Learning From Aaron Swartz: Content Must Not Be The End Game For Knowledge

from the serious-stuff dept

In the wake of the suicide of Aaron Swartz, there have been many fine tributes to the man and his work. Another growing class of posts that have flowed from this unhappy event are people reflecting on the important lessons he taught them. Here, for instance, is Jeff Jarvis recounting his journey from a fairly traditional position on copyright to one that recognized how the Internet had reshaped that landscape.

Ten years ago, Jarvis appended this “mock copyright notice” to his blog posts:

It’s mine, I tell you, mine! All mine! You can’t have it because it’s mine! You can read it (please); you can quote it (thanks); but I still own it because its mine! I own it and you don’t. Nya-nya-nya. So there. COPYRIGHT … by Jeff Jarvis.

But gradually, under the influence of key thinkers in this area, he came to see things differently:

Lessig and company have taught me that content’s value can lie in what it spawns and inspires. Locked away, unseen, unused, not discussed, not linked, it might as well not exist.

And Aaron Swartz has taught me that content must not be the end game for knowledge. Why does knowledge become an article in a journal — or that which fills a book or a publication — except for people to use it? And only when they use it does content become the tool it should be. Not using knowledge is an offense to it. If it cannot fly free beyond the confines of content, knowledge cannot reach its full value through collaboration, correction, inspiration, and use.

The tension between knowledge and content is no mere abstraction. As well as lying behind some of the most problematic sections of SOPA, ACTA and TPP, and the larger war on digital sharing they are part of, it was almost certainly a contributory factor in the death of Aaron Swartz too.

Follow me @glynmoody on Twitter or identi.ca, and on Google+

Filed Under: , , , ,

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Learning From Aaron Swartz: Content Must Not Be The End Game For Knowledge”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
10 Comments
Ninja (profile) says:

Why does knowledge become an article in a journal — or that which fills a book or a publication — except for people to use it? And only when they use it does content become the tool it should be.

Now that’s freaking insightful. Whatever is made of copyright it should be mandatory to MAKE THE CONTENT EASILY AND WIDELY available in order to retain the copyrights.

Yeah, this should save movies, music and whatever from gathering dust, rust and rotting in some basement.

erichwwk (profile) says:

Who was stealing from whom?

“‎”The law locks up the man or woman who steals the goose from the commons, but lets the greater villain loose that steals the commons from the goose”

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L7jaSjkd0jM

also try Gar Alperovitz and Lew Daley on most wealth (esp knowledge) as common property

http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/283236-1

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published.

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Loading...