Florida 'Abbott And Costello' Prenda Case Ends Not With A Bang, But A Whimper

from the that's-too-bad dept

As expected, it looks like Prenda, along with John Steele and Paul Duffy, have a tiny bit of good news as the first case which suggested they were committing fraud on the court, in the courtroom of Judge Mary Scriven, has been closed without any further action. If you don’t recall, this was the case in which the transcript was something of an Abbott and Costello worthy routine, with various lawyers trying desperately to back out of representing Sunlust, a Prenda client. You really need to read the whole transcript, but among other things, Paul Duffy claimed Prenda had nothing to do with the case, while the lawyer seeking to get out of the case said he was hired by Prenda. Mark Lutz makes an appearance in which he’s dressed down by the judge for dressing down in the courtroom and being a sham of a “corporate representative.” And then there’s the appearance of John Steele, who claims he’s there on no official business other than to observe, but who repeatedly confers with Lutz, and who the judge quickly figures out likely has his hands in this whole mess.

Unfortunately, some sort of settlement was clearly reached, as the defendant Tuan Nguyen, represented by Graham Syfert (who has battled against Prenda on numerous fronts), recently withdrew all motions against Prenda, Steele and Duffy, so the court agreed to close the case without further investigation into the potential fraud on the court. Of course, in a bit of irony, the final order of business before closing the case is to… let another set of lawyers off the case, after they claimed conflict of interest among their clients (mainly because Brett Gibbs had filed a declaration implicating Steele, and they were representing both). It’s a bit unfortunate that this case is closing, as it seemed like another one where a judge might suss out some clear examples of fraud on the court by Prenda (denying they were involved at all in this case is a big one, for example…). But, this case is now off the docket entirely. Hopefully Nguyen is cashing a nice settlement check from Steele, Hansmeier and Duffy.

Filed Under: , , ,
Companies: prenda, prenda law, sunlust

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Florida 'Abbott And Costello' Prenda Case Ends Not With A Bang, But A Whimper”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
32 Comments
Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re: Re:

I’m not allowed to have an opinion unless I’m your editor? LOL! Great comeback, Mike. Haven’t seen that one in a while. But you’ve definitely played that card once or twice. You need new material. Why not nut up and discuss something that matters on the merits without running away. I fucking dare you. Doesn’t this mindless shit get old? Be a man! You can do it!

Julian Perez (user link) says:

Re: Re: Re

Are you sure that’s John Steele?

If it is –

You forked over an awful lot of your dwindling cash to make that suit “go away.” But there will be others. You’ll be in prison and broke anytime now; all it needs is one to stick and there are plenty coming.

You’re the kind of loathesome scum that gives the entire legal profession a bad reputation.

I see you kept your mouth shut during the Wright hearings when you got what was coming. My favorite part of the 9th Circuit hearings? You demanded an appeal, only to bounce it back to Wright, who gave you further sanctions.

You’re going to jail.

You’re going to be broke.

And you’ll deserve every bit of it, because of the lives you ruined by the industrial quantity in your extortion scheme.

Pragmatic says:

Re: Re: Re:2 Re

I haven’t had enough contact with him to know if you’re right but if the identifiers are there, you probably are.

Don’t they just hate it when the chickens come home to roost? Well that’s what they get for extortion. I’ve got no sympathy for them.

I’m amused that his shill apologists keep popping up to tell us to give it a rest. Try to imagine what TD would look like if they ran it. Actually, you don’t have to. I’ve already outed OOTB1 and trust me, her blog is all pro-maximalist whining and conspiracy theories involving imaginary commies coming to get us, or something.

I prefer Techdirt because Mike and the other contributors can put together a coherent argument and keep their stories straight.

That One Guy (profile) says:

Strange, I wasn’t aware the three stooges had accounts here, team prenda must be pretty desperate to make sure this particular case goes away as completely, and quietly as possible.

Anyway, regarding the article, as sad as I am that he dropped it, given how desperate prenda has got to be getting, I can only imagine they signed over quite the hefty check to get him to go away; funny when you consider how those extortionists are so used to it happening the other way around.

Edward Teach says:

Judges Love The Legal Profession

Mates, this be no real surprise. ‘Tis well-known that Judges will rule so as to favor the Legal “Profession” as often as they can. Despite Steele, Duffy, Hansmeier and Lutz looking like soft, freshwater swabs, the Judge won’t sanction them until they’ve besmirched the Legal Profession itself.

Arrr! What a lot of ectoplasms!

That One Guy (profile) says:

Re: Trolls

Not hardly, the trolls on the prenda articles are just another measure of humor dealing with an already funny debacle.

The articles about prenda flailing around in desperation to avoid jail time: comedy gold.

Watching the trolls scramble like mad to get people to stop noticing said flailing by prenda: icing on the cake, or the second act to a world class comedy show.

Julian Perez (user link) says:

Not enough, but more is coming

Someone above said how ironic it is John Steele and the gang made a hefty settlement to make a lawsuit go away. That IS rich.

If anyone out there does not believe John Steele’s fate is anything less than totally deserved, I encourage you to read the ultimate douchebro tweets he made, the height of crass arrogance.

At one point, these guys were in so much trouble I felt sorry for them. Reading these tweets fixed me of that.

BittorrentBull 1-10-13

BitTorrentBull 1-09-13

No one’s fate is more deserved than these loathesome scumbags.

I hope to see them broke, penniless or in prison for the innocent lives they ruined, their Minnesota homes confiscated, their reputations sullied forever as criminals running an extortion scheme.

Anon E. Mous (profile) says:

Prenda really had no choice but to settle with Syfert & Nguyen after the lawyer Prenda hired wanted the hell out of that case.

Once the Judge informed everyone of that letter Duffy sent that Prenda had nothing to do with this and the Judge quizzed the attorney hired by Prenda and it was revealed that Gibbs on behalf of Prenda hired him, the jig was up.

Then that brilliant Q & A with Mark Lutz and the Judge where Lutz didn’t know this or that and Steele desperately seeing Lutz falter and trying to tell him to say he was a 1099 contractor to the Judge to save Prenda and Lutz was all but comical.

And then Steele so desperate to save the Sunlust case gets himself noticed by the Judge and panics when the Judge asked him who he was, and Steele the bumbling fool cant get it out fast enough that he doesn’t have anything to do with this case (now where have we heard that line before) and he wasn’t licenced to practice in florida and is now retired.

The fact that Syfert let the Lawyer Prenda picked up for this case what and who he was dealing with, was more than enough that the other Lawyer Prenda hired wanted nothing to do with the case.

Duffy’s brilliant letter to the court informing it that Prenda had nothing to do with the case was the start of the Judge getting suspicious.

Then Lutz trying to represent himself as being a representive of Sunlust (now where have we heard of Lutz trying to be a represenitive of a entity before)

The fact that Lutz also said that he appeared around the country as a 1099 contractor for various Prenda cases is on the record, and would have been used in the sanctions against Prenda.

Steele who’s famous “I don’t know anything about any of these cases, first I have heard of them” was dumb enough to try and pull Lutz ass our of the fire when the Judge was quizzing them and then gets caught by the Judge feeding Lutz an answer.

Syfert wisely pointed out the Stelle, Lutz, Prenda connection, and the Judge obviously picked up from their what a bunch of B.S. Prenda was feeding the court.

They had to settle this out, as damning as Judge Wrights ruling was this one would have been just as bad if sanctions were handed down.

Steele I am sure was on the Phone with Duffy begging him to settle this out, so they didn’t get slammed by this Judge.

Syfert and Nyugen won this hands down all due to Prenda, Duffy and Steele’s incompetence it would seem in my opinion.

The letter informing the court that Prenda had nothing to do with the case was the first nail in the coffin. Lutz’s brilliant answers were the next nail.

Steele panicking and seeing Lutz flaling and drowning and piping up from the gallery to Lutz “say your a 1099 contractor”, “say your a 1099 contractor” and then getting noticed by the Judge (nice one John, all you needed was a red nose and some red floppy shoes to go along with the show)was the next nail.

The final nail in the coffin was Syfert bringing up the connection with Prenda, Steele and Lutz that was it for them.

The Prenda gang could in no way have another case where the lawyers might get referred to the bar (yeah again) and get sanction by the coutrt and the Judge making that available to other courts, the damage would have been fatal.

I am sure the facts of this case will be noted in others, however I still cant wait for the 9th Circuit Court to hear the Appeal of Judge Wrights sanctions, that should be most entertaining.

I see someone’s bruised ego is hear posting as Nora, gee I sure hope they aren’t playing dress up as Nora as well.

Maybe that is why the wife wanted a divorce, didn’t like it when they wore her garments around, course that’s hypothetical, but might make some sense considering someone picked BitTorrentBetty as a username on twitter and Nora here…always a womans name.. wonder why.

Andrew D. Todd (user link) says:

Everyone Now Knows About Prenda Law.

Here’s an article in Business Week. Nothing new to Techdirt readers, of course, but a very fair summation in a national general-interest magazine.

Claire Suddath, Prenda Law, the Porn Copyright Trolls, Business Week, May 30, 2013

http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2013-05-30/prenda-law-the-porn-copyright-trolls#r=read

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published.

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Loading...