows:

█████████████████████████ We find ███████████████████
this ████████████ program ████████████████ ████████████████
███████████████ █████████████ █████████████ does ███████
███████ not ██████████████ violate ████████████ ███████████
████████████ ███████████ the █████████████ ██████████████
4th amendment. ██████████████████ █████████████

See!, We told you so!

Anonymous Coward says:

i can see the document now:

Dear EFF,
Redacted, ——————————————

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re:

First, we consider the source and its definition of ‘transparency,’ which doesn’t match with the English language.

Second, what the government says it will do, and what it really does do, are historically not in agreement. We will wait to see the follow-through, but we aren’t going to hold our breath.

Stop being a whiny bitch about people exercising their rights and discussing their disgust with the actions of the government.

Beech says:

Here’s the biggest problem:

“Plaintiff obviously cannot contend otherwise.”

Holy hell. “We made this secret. It is secret because we say so. There is a very good reason for it to be secret, but that reason is also secret. Everyone should just shut up and trust us, even though you have no reason to. There is no way to prove that anything we are doing is untrustworthy, because we have made all such proof secret.”

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...