Angry Judge Tells Prenda To Stop Falsifying Alan Cooper's Signature; Calls It Fraud

from the another-failure dept

Looks like Prenda continues to have problems in court. In the lawsuit in Minnesota that Alan Cooper brought against Prenda and John Steele for fraudulent use of his name, it appears that Judge Ann Alton made fairly quick work of getting the whole thing off of her docket. Someone going by the twitter handle “J.P. Baggins” was in attendance, and says that the judge ordered Prenda to stop using Alan Cooper’s name and brought the case to a close. There won’t be any damages awarded, but it seems clear that the judge was not at all happy with Prenda. She referred to Paul Hansmeier, appearing for Prenda Law, as acting in a way that is “not appropriate for an attorney” while also claiming that what they had done was “fraud, pure and simple.” She also told him that she believed him “to be in violation of a whole lot of rules” and she’ll be reporting him to the lawyer’s board (just one more to pile on, I guess).

Another person in the courtroom, Matthew Sparby noted that the judge was a bit confused at the beginning, apparently misreading Judge Otis Wright’s infamous order to also implicate Cooper as well, and while that was eventually cleared up by Cooper’s lawyer, Paul Godfread, Sparby thinks that may be why no damages were awarded.

She apparently also closed by telling Hansmeier to “never EVER send” fraudulent letters “EVER again” and noted that she was “offended this case is here” before abruptly ending the whole thing. Seems like another bad day for Prenda.

Filed Under: , , , , , , ,
Companies: af holdings, ingenuity 13, prenda, prenda law

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Angry Judge Tells Prenda To Stop Falsifying Alan Cooper's Signature; Calls It Fraud”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
58 Comments
DannyB (profile) says:

Re: Re:

It is unfair that judges are so biased against perpetrating multiple simultaneous frauds upon the court while using the court as a tool in an extortion shakedown.

This bias on the part of the judges is brazenly obvious.

This bias is unfair to the plaintiff/lawyers (who are one and the same party although separated by a tangled web of paper shell companies). This bias prevents the plaintiff from pursuing the much needed mailing list of identities for sending out threatening extortion letters.

ricebowl (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re:

Honestly, I would’ve thought that financial sanctions would be appropriate, whether punitive or restorative, at this venue, to be followed by other sanctions, such as those you identify.

I’m a resident of the UK, though, so I’m perhaps misunderstanding some of the finer points of US law (as I also mistake the laws of my own country, being not-a-lawyer, and such).

Dark Moe (profile) says:

Cooper vs Steele

What bothers me is the door being closed on the damages. So the judge told them not to send out any fraudulent letters, ever again – so what? Fraud is determined in Prenda’s mind, not ours. They do what they want to do, until they are told otherwise.

And just because a judge told them not to EVER send out fraudulent letters again, Hansmeier will laugh at it and say, “Fraudulent according to whom?”

Wright’s Denial of the Sanctions Stay in CACD helped a little, but not much.

That One Guy (profile) says:

Re: Cooper vs Steele

Well, yes and no. Yes this time Prenda got off with basically a slap on the wrist, but given how angry the judge seems to be with what they were doing, I imagine if any of them ever show up in her courtroom in the future, they’ll be lucky to get away with skin intact.

That said I do agree with you, they were insanely lucky this time around, and they really should have been hit much harder than this for what they were being accused of doing.

DannyB (profile) says:

Re: Cooper vs Steele

so what? Fraud is determined in Prenda’s mind, not ours.
Hansmeier will laugh at it and say, “Fraudulent according to whom?”

I suspect there is some objective standard of fraud. I suspect the judge expects Prenda to know this and what that standard is. I suspect if they demonstrate a lack of knowledge again, she will educate them.

That Anonymous Coward (profile) says:

Wow… This Judge baffles me.
After they stole Cooper’s identity, used it in copyright transfers in what was found by a court to be fraudulent activity, and the defamation suits to shut up Mr. Cooper and his lawyer… she told them no dessert and go to your room.

Anyone still wonder why Pretenda was able to operate for so long (and is still running even with the finding of facts by Judge Wright?).

DannyB (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re: Re:

This probably demonstrated just how busy judges must really be. That judge Otis Wright has spent as much time as he did to throw a monkey wrench into the Prenda machinery demonstrates his commitment to bring justice to these fruadsters — while letting other government agencies spend their time and resources doing a through investigation and prosecution.

That Anonymous Coward (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re:

Mr. Cooper was NOT a party to the case in Judge Wrights courtroom. He was a 3rd party asked to appear and offer testimony. He or his lawyer are not being paid for those appearances.

In the MN case, Cooper filed alleging they stole his identity and to hold them accountable for that. As the Prenda train derails someone would have attempted to sue Alan Cooper who signed the copyright transfers for the shell company and Mr. Cooper would have been left holding the bag for a company he knew nothing about.

She literally did NOTHING to help Mr. Cooper, because she failed to read and understand Judge Wrights order and predecided that Cooper was a bad guy like the other people.

Anon E. Mous (profile) says:

Bwahahahahaha….Another slame for Team Prenda.

While I am amazed that no damages were awarded, I doubt this is the end of the Alan Cooper case, I believe that Cooper will launch an appeal to clear his name and to have the court find that his name and idenitity were mis-appreopriated in regard to forged signatures on court documents and that he was made CEO of two holding companies he had no knowledge of.

Also I am sure that Cooper would like to see John Steele and Prenda brought to justice for their roles in the misappropriation of his identity.

The fact I think that the Judge didn’t delve to much int the depth of what was really going on and her confusion at the beginning, I believe sets this up for an appeal.

I am sure Cooper is going to want some vindication and some monetary compensation for the mis-use of his name and identity By Prenda et all.

The fact that Hansmeier took it while bent over from the Judge leads me to believe that he will also appeal due to the fact that the Judge said she would be forwarding the matter to the Minnesota State Bar.

This would now make 2 different cases were Hansmeier alone has been told the State Bar would be getting the case details and his actions have been called into question.

Prenda and those who are involved in it have now been subject to investigations of various State Bars, State and Federal Attorney General and the Criminal Division of the IRS.

Now Team Prenda is not done yet, they still have to explain why someone signed documents as Salt Marsh to Judge Chen in the SF court case…good luck with that, I think we will see the sanctions train make another stop at Team Prenda.

Has anyone noticed that A lot of Team Prenda has been hit with sanctions and state bar referrals, except that is for John “Teflon John” Steele.

I have to wonder if John really retired, or if his retirement was forced upon him. It seems rather odd that everyone else connected with Prenda is getting it in the ass (so to speak)

Think about it. Duffy has been referred to the state of California Bar and the Illinois State Bar.

Gibbs has been referred state of California Bar.

Hansmeier has been reffered to the Minnesota State Bar.

The only one to escape that is Steele. Now either John is smarter than we think or maybe John retired to avoid the very troubles his Prenda Team mates are about to have.

I really wonder if John retired or his licensce was going to be pulled and maybe he cut a deal to avoid loss of his license, that would make some sense if you think about it.

Now does anyone here really believe John is retired, I doubt it. If you think about, why would John Steele who is retired, show up in court for the Sunlust pictures case and when the Judge asked who he was, John basically lept up and stated “My name is John Steele, and I am not a practicing lawyer and am not admitted to the Florida State bar and have nothing to do with this case”

But yet there John was, coincidence, I doubt it…It’s my opinion that John is still playing lawyer behind the scene but trying to pass it off as consulting, but really I think Stelle, Duffy and Hansmeier run all the litigation and write most of the filings themselves, sans Brent Gibbs of course who I think is dumb enough to do his own.

I wonder how Hansmeier, Duffy & Gibbs feel about their legal careers taking a vicious beating by the courts and their professional careers in jeopardy while Steel walk virtually unscathed.

It will be interesting to see what happens if the main players in Team Prenda get hit with RICO, I wonder who will be the first to save their skin and turn professional witness for the prosecution… and I would suffice to say that Steele will be the one to find out after the music stops their wont be a chair for him to sit in.

sophisticatedjanedoe says:

Re: Re:

Don’t forget about two federal Prenda v. the Internets cases: there are counterclaims pending, and they can be a vehicle for Copper’s vindication. Even more, Godfread’s work was not disappeared in vain: GoDaddy’s subpoena alone has a hell of a value (which contains the evidence of Steele’s involvement he bragged no one has — in the interview to Ars).

Anon E. Mous (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re:

I haven’t forgot about it, and if I recall wright Steele still is trying to sue Cooper in the Minnesota case isn’t he?

I don’t think we have seen the last of this yet, I would have to believe that Godfread & Cooper will appeal being with the confusion with Judge Wrights motion causing the Judge to be a little befuddled with the aspects of the case.

I would think Godfread will want to clear Coopers name and get him some monetary compensation for the mis-use and mis-appropriation of Coopers identity.

So I agree that Godread work isn’t in vain and I don’t think that Team Prenda and especially John “Teflon John” Steele has escaped Godfread’s legal acumen as of yet

Heather says:

Re: Re: Re:

Dont bet on it Erin. Get a ghost writer who (a) can express a thought without citing case law linked to the magna charta and (b) is not so distrespectful of “flyover” land west of his shitty studio in Dorchester. The judges here tend to be from here. And douchebags don’t fare well in Chicago

DannyB (profile) says:

Re: Re:

A bad day for John Steele is when is isn’t getting $10,000 per day, which he had stated was his goal.

A bad day for Prenda is having yet another court that has some sort of bias against lawyers committing fraud and other criminal acts upon and by use of the courts. This is one less court that you can use in your extortion scheme. Even worse, because choice of judges in a court may be random, if you file in that court, you may once again get the judge who has the bias against fraud.

A bad day for Prenda lawyers is getting yet another bad referral to one or more bars.

Nora says:

Cooper

Are you really that much of a loser, or are you too stupid to know that your man cooper’s suit got tossed in exchange for nothing. Nobody can be as fucking stupid as whoever wrote your account suggests. So I suppose you assume that your “readers” (can they read?) are stupider than you. That is a difficult task. Who is the shortest midget.

Nora says:

Anon E Mouse

Anon – I enjoy how you spell like a poorly-educated third grade girl. And how you can not organize your thoughts into a coherent sentence. Stay safe my friend – remember, Algernon only got smart for a short time and then died. Stay stupid my firend. Live long and stay a dunce. And keep beating off to porn you didn’t pay for.

That Anonymous Coward (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re:

it’s actually hard to tell.
The lack of bragging about how they are just misunderstood might remove Steele from the list of possibilities.
It might be Duffys wife, who would be much better served by getting out of her little ivory tower and see the scum she has been sleeping next to for what he truly is, and start asking another lawyer if her ass might end up in the sling too.

If it was posted via Mulvad or FL it would most likely be Steele.

There is also the outside chance it was posted using a DoD network or a GA IP and it would be the ‘we’re not criminals because gay marriage!’ lunatic.

Anon E. Mous (profile) says:

John -er- I mean Nora, are you trolling again. Looks like having to settle with Nyugen to keep from getting sanction in that case has made you a tad upset.

Maybe Nora is just worried that Steele is going to take the big fall, since it’s Gibbs, Duffy and Hansmeier who are all referred to their various State Bars and could have a variety of things happen with their licence to practice law while Steele escapes that happening to him.

Could be Nora is a little worried that Gibbs, Duffy, Hansmeier or Lutz could always turn into a witness of a RICO case came down.

Obviously Nora is worried that the others could strike a deal and maybe extract a little revenge for their careers being in tatters while Steele escaped without any penalties from the State Bar(s) he belongs to.

Must weigh on Nora’s mind a lot that there is the possibility that with a possible RICO case, someone from the group could flip, with the IRS Criminal Division case someone could flip.

Of course this is Hypothetical for now, but we’ll have to see what happens.

John -er- I mean Nora, you seem to know a lot of graphic details of what goes on in various porn acts, you must watch a lot of it

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published.

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop ยป

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Loading...