RIM Loses Another Patent Case, Told To Pay $147.2 Million

from the live-by-the-patent,-die-by-the-patent dept

Perhaps one of the most famous patent lawsuits — which really highlighted the whole patent troll problem — was the case of NTP vs. RIM, which ended with RIM paying over $600 million to settle the case, even as the USPTO was rejecting NTP’s patents. Since then, RIM has been involved in a number of other patent lawsuits as well, including one that it lost last week against “Mformation Technologies.” RIM has been told to pay up another $147.2 million in this case.

Of course, what some people forget is that RIM brought much of this on itself. Before NTP even came on the scene, it was RIM who started suing a bunch of other companies for patent infringement, based on its broad portfolio of patents around wireless email and mobile devices. On top of all that, RIM’s business is collapsing. The company is fighting for relevancy as its latest operating system has been delayed — and there’s growing evidence that even once it comes out, no one’s going to care about it.

RIM can try to put a nice spin on things, but it seems clear that the company is in serious trouble. Perhaps, next time, it will focus on improving its products more than getting caught up in the patent game. Yes, many of these more recent lawsuits came from it getting sued, but there’s no doubt that RIM drew a lot of attention to itself early on with its own patent lawsuits against others.

Filed Under: ,
Companies: mformation technologies, ntp, rim

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “RIM Loses Another Patent Case, Told To Pay $147.2 Million”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
DataShade (profile) says:

Re: Re:

In case it wasn’t obvious: that was sarcasm. This site has hosted a thousand articles that showed people and companies who didn’t deserve it finding themselves the target of a patent troll.

It is certainly true that “there’s no doubt that RIM drew a lot of attention to itself early on with its own patent lawsuits against others,” but it does not logically follow that they were sued by trolls because they trolled others. I think that sort of thing is beneath you, Mr. Masnick.

That Anonymous Coward (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re:

But could their actions of suing over and over lead to people seeing it as a viable way to do business?

As Mike noted back in 2002…
“It is early days in the wireless data market so such legal battles should come as no surprise. But maybe RIM should consider finding a way to settle quickly and license their patents to infringers. The market is big enough to support all the current players and in fact needs as many players as possible to take off.”

And look at the landscape we have now, companies using patents of questionable value to block competitors products, or forcing them to be made less useful.

The answer seems to always be sue early, sue often, and gobble up any patents you can to create a wedge you can attack competitors with rather than compete. Much of the patent wars we are having to deal with now are over tiny little pieces of an overall picture that aren’t going to sway end users if you build a better machine.
Is slide to unlock really worth millions? Or is it just a way to make sure the other guy is blocked from the market, killing innovation and hurting the overall market as more money is spent on legal fees than development.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re: Re: Re:

The answer seems to always be sue early, sue often, and gobble up any patents you can to create a wedge you can attack competitors with rather than compete.

I think the issue is that that is what competition is now. If you don’t have nukes, you can’t win the arms race.

That Anonymous Coward (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re:2 Re:

Which is really freaking sad when you think about it.
Rather than spending money making sure it works correctly out of the box, or has a neat new feature they devote more money to making sure the other guy can’t have something remotely similar.

Competition used to be about making the better widget, now its about spending the most money on lawyers.

Anonymous Coward of Esteemed Trolling (profile) says:

“Rim’s new OS = Shit no one cares about.” (lol Mike)

As far as phones go….
Low wattage intel x86 chip, with Linux or Windows, is the shit that will get people caring.
But these patents are ridiculous.
If you told me they were a conspiracy, created to pay less tax, I would believe it. It’s not like the patents make more sense as is.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re:

In the construction industry it is standard to have one company that bids at or below cost to get the contract and then have parallel companies drain all the profit from the bidding company by having the bidding company purchase all material from a material supply company, rent all all equipment from a equipment company, purchase all labor from a labor supply company company, and have all management done by a management supply company. Each year the bid company shows a loss on each project; never making a profit.

The practice is so wide spread and bizarre to individuals not schooled in construction project matters and legal issues that it is beyond comprehension.

Since the practice is wide spread with firms outside the US as well as with US firms and that most of these firms are privately owned one can only conclude that there are some wide spread tax issues that are avoided since the ownership of the support firms is in most cases identical to the ownership of the biding firm.

With corporate structure in the construction and ship transportation industries as bizarre as Hollywood entertainment’s structure maybe the real issue is not pattens, copy right, licensing, but something more fundamental such as government tax policy and corporate legal liability. Maybe the pattens and copyright issues are only the visual part of a much bigger corporate finance and ethics issue.

Seamus Waldron (profile) says:

I feel bad now....

….. a few years ago I was contacted by RIM layers about – I think – this case. They were trying to prove prior art by showing that a business mobile device, the IBM PC110 (that has a built in telephone though traditional, not wireless) , would be automatically synced and updated using Lotus Notes.

Back in the day, the mid 90’s, I used this little beauty whilst I was travelling all over the world (http://www.apj.co.uk/pc110/pt_travel.htm). I was given it by my then employer as he preferred the Libretto. When I was given the PC110, it had on it Windows95 with Lotus Notes on the removable hard drive.

I spent the best part of 7 months – on and off – going through rafts of backups to find the Notes installation, but failed. Shame as it would definitely have demonstrated what RIM were trying to show.

Ninja (profile) says:

RIM is an incredibly interesting case study (along with Nokia) of dominant companies that fall into oblivion over the course of very few years. Google has some nice role in their late decline by throwing the Android nuke on the market. Even Apple who initially started eating those two now fear Android. And amusingly they are following the same path that has proven disastrous for RIM.

Interesting times we are living, interesting times.

staff says:

another biased article

?Patent troll?

Call it what you will…patent hoarder, patent troll, non-practicing entity, shell company, etc. It all means one thing: ?we?re using your invention and we?re not going to pay or stop?. This is just dissembling by large infringers and their paid puppets to kill any inventor support system. It is purely about legalizing theft. The fact is, many of the large multinationals who defame inventors in this way themselves make no products in the US or create any American jobs and it is their continued blatant theft which makes it impossible for the true creators to do so.

Prior to eBay v Mercexchange, small entities had a viable chance at commercializing their inventions. If the defendant was found guilty, an injunction was most always issued. Then the inventor small entity could enjoy the exclusive use of his invention in commercializing it. Unfortunately, injunctions are often no longer available to small entity inventors because of the Supreme Court decision so we have no fair chance to compete with much larger entities who are now free to use our inventions. Essentially, large infringers now have your gun and all the bullets. Worse yet, inability to commercialize means those same small entities will not be hiring new employees to roll out their products and services. And now some of those same parties who killed injunctions for small entities and thus blocked their chance at commercializing now complain that small entity inventors are not commercializing. They created the problem and now they want to blame small entities for it. What dissembling! If you don?t like this state of affairs (your unemployment is running out), tell your Congress member. Then maybe we can get some sense back in the patent system with injunctions fully enforceable on all infringers by all inventors, large and small.

Those wishing to help fight big business giveaways should contact us as below and join the fight as we are building a network of inventors and other stakeholders to lobby Congress to restore property rights for all patent owners -large and small.

For the truth about trolls, please see http://truereform.piausa.org/default.html#pt.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Older Stuff
09:00 Awesome Stuff: Monitor Everything (5)
09:00 Awesome Stuff: Cool Components (1)
12:42 Tech Companies Ask European Commission Not To Wreck The Internet -- And You Can Too (4)
09:00 Awesome Stuff: Play & Listen (1)
09:00 Awesome Stuff: Beyond Chiptunes (12)
09:00 Awesome Stuff: Updated Classics (3)
09:00 Awesome Stuff: Celebrating Cities (1)
09:00 Awesome Stuff: Crafts Of All Kinds (5)
09:00 Awesome Stuff: One Great Knob (13)
09:00 Awesome Stuff: Simple Geeky Toys (2)
09:00 Awesome Stuff: Gadgets For The New Year (18)
09:00 Awesome Stuff: A Post-Holiday Grab Bag (0)
13:34 How Private-Sector Innovation Can Help Those Most In Need (21)
09:00 Awesome Stuff: Towards The Future Of Drones (17)
09:00 Awesome Stuff: Artisanal Handheld Games (5)
09:00 Awesome Stuff: A New Approach To Smartphone VR (5)
09:00 Awesome Stuff: Let's Bore The Censors (37)
09:00 Awesome Stuff: Open Source For Your Brain (2)
09:00 Awesome Stuff: The Final Piece Of The VR Puzzle? (6)
09:00 Awesome Stuff: The Internet... Who Needs It? (15)
09:00 Awesome Stuff: The Light Non-Switch (18)
09:00 Awesome Stuff: 3D Printing And Way, Way More (7)
13:00 Techdirt Reading List: Learning By Doing (5)
12:43 The Stagnation Of eBooks Due To Closed Platforms And DRM (89)
09:00 Awesome Stuff: A Modular Phone For Makers (5)
09:00 Awesome Stuff: Everything On One Display (4)
09:00 Awesome Stuff: Everything Is Still A Remix (13)
09:00 Awesome Stuff: Great Desk Toy, Or Greatest Desk Toy? (6)
09:00 Awesome Stuff: Sleep Hacking (12)
09:00 Awesome Stuff: A Voice-Operated Household Assistant (19)
More arrow